Important
swing vote goes from Undecided to Yes
By
Will Collette
On
Thursday, the Senate
Judiciary Committee of the RI Senate will hold its first hearing on marriage
equality legislation. Although the RI House easily passed its version of
legislation to legalize same sex marriage, the measure’s fate in the RI Senate
has been in doubt, due largely to the allegiance Senate President Theresa
Paiva-Weed has for the Catholic bishop of Providence, as opposed to the 60%+ of
Rhode Islanders who support marriage equality.
Paiva-Weed
has been stalling even allowing this upcoming hearing to take place, but the
organizing pressure on her and her Senate colleagues has been intense. Ask Senator
minority leader Dennis Algiere (R-Westerly, Charlestown, South Kingstown). Sen.
Algiere was identified by both foes and supporters of gay marriage as an
undecided swing vote, crucial given how closely divided the Senate head
count is.
Another
Republican swing vote, Senator
Nick Kettle (R-Coventry) has also affirmed that he will be voting “yes” for
marriage equality. His rural district is much more conservative than Algiere’s.
Cathie Rumsey is already a co-sponsor |
But
then, so is Senate District 34, which includes the top half of Charlestown and
extends through Hopkinton, Richmond and Exeter. That district is represented by
Sen.
Cathie Cool Rumsey (D) who was one of the initial co-sponsors of the Senate
marriage equality legislation.
Senator Sue Sosnowski (D) whose district is centered on South Kingstown, is also a co-sponsor of the Senate marriage equality bill.
Senator Sue Sosnowski (D) whose district is centered on South Kingstown, is also a co-sponsor of the Senate marriage equality bill.
The
chair of the Senate Judiciary Committee, Sen. Michael McCaffrey of Warwick, is
as opposed to marriage equality as Senate Prez Paiva-Weed, so the future of the
legislation is still very much in doubt. It is a rare occurrence in Rhode
Island for legislation to succeed when top leadership are in opposition.
But
since public support is growing, due in large part to effective organizing, it
will be hard to kill marriage equality legislation outright. The main concern
civil rights advocates have now is that the
Senate will festoon the bill with an array of exemptions to the law.
Essentially, they will water down the legislation by legalizing discrimination
against gays and lesbians by broad categories of businesses and institutions.
Since
the Senate seems unlikely to pass the legislation without some forms of
legalized bigotry, the House will then have to decide how much of that
legalized bigotry it will tolerate.
As
the bill moves forward – presuming the Senate Judiciary does more than simply
hold a hearing to placate bill proponents – every amendment will bear
microscopic examination.