Local anti-vaxxer politicians Justin Price, Elaine Morgan and Flip Filippi should read this

HPV vaccine reduces cervical pre-cancers in young women, new research shows

University of New Mexico Comprehensive Cancer Center

  

Politicians like Rep. Blake Filippi (far right, naturally) are big on "cancer
awareness" - whatever that means - but oppose mandatory vaccinations to
stop this communicable cancer in its tracks. Sen. Elaine Morgan and Rep.
Justin Price are also anti-vaxxers. Charlestown Citizens Alliance photo.

Every 20 minutes, someone in the United States receives a cancer diagnosis related to human papillomavirus. HPV causes cancer of the cervix, anus and throat. 

The HPV vaccine can prevent infections causing most of these kinds of cancer if people receive it before being exposed to the virus. 

But fewer than half the girls and boys in the United States get the vaccine. 

Now, new research published in the Journal of the American Medical Association: Oncology, may spur parents, policy makers and medical professionals to think more about the importance of HPV vaccinations. 

The research shows the HPV vaccine is efficacious in reducing cervical pre-cancers among young women throughout a population.

Cosette Wheeler, PhD, at The University of New Mexico Comprehensive Cancer Center, led the research team and the efforts of the New Mexico Human Papillomavirus Pap Registry, the data source used in the study. 

The New Mexico HPV Pap Registry is the only statewide surveillance program in the United States that includes complete cervical screening, diagnosis and treatment information since the HPV vaccine was introduced in 2007. 

The researchers studied the state's data for young women who received Pap and HPV screening tests and diagnostic and treatment biopsies between January 1, 2007, and December 31, 2014.

The researchers found that among women who were 15 to 19 years old at the time of a diagnostic cervical biopsy, the incidence rate of cervical abnormalities, including those that were classified as precancerous lesions, decreased between 2007 and 2014. 

Among women 20 to 24 years old, the incidence rate of moderate-grade pre-cancerous lesions also decreased. The researchers found all of these changes to be statistically significant.

In 2007, New Mexico began offering the HPV vaccine to females shortly after the United States Food and Drug Administration approved it. In 2008, 48 percent of girls 13 to 17 years old in New Mexico had received at least one HPV vaccine dose and 17 percent received all three doses. 

By 2014 that percentage increased to 59 percent of girls receiving at least one HPV vaccine dose and 40 percent receiving all three doses. Women aged 11 to 14 in 2007 would have been 18 to 21 in 2014.

In line with previous reports, the researchers suggest several factors likely contributed to the reduced cervical pre-cancer rates. 

One factor is cross protection, which is the vaccine's ability to protect against additional HPV types that it does not directly target. 

Another factor is the efficacy of 1, 2 and 3 doses of HPV vaccine. Finally, the third factor is herd immunity, in which those not vaccinated face a lower infection risk because a large portion of the population has been vaccinated. 

HPV vaccines were licensed for males in 2009 and male vaccination can contribute to herd immunity. New Mexico continues statewide efforts to increase HPV vaccination for males and females.

"These data showing significant reductions in cervical pre-cancers represent the results from the overall population of young females which includes those that are vaccinated and unvaccinated. The data suggests that the age at which we begin cervical screening in the United States might be raised soon to age 25 as is already done in a number of other countries. 

"Raising the age at which we begin cervical screening would be one of the first steps in integrating cervical screening and HPV vaccination, an important step in using healthcare dollars more effectively," says Wheeler. "When cervical cancer screening guidelines are revisited soon, these results from New Mexico may be considered in the review process."