Shockingly low number of loans issued to Charlestown small
businesses
Rep. Donna Walsh, lobbying the Governor. DLT Director Charlie Fogarty (left) |
By Will Collette
Wednesday’s “Community Business Outreach Forum,” held at the
newly reopened General Stanton Inn, drew a standing-room-only crowd mostly
comprised of small business owners in Charlestown to hear Governor Lincoln
Chafee as well as federal and state agency officials talk about opportunities
Charlestown businesses can tap into to boost the town’s economy.
The event was organized by Economic Improvement Commission
Chair Frank Glista[1]
with the state Economic Development Corporation. Starting with warm welcoming
remarks from Governor Chafee, who singled out Rep. Donna Walsh for her hard
work in the legislature to aid small business growth, the session largely
featured ways for Charlestown small businesses to get the help they need to
thrive.
But the most shocking new information presented at this
forum was news that Charlestown businesses only have three US Small Business
Administration–approved loans on the books, together totaling only $182,000,
and no
loans at all from Rhode Island’s Ocean State Business Development
Authority.
SBA Director for RI Mark Hayward talks about low-interest business loans that Charlestown businesses don't get |
The Authority chair, Bud Violet, quipped that he told his
accounting staff to give him a printout of all the participating Charlestown
businesses and, finding none, he said he planned to stick around town until at
least one Charlestown business owner decided to take advantage of their great
programs.
For example, Bud Violet noted they can give RI businesses
fixed-rate 20-year loans at 4.3% and 2.8% 20-year fixed-rate loans for
machinery and equipment. The standard down payment is 10%, but there are also
funds available from the EDC that can cut the down payment to 5%.
Ocean State Business Development Authority head Bud Violet was amazed that not one Charlestown Business has used available business capital from his agency |
He said these loans can be used for almost any kind of
practical business purpose except the purchase of investment property. The
example he gave was that of buying a strip mall. He said that they finance
retail establishments, restaurants, hotels and other tourism-related businesses
all the time.
The presenters also described funding available for
renewable energy, such as wind turbines (all are forbidden
in Charlestown unfortunately even residential and small commercial ones, by act of the CCA Town Council majority on
the advice of the CCA-controlled Planning Commission) and solar power. Charlestown
Wine & Spirits much-heralded green energy design received such funding.
Programs can be combined to make pending affordable housing
projects like ChurchWoods and Shannock Village even better and even more
integrated into the fabric of Charlestown life.
It occurred to me that signage problems, like those that
were raised at the October 9 Town Council meeting (click
here), where three small business owners in town told the Council how they
are being choked to death by Charlestown’s draconian antisignage ordinance,
could possibly be solved through small business loans. I had the picture in my
mind of a great new, tasteful business sign. Such a sign could be bought
through business loans that would enable merchants to meet every imaginable CCA/Ruth Platner restriction.
Yes, if you’re sensing an onrushing anti-CCA rant, you’re
right. I sat in that meeting hearing about all the amazing opportunities that
we are missing, due in large part to the antibusiness environment the CCA has
created in this town over the past four years.
DLT Director Charlie Fogarty talks about business opportunities while Tom Gentz (seated, left) studies his speech |
I watched and listened to CCA Town Council boss Tom Gentz
struggle to give a coherent reading of his prepared remarks – in every photo of
other speakers, there’s Gentz looking down and studying his speech – which he muffed!
I found it mind-blowing that Gentz actually bragged about
the expansion of businesses – for example, Ocean House Marina – that Gentz and
the CCA have tried to harm or drive out of business. Click
here to read Ordinance 350, sponsored by Tom Gentz and aimed directly at hurting Ocean House Marina, and click
here to listen to a session of character assassination that Gentz permitted
to take place before the Council in support of his punitive ordinance.
Shame on you, Tom Gentz!
Gentz, as well as CCA Town Council Vice-President Dan
Slattery,[2]
who sat in the audience, had nothing to contribute to the forum, other than
Gentz’s awkward and phony remarks. But they
both had lots to say the night before at the Town Council meeting as they
both endorsed Planning Commissioner and CCA wannabe Town
Councilor George Tremblay’s fictional affordable housing report.
They wanted the Town Council to endorse Tremblay’s report
despite its incomplete treatment of the problems of affordable housing (by
totally omitting rental property), erroneous analysis, and bias, as well as the
lack of any consultation with the town’s Affordable Housing Commission, whose members,
and not the Planning Commission, are actually officially charged with
addressing the issue.
Charlestown's failure to meet its legal obligations on affordable housing is a problem on many levels, not the least of which is the economic well-being of the town. Most municipalities pay close attention to the need for "workforce housing" for potential workers as a key part of any economic strategy.
Plus, construction activity - whether it's retrofitting existing homes to become affordable rentals or building new homes - is an important economic indicator. The most common occupation in Charlestown, according to the US Census, is construction. The CCA's refusal to find sustainable solutions that meet our legal duty is bad for Charlestown's economy.
Charlestown's failure to meet its legal obligations on affordable housing is a problem on many levels, not the least of which is the economic well-being of the town. Most municipalities pay close attention to the need for "workforce housing" for potential workers as a key part of any economic strategy.
Plus, construction activity - whether it's retrofitting existing homes to become affordable rentals or building new homes - is an important economic indicator. The most common occupation in Charlestown, according to the US Census, is construction. The CCA's refusal to find sustainable solutions that meet our legal duty is bad for Charlestown's economy.
Gentz and Slattery got their colleagues to agree to send
Tremblay’s embarrassingly bad piece of work[3]
to every other city and town with the plea that these other cities and towns
join with Charlestown in opposing affordable housing.
Governor Chafee thinks Charlestown is a "hotbed of progressivism." I'm not making this up. |
I could go on about that subject – I have before, and no
doubt will again – but suffice to say that our CCA-controlled town government has
no sense or concern about the needs of Charlestown other than the very
privileged and self-interested constituency they really serve.
But despite the CCA retro attitudes, lots of great ideas and
projects came from audience members, such as Steve Maciel from Buckley Heating,
who noted a new “Healthy Places
by Design” program being implemented locally in cooperation with the RI
Health Department. The concept fits nicely into sustainable development such as
the ChurchWoods project.
Maciel’s description of the concept was so animated and
interesting that it provoked Governor Chafee to quip, “Who knew that Charlestown was a
hotbed of Progressivism? Quite a hip place here.” Direct quote, Mikey,
not something I made up.
I came away convinced that Charlestown could have a bright
future that sacrifices none of its environmental treasures and indeed makes
Charlestown an even more pleasant place to live. Except it’s not gonna happen
under the CCA’s leadership.
FOOTNOTES
[1]
DISCLOSURE: Frank is a friend and colleague of mine on the Charlestown
Democratic Town Committee and a CDTC-endorsed candidate for the Planning
Commission. This forum was a clear demonstration of the kind of leadership
qualities Frank would bring to Planning if elected by you on November 6.
[2]
DISCLOSURE: Gentz, Slattery and Tremblay are ALSO on the November ballot. They
are not emphasizing their economic
development positions, although they are not above taking credit for things
they actually opposed. Kinda like Mitt Romney taking credit for saving General Motors. They are also not above simply making stuff up if it
advances their political ambitions.
[3]
Not sure if they plan to send Tremblay’s hand-written appendices with the
report. Not that it would make much difference in the effect this report will
have on Charlestown’s credibility.