Shoreline Study Commission Mulls Change to Lateral Beach Access
ROB SMITH/ecoRI News staff
The swash line, or seaweed line, is a damp sand and shell line with debris. (ResearchGate)
Rhode Island beachgoers could find themselves with extra room to
enjoy the Ocean State’s shoreline next summer.
The House special commission studying lateral shoreline access is
winding down its work, and most of its members agree the boundary between
public shore and private property needs to change.
“The current mean high watermark isn’t practical for the public
and property owners,” said Save The Bay’s Topher Hamblett. “The swash line
seems to be the practical way of dealing with it.”
Commission members seem to be homing in on the swash line, also known
as the wrack line or seaweed line, created when the high tide washes seaweed
onto the beach. A longtime favorite boundary of the state’s shoreline access,
it carries the benefit of almost always being easily identifiable.
The special legislative commission
was created last year to solve an annual conflict as steady as the tides: how
to balance private property rights with the public’s right to access the shore.
The Rhode Island Constitution guarantees the rights of its citizens “to enjoy
and freely exercise all rights of fishery, and privileges of the shore.”
Those rights have been in conflict with beachfront property
owners, who have long alleged that beachgoers are trespassing when they go on
private beaches. A 1984 state Supreme Court case fixed the private-public
property line at the mean high-tide line, a boundary that is invisible to the
casual beachgoer and often literally underwater. That boundary is determined by
18.6 years of average tidal data, which can only be determined with special
equipment.
Most of the commission members at the Jan. 27 meeting agreed continuing
to use the mean high-tide line was no longer a usable option.
“Trying to use that line is a concern, and probably is at this
point no longer the best way in which to ensure the people know exactly what
their rights are,” said commission member and former state legislator Mark
McKenney.
Last year commission chair Rep. Terri Cortvriend, D-Middletown,
introduced a bill that would have allowed the public to walk on the beach
without trespassing at the swash line. But property owners argued that would have
constituted an illegal taking, or seizure, by the government.
“Many property owners say it's a taking, but it goes both ways …
for many beaches most of the year, that [shoreline] access doesn’t exist, it’s
an illusory right. If we adopt the position of many property owners, the public
rights are taken by the private property owner,” said commission vice chair
Rep. Blake Fillipi, R-New Shoreham.In 2015, Flip Filippi erected this fence blocking beach access near one
of his Block Island properties. Read here for the Block Island Times story.
Block Island Times photo. He also blocked the access point that fire and
rescue used to access Ballard's Beach.
Others on the commission expressed doubt any threatened lawsuit
would be successful or harm the state.
“The [legal] threats have been made, and to the best of my
knowledge a state has never had to pay a penny, let alone a $100 million [in
damages],” commission member Dennis Nixon said.
By law the commission must complete its work by March 30 and
submit a report with recommendations to the General Assembly. Cortvriend noted
she expected to accomplish more than just writing a single report, and asked
her colleagues to start submitting opinions in writing.
“Vice chair Filippi and I want consensus around legislation,” Cortvriend
said.
The commission’s next meeting is scheduled for Feb. 10.