Why CCA’s Dan Slattery does not deserve a second Town
Council term
CCA Town Council Vice-President Dan Slattery has maintained
a low profile over the past several months. Perhaps he is hoping that no one
will remember all the chaos he has caused in Charlestown and will
re-elect him. Slattery has indeed left a Sandy-like swath of destruction
through Charlestown. Here’s a quick review of Slattery’s recent political
career, including his one term on the Town Council.
In 2008, Slattery presided over the CCA’s first election
campaign where the CCA ran five Town Council candidates against then Council President Jim Mageau. The CCA unseated Mageau
through the use of vicious personal attacks against him and his running mate
Bruce Picard. Earlier CCA attacks were so bad that they forced Council
President John Craig to resign mid-term and move out of Charlestown.
Slattery also presided over the CCA’s 2008 endorsement of
former Democrat Matt McHugh in his effort to run as an independent against Rep.
Donna Walsh. McHugh told the CCA general meeting where he received their
endorsement that he planned to continue his efforts to win voting
rights for non-resident property owners, a cause the CCA
and its big brother, the RI Statewide Coalition, have embraced.
Click to enlarge. Slattery's 2010 campaign statement - how well did he keep his promises? Read this article, read the evidence, then decide. |
They
split the vote and the seats – two to the excommunicated former CCA Councilors and
two to the new- but won control of the Town Council when nominally independent
Lisa DiBello won a seat and generally voted their way.
From the start, Slattery and his CCA colleague Tom Gentz,
with support from DiBello, began to practice the opposite of the “open, honest,
transparent and professional government” they promised during the campaign.
At their very first Council meeting, they blatantly defied
the Open Meetings Act by coming in with a pre-written
resolution to ban wind energy. This pre-orchestrated action seemed in
direct defiance of an Attorney General
decision in a 2006 CCA complaint against Jim Mageau where they charged
Mageau and his colleagues with coming to their
first Council meeting having held a private meeting in violation of the Open
Meetings Act. But, in the CCA’s worldview, rules only apply to others, not
themselves.
Deputy Dan Rides Again
Slattery’s term in office has been marked by repeated efforts
to round up posses to go after favorite bogeymen. I started calling Slattery
“Deputy Dan” to lampoon his often bizarre efforts to find villains where none
exist. His two most infamous posse rides were the Battle
for Ninigret Park and the closely related “Kill Bill Campaign.”
The Ninigret Park battle started when Slattery found out the
Interior Department objected to a town proposal to place sports lights in
town-owned Ninigret Park (the Pop Warner football kids wanted some extra
practice time in the autumn).
Rather than let the Parks and Recreation Commission handle it reasonably as they undoubtedly would, Slattery sided with the federal government and began a now well-documented e-mail exchange with US Fish and Wildlife’s Charlie Vandemoer to develop a plan to give the federal government more control over town land.
Rather than let the Parks and Recreation Commission handle it reasonably as they undoubtedly would, Slattery sided with the federal government and began a now well-documented e-mail exchange with US Fish and Wildlife’s Charlie Vandemoer to develop a plan to give the federal government more control over town land.
The lynchpin to Slattery’s plan was to violate one of
Slattery’s 2010 campaign promises to respect town commissions[1].
Slattery
introduced a string of motions to strip the Parks and Recreation Commission
of its powers under the Town Charter and to transfer oversight of Ninigret Park
to a select committee of CCA allies and Charlie Vandemoer.
Slattery’s Council colleague Tom Gentz joined the Battle promoting the totally inaccurate information that
the feds were going to take back Ninigret Park and that, under law, the town
had no rights to stop them.
Spanked by the Westerly Sun. Click here. |
Slattery, a retired federal bureaucrat, forgot that he is
supposed to serve Charlestown, not his former employer. He also forgot his
allegiance to the truth while he and Vandemoer concocted this phony emergency.
Slattery also forgot – or simply reneged on – his 2010 campaign pledge to
include and honor town commissions in his cutthroat attack on the Parks and
Recreation Commission.
In the end, Slattery became a laughing stock, and even the Westerly
Sun, in an editorial, took him to the woodshed for his foolish posse ride.
Collateral damage
DiLibero - collateral damage |
My theory is that Slattery and Gentz concocted the “Kill
Bill Campaign” to bind Councilor Lisa DiBello to them through their wild and
crazy crusades. DiBello
was and still is suing DiLibero, as well as the town of Charlestown, for $1.5
million because DiLibero fired her for cause. But, as we so often saw,
there is nothing Slattery won’t do to pursue his villains, real or imaginary.
As a result, Charlestown lost a Town Administrator who was, viewed objectively,
doing an honest, competent job.
While Slattery deserves to be turned out of office just for
the gut-wrenching Battle for Ninigret Park and “Kill Bill” campaigns alone,
there is so much more to his record.
Slattery’s Secrets
While the CCA was publicly
backing wind turbines for Charlestown and his colleague Tom Gentz was publicly
touting wind energy by testifying before the Town Council about the CCA’s
support for wind energy and, later, pushing for the municipal wind turbine
project in Ninigret Park, Slattery was secretly organizing NIMBY opposition to
wind power. As shown in the WTF
series by Progressive Charlestown guest writer Bob Yarnall, Slattery rode
his little bicycle from home to home in neighborhoods adjacent to wind turbine
proposals, illegally stuffing flyers against wind power into people’s
mailboxes.
Later, when wind energy split the CCA 2008 Town Council
slate against the CCA faction led by Planning Commissar Ruth Platner, Slattery
started to publicly speak out against wind energy saying that he had collected
numerous research reports about the disastrous health effects of wind energy. Slattery
has never publicly shared that research even though he referred to it
during several Town Council meetings.
Click to enlarge: from Slattery's sworn affidavit |
Click to enlarge |
First, there was never any serious doubt or concern about
improper actions by Friends of Ninigret Park. But it was shocking to find out
that Slattery, on his own, had conducted an “investigation” that included
conducting interviews of town staff and collecting evidence.
Evidence that Slattery then refused to make public. I filed
an open records request and Slattery refused to disclose what was in that file
he waved at the Council meeting.
Click to enlarge |
In response to my formal complaint against him for violating
the state open meetings law, Slattery
admitted that he had no authority to conduct the investigation – this, in
support of his argument that, since his “posse” was unauthorized, the records
weren’t public records. He also admitted that he broke his public promise when
he turned down Councilor Avedisian’s request.
Taxing Double-talk.
The CCA has been rewarded handily - click here to read the details. |
Slattery wanted to make
sure that no one “earning $80,000 a year
but maxing out on their credit cards” would get any leniency on their tax
payments. These investigations would be conducted by Slattery and a select
group of town officials. This appalling invasion of privacy failed to win
Council approval.
Slattery then came back with an even more bizarre scheme,
with the acronym RHOTAP.
What the initials mean is less important than what this proposal would have
done. Under
Slattery’s RHOTAP, needy Charlestown property owners would petition a panel of
selected town volunteers for tax relief. They would have to write an essay
saying why they were worthy of help and divulge complete financial details. They
may even have to appear before this panel to plead their case.
This grotesque proposal died swiftly after its lack of
confidentiality, never mind its impracticality came to light. But who knows how
many secret files Slattery opened on Charlestown residents in financial
distress during this episode.
Taking Chariho to school
Slattery raised an odd complaint last winter that he found
the Chariho school system budget difficult to read. Chariho, like every other
school district in the state, had switched to a new state-mandated budgeting
system that, I will be the first to admit, is very hard for the layperson to
read. However, Slattery wanted to make this his personal campaign where he
would rally the other two towns in the Chariho district to oppose this
budgeting change.
Slattery failed to get the needed three votes to proceed.
But, undaunted, Deputy
Dan did it anyway, and did indeed get the other two school districts to
sign on to an insulting letter to Chariho Superintendent Barry Ricci,
condemning Ricci for following the state mandate by producing a budget Deputy
Dan and counterparts in Richmond and Hopkinton couldn’t read.
Going after poachers and rustlers
One of Slattery’s favorite rituals is his periodic “Citizen
Forums.” These are events where anyone can come and speak about anything they
want for as long as they like. Very few people actually show up, perhaps
because the need is already satisfied by the Public Comment segments we have in
each Town Council meeting. However, current CCA President Virginia Wooten is a
regular and she loves to talk about open space at these events. At one of them,
Ms. Wooten complained that Charlestown owns a lot of properties all over the
town, and that she was worried they weren’t properly
inventoried, monitored and managed.
Deputy
Dan inflated Ms. Wooten’s complaint by then saying that because “many
citizens have expressed concerns” (in reality, it was only Ms. Wooten) about
these phantom properties, that the town needed to snap to it and find out what
it had and what was happening.
This
led to a major investment of staff and volunteer resources to locate all the
phantom properties. As Deputy Dan breathlessly reported, there were signs
that people were encroaching on some of these town properties, noting that
there seemed to be some instances where residents’ gardens had overlapped onto
this unused town land.
Something clearly needed to be done, said Deputy Dan, echoed
by Councilor Lisa DiBello. Let’s get a surveyor and map out all these
properties precisely to prevent unauthorized use, such as those invading
gardeners. Councilor DiBello enthusiastically expanded on the idea by
suggesting that these properties needed to be clearly sign-posted and perhaps
even fenced.
When Councilor Gregg Avedisian and others noted that the
costs for doing this would run into the hundreds of thousands of dollars,
Councilor Tom Gentz suggested that Deputy Dan’s posse needed to come up with a
plan, including a cost estimate, and return with a report. That was the last we
heard from the Phantom Properties Posse.
Casual relationship with the truth
It’s not just Slattery’s bizarre choices in causes to pursue
that should give voters pause. A common thread to most of Slattery’s posse
chases is not just how he bends and twists information to fit a formula he can
exploit, it’s also how readily – and sometimes convincingly – he simply makes
things up.
The Battle for Ninigret Park was probably the worst example,
where instead of defending Charlestown’s interests, Slattery accepted Charlie
Vandemoer’s incorrect interpretation of the town’s rights to use Ninigret Park.
When Slattery rolled out the issue at the March Town Council meeting, he
asserted there were two critical collections of records to support his
assertion that the town had the “moral,
ethical and legal obligation” to run Ninigret Park only in ways that
Charlie Vandemoer found acceptable.
One of those records became public and, once public, it
became clear to all (except Slattery, Vandemoer and the CCA) that the documents didn’t say what Slattery said they said.
Slattery's motion - Document #2 either disappeared or never existed |
Then Document #2 disappeared from mention and Slattery
pretended as if he never referred to it. Slattery also denied that his motions
to strip Parks and Recreation of oversight over Ninigret Park said what they
said. He also denied that he ever said Ninigret was in any danger. But Slattery
was publicly rebuked and rebutted, not just for acting irresponsibly, but for
trying to lie his way out of it. Click here,
here
and here.
That wasn’t the first time Slattery tried to lie his way out
of trouble but got publicly nailed for it. When the Council was about to pass a
CCA-backed town ordinance effectively banning small residential wind turbines,
the Charlestown Democrats requested a time slot to speak against it. Slattery
and Gentz were adamantly against allowing CDTC spokesperson Tim Quillen
(now a Town Council candidate) to speak and convinced Marge Frank to vote with
them to censor Quillen.
Town Solicitor Peter Ruggiero later told Slattery and Gentz
that it was illegal for them to censor a speaker from speaking on behalf of a
group (indeed, both Slattery and Gentz had testified often before the previous
Town Council as CCA leaders). So they had to relent and allow Quillen to speak.
But not before denying they ever tried to block him.
With shouts of “Liar!”
coming from the audience, they had to back down and, according to the minutes,
Gentz apologized to the audience and to Quillen for attempting to censor him.
Slattery did not relent or apologize, nor did he retract his lie.
And now he wants your vote so he can keep on riding for
another two years.
[1]
Ignoring town commissions has been one of the hallmarks of Slattery and Gentz’s
rule over the Council. They ignored the Conservation Commission during the
Y-Gate Scandal. They ignore the Affordable Housing Commission on affordable
housing policy. They ignored the Economic Improvement Commission on the
lighting ordinance. And of course, Slattery’s Ninigret Park coup was a full-out
attack on the Parks and Recreation Commission. The only Commissions they seem
to like are Planning (controlled by Commissar Ruth Platner) and Budget
(controlled by the pliable chair Richard Sartor). Other town commissions are
pretty much irrelevant to their plans.