Menu Bar

Home           Calendar           Topics          Just Charlestown          About Us

Monday, February 23, 2026

Sam Wilcox, candidate for Senate District representing northern half of Charlestown, announces campaign activities

Help me win Senate District 34 in November

By Samantha (Sam) Wilcox

As the Richmond Town Council President, I’ve worked to keep residents informed through regular newsletters and open communication. When elected to the State Senate, I will continue that commitment at the state level. We deserve leadership that listens, makes decisions grounded in facts, and communicates honestly and transparently.

To connect with residents across District 34, our next Town Hall will be held at the Ashaway Free Library. We’ll have coffee and treats. Come share your thoughts, concerns, and ideas. I look forward to seeing you!

Sam for Senate Town Hall Series – Stop #2

📍 Ashaway Free Library
🗓 February 28
9:30 AM

Next Stops:
📍 Exeter Public Library – Thurs., March 12 @ 5:30 PM
📍 Cross Mills Public Library – Wed., March 18 @ 5:30 PM

Running a campaign across the largest Senate district in Rhode Island takes real resources (from postage to printed materials) to ensure voters in Richmond, Exeter, Hopkinton, Charlestown, and West Greenwich hear our message.

I hope you’ll join us for a fun evening of trivia and dinner in support of our campaign!

Sam for Senate Trivia Fundraiser

🗓 March 30 | 6–8 PM
📍 Downey Weaver American Legion Post 34
22 Whipple Drive
🎟 $25 Suggested Donation
🔗 https://secure.actblue.com/donate/trivia34

Your support will help us continue the momentum needed to win in November!

Other Upcoming Events:

**Show Some Love – February 24 | 6–8 PM | The Titled Barn**

Representative Megan Cotter is hosting her annual personal care drive to support RICAN and Exeter Social Services. Dinner is on her! Admission is one personal care item (soap, shampoo, or other hygiene products). A great way to give back and connect with neighbors. 

**Sue AnderBois for Lieutenant Governor – March 1 | 10am-12pm | Celebrated**

Sue AnderBois, a Providence City Councilor running for Lieutenant Governor, will be visiting Celebrated on March 1. I’m excited to learn more about her vision for Rhode Island and to share with her perspectives from our rural communities

As always, thank you for staying engaged and involved in our community. I hope to see you at one (or several!) of these upcoming events.

Together, we can bring thoughtful, responsive, and determined leadership to District 34.

Health impacts related to 'forever chemicals' linked to billions in economic losses

$8+ billion a year

By Nick Prevenas, University of Arizona

edited by Stephanie Baum, reviewed by Robert Egan

The negative health impacts from contamination by so-called forever chemicals in drinking water costs the contiguous U.S. at least $8 billion a year in social costs, a University of Arizona-led study has found.

The study, published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, builds on previous research into how PFAS—per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances—can negatively impact health when the chemicals contaminate drinking water. 

The research team studied all births in New Hampshire from 2010–2019, focusing on mothers living near PFAS-contaminated sites.

Sunday, February 22, 2026

Thanks to a MAGA gun nut, Charlestown and South County are about to become a culture war battleground

Charlestown to get ripped up over guns

By Will Collette

Dave Levesque has created 40 pro-gun Rhode Island
PACs and is targeting Democratic women in South County
Rhode Island just experienced its second mass shooting this year. First, Brown University and now the mass shooting at a Pawtucket hockey rink.

Quick to respond was Republican House Minority Leader Mike Chippendale (R-Foster). First, he gives us the rote thoughts and prayers line and then shifts to deflecting away from guns to mental health and the MAGA-inspired national controversy over gender.

Here’s a key section from Chippendale’s statement:

In the immediate aftermath of events like this, public officials often reach for simple explanations. When leaders say this tragedy was “caused by gun violence,” they are transparently reducing a complex human failure to a single talking point. In cases like this, the firearm was the means, not the cause, and violence of this nature almost always involves deeper factors – severe or untreated mental health struggles, instability, isolation, and warning signs that were missed or ignored. If we are serious about prevention, those realities must be part of the conversation.

Granted, there is always a reason, rational or not, why a person takes a gun (or two or more) and kills people. And yes, it is important to look at those reasons and try to figure out how to prevent them from sparking more carnage.

But Chippendale is wrong to dismissively say “the firearm was the means, not the cause."  The decision to kill for whatever reason combined with easy access to guns is what makes the United States the gun murder capital of the world.

This wrenching issue is about to become a central part of Charlestown’s political culture between now and at least through the September 8 Democratic primary.

Send lawyers, guns and money

I went over the end-of-year campaign finance disclosures for Charlestown’s four major political committees to see how they look at the start of the 2026 election year when they engage in the biennial struggle over control of the town.

I also took a look at the campaign figures for House District 36, held by incumbent Rep. Tina Spears. Gun lobby-backed Leah Boisclair is the figurehead candidate for the League of Rhode Island Businesses (LORIB) seeking to defeat Tina in the September 8 Democratic primary.

Just based on the money, it looks like the District 36 race will be Charlestown's first major election event, focused as it is on the Democratic primary that takes place two months before the General Election.

The LORIB candidate Boisclair is running as a Democrat despite having no known ties to the party. Her sponsor, entrepreneur Dave Levesque, set up 40 political action committees (PACs), one for each municipality plus a statewide PAC, to promote his pro-gun agenda. 

He’s also a devoted MAGA dude who vehemently opposes taxes on the rich such as the state’s new Taylor Swift law that levees a state surcharge on high-priced absentee-owned property.

Levesque is running MAGA-style candidates against virtually EVERY Democratic woman in South County. That includes Charlestown’s state senator Victoria Gu. Levesque is backing MAGA nut Westin Place (R) – Victoria beat him handily in the last two elections.

Levesque is putting a lot of cash behind Carolina resident attorney Leah Boisclair, most of it coming from other LORIB PACs and from pro-gun groups. Boisclair’s campaign finance report shows around $25,000 came in during the final quarter of 2025, leaving her with a balance of $20,519.85 to start the year.

You should take a good look at who gave to each campaign because the numbers tell you a lot about the two candidates. As the adage goes, “follow the money.”

Tina Spears with Sen. Victoria Gu.
 Gu is also a LORIB target
Rep. Tina Spears support

Rep. Tina Spears begins the campaign year coming within $200 of matching Boisclair's gun cash. She has cash on hand of $20,306.21. She raised around $15,000 in the final quarter of 2025.

Of that $15,000, only $1,250 came from political action committees, including the state AFL-CIO, the RI Good Government PAC and PACs representing firefighters, construction and public employees.

There were lots of donations from people who appeared to be family, friends, colleagues from non-profits serving children and people in the district.

This list includes a number of well-known local leaders. Among them:

  • ·       Charlestown Town Council President Deb Carney
  • ·       Lifelong Charlestown activist Frank Glista
  • ·       Former Charlestown Democrats chair Kathleen Marra
  • ·       Rep. Carol McEntee, South Kingstown
  • ·       Tomaquag Museum director Loren Spears
  • ·       Jane Merner from Earthcare composting
  • ·       Rob Lyons from Ocean House Marina

I’ll be on the list for the next report.

Very different funding profile for Boisclair

Leah Boisclair reported $25,000 raised in the last quarter of 2025. Here’s where her money trail takes us.

She donated $2,500 from her own law practice. According to her website, she focuses on defending clients charged with some very unsavory crimes. In a later article, I will dive in more deeply into the choices she made with her law practice. Meanwhile, here’s how she describes her specialties:

She reported $1,650 from the water and wastewater industry – five different companies including local firms AB Hoxie and Benn Water. She may have won with this business sector’s allegiance through a 2022 Ashaway case (detailed HERE). She represented a residential landowner who wanted to put in a large-scale commercial water distribution well. Benn Water was one of the project’s biggest promoters, but the Town of Hopkinton rejected the proposal.

Several metro lawyers have written checks to Boisclair’s campaign.

The two main hardcore Rhode Island gun PACs, the Gun Owners PAC and the 2nd Amendment PAC, kicked in $4000.

Very little of her cash comes from Charlestown or the other towns in District 36. One of the rare local donations came from Bill Coulter, owner of Stony Hill Cattle and former chair of the Charlestown Republican Town Committee. Does that mean there won’t be a Republican contender in this race?

The biggest single block of Boisclair’s cash - $10,500 – came from six of Dave Levesque’s League of RI Businesses (LORIB) PACs. They all give their address as a law office at 1410 Reservoir Ave. in Cranston. This includes the so-called Charlestown LORIB. The other five PACs contributing to Boisclair are the ones purporting to be in Westerly, South Kingstown, North Kingstown, Newport and Block Island.

In the Secretary of State’s corporate database, there is only one registration and that’s for the umbrella organization:

As for the financial reports for the PACs themselves, the search trick is to use “The League” when using the Board of Elections database. Other variations don't work.

Then you will find all of them each with basically identical CF-1 Notice of Organization filings naming Levesque as Treasurer. They are all located in Moretti and Preetti's law office shown above, the same incorporator and the same borad.

The Charlestown LORIB PAC is no exception as the screenshot below shows. It's not located in Charlestown and there’s no one from Charlestown on it.

There is a lot of money shuffling among the LORIB PACs. For example, Charlestown’s LORIB donation to Leah Boisclair appears to be a pass-through from the Narragansett LORIB PAC. Narragansett is where Levesque lives. Narragansett LORIB pays Charlestown LORIB who then funds Leah Boisclair. That’s along with five other Levesque PACs.

It’s an elaborate web but what I see is this: It's all about Levesque. Vote for one of his candidates and you are voting for him. A vote for Boisclair is a vote for Levesque’s pro-gun, anti-tax-the-rich MAGA agenda.

Boisclair used to use her Facebook account as a promotional site for gun-nut groups in Rhode Island. She scrubbed those posting, but not before they were captured on screenshots. I have those images. You can count on seeing a lot of them between now and September 8 Democratic Primary where this race is headed. Between now and then, I plan lots more coverage of this important race.

The General Election funding race

As for the General Election, the campaign finance reports for Charlestown’s four major political committees yield few surprises. The four committees go into the 2026 election with the following cash balances:

  • ·       Current town leader Charlestown Residents United (CRU), $2,391.90
  • ·       Former town leader Charlestown Citizens Alliance (CCA), $9,170.15
  • ·       Charlestown Democratic Town Committee (CDTC), $182.15
  • ·       Charlestown Republican Town Committee (CRTC), $3,583.08

None of these committees raised almost nothing in the final quarter of 2025. Charlestown Democrats brought in $15. The other three committees reported no income.

That’s not unusual since in the past, Charlestown’s real campaigning rarely started before July 4.

Finally, the matchups for Charlestown’s two Senate seats shows:

  • Incumbent Sen. Victoria Gu (D) who has represented Charlestown south of Route One goes into the year with $28,299.50.
  • Her opponent for the third straight time is MAGA nut Republican and LORIB-endorsed Westin Place who goes into the race with $566.66. He hasn’t gotten his infusion of LORIB and gun money yet.

Our embarrassing state Senator Elaine Morgan (R-MAGA) is again running for reelection to represent the northern half of Charlestown. She carries a cash balance of $3,248.27 into the year.

She faces a strong opponent in Samantha (Sam) Wilcox (D), Richmond Town Council President. Sam goes into election year with $7,533.71. I’m proud to say I am on her donor list.

Infallible, of course

Another MAGA week

We're sending it whether they want it or not.

Greenland and Denmark have told Trump they neither need nor want this ship. Greenlanders and four public hospitals, free flights to the mainland for specialized treatment and UNIVERSAL FREE HEALTHCARE. We could use some of this.

But a hospital ship is certainly preferable to Trump sending B-52s and ships full of Marines to take over Greenland.

New Hampshire Republicans want to raise taxes on homes with solar panels

Will the Rhode Island GOP follow suit?

Sarah Shemkus, Canary Media

Republicans shifted from giving tax credits for
solar to charging extra
This story was originally published by Canary Media and is reproduced here as part of the Climate Desk collaboration.

New Hampshire Republicans are attempting to do away with a 50-year-old property tax exemption for households and businesses with solar, contending that the policy forces residents without the clean energy systems to unwittingly subsidize those who have them. Supporters of the exemption, however, say this argument is misleading, insulting, and at odds with New Hampshire’s tradition of letting communities shape their own local governments.

1 in 5 people say losing their pet was worse than losing a person

The grief is very real

By Fiona Brook

Edited by Sadie Harley, reviewed by Robert Egan

ICE Queen Kristi Noem has no such regrets
For one in five people, losing a pet has been more distressing than losing a human loved one. New research has revealed that 21% of those who experienced both types of bereavement found their pet's death harder to bear.

The findings challenge how society views pet loss. It's often dismissed as "disenfranchised grief"—a type of mourning that isn't socially recognized or validated in the same way as other bereavements.

Yet for most pet owners, their animals are family. A 2025 survey by the animal charity RSPCA found that 99% consider their pets part of the family rather than "just a pet." On Instagram, #dogsarefamily alone has 3.4 million posts.

The latest study of 975 British adults revealed something striking. Around 7.5% of people who'd lost pets met clinical criteria for "prolonged grief disorder"—comparable to rates following many human deaths. The work is published in the journal PLOS One.

Grief typically involves a range of emotions including anger, denial, relief, guilt and sadness. Prolonged grief disorder, however, is more severe—the psychiatrists' diagnostic manual, the DSM-V, defines it as "intense and persistent grief symptoms which are not only distressing in themselves but also associated with problems in functioning" lasting 12 months or more after a loss.

Currently, only human deaths qualify for this diagnosis. But the research, led by Philip Hyland of Maynooth University in Ireland, found no measurable differences in how prolonged grief disorder symptoms manifest, whether the loss involves a person or a pet.

Pet loss actually accounted for 8.1% of all prolonged grief disorder cases in the study—a higher proportion than many types of human losses. Those who had lost a pet were 27% more likely to develop prolonged grief disorder symptoms than those who hadn't.

That figure sits between the rates for losing a parent (31%) and losing a sibling (21%). It's higher than the rates for losing a close friend or other family member.

Hunker down!



Trump files federal appeal to overturn court order blocking his crusade against New England wind energy

Trump's relentless hatred for wind energy

By Anastasia E. Lennon, Rhode Island Current

This story first appeared in The New Bedford Light. Read the original version here.

The Trump administration has appealed a December ruling that struck down a presidential memorandum barring offshore wind leasing and permitting. 

Judge Patti B. Saris had declared the wind memo, issued by President Donald Trump on his first day back in office, unlawful. But on Tuesday, the U.S. Department of Justice filed a notice of appeal

It comes one week after Interior Secretary Doug Burgum said the administration would “absolutely” appeal other court rulings issued in January and February that lifted the federal suspension orders on five under-construction offshore wind projects, including Vineyard Wind.

Those suspensions were issued shortly after Saris’ ruling on the wind memo. At this time, the federal government has not appealed those project-specific lawsuits.

“President Trump has been clear: wind energy is the scam of the century. For years, Americans have been forced to pay billions more for the least reliable source of energy. The Trump administration has paused the construction of all large-scale offshore wind projects because our number one priority is to put America First and protect the national security of the American people,” said Taylor Rogers, White House spokesperson, in an email Wednesday. “The Administration looks forward to ultimate victory on the issue.”

Saturday, February 21, 2026

Trump set up a private bank account in Qatar for the billions we are taking in Venezuelan oil out of the reach of oversight

But he's wrong to think he's in control of Venezuela

Maybe all he wanted was the oil money

by Alix Breeden, Daily Kos Staff

According to Donald Trump, the U.S. and Venezuela are on extremely good terms a month after arresting Nicolás Maduro and transporting the president and his wife, Cilia Flores, to a prison in New York City. 

“Relations between Venezuela and the United States have been, to put it mildly, extraordinary!” Trump wrote via Truth Social Thursday. “We are dealing very well with President Delcy Rodriguez, and her Representatives. Oil is starting to flow, and large amounts of money, unseen for many years, will soon be greatly helping the people of Venezuela.”

However, according to an interview with NBC News released the same day, Rodriguez—who succeeded to power following Maduro’s capture—disagrees with the U.S. perspective. 

“I can tell you President Nicolás Maduro is the legitimate president. I will tell you this as a lawyer, that I am. Both President Maduro and Cilia Flores, the first lady, are both innocent,” the acting president said to “Meet the Press” moderator Kristen Welker in Caracas. 

Rodriguez also told the outlet that the Trump administration has extended an invitation to meet at the White House that she is still considering. 

But the change in temperatures from Trump’s and Rodriguez’s responses highlights the larger, more unstable narrative at play.

The South American country is but one domino piece targeted in the president’s “Donroe Doctrine,” the Trumpified Monroe Doctrine. Venezuela’s oil and its long-term standoff with Maduro made it a prime target under the Trump administration to enforce U.S. dominance over the Western Hemisphere. 

Crime guide

Bobby Jr. posts bizarre video of himself and Kid Rock exercising and drinking mail

See the video here: Secretary Kennedy on X: "I’ve teamed up with @KidRock to deliver two simple messages to the American people: GET ACTIVE + EAT REAL FOOD. https://t.co/PkK8IfkPU4" / X

A loud minority makes the Internet look far more toxic than it is

Not everyone on the internet is a jerk, though many are

PNAS Nexus 

A vocal minority online creates the illusion that toxicity is everywhere. When people learn the truth, their outlook on society becomes more positive almost immediately. Credit: Shutterstock

Americans tend to believe that online spaces are far more hostile than they actually are. Many assume that nearly half of people on major platforms regularly post cruel, aggressive, or abusive comments. In reality, truly severe online toxicity is much rarer. 

One striking example is Reddit, where Americans estimate that 43% of users post highly toxic comments, even though research shows the real figure is closer to just 3%. This gap between perception and reality can quietly fuel a broader sense of pessimism about other people and about society as a whole.

To better understand this disconnect, researchers Angela Y. Lee, Eric Neumann, and their colleagues surveyed 1,090 American adults using the online research platform CloudResearch Connect. The goal was to compare what people believe about harmful online behavior with actual data collected in previous large-scale studies of social media platforms.

The results showed that people dramatically overestimate how common toxic behavior is. On Reddit, participants believed toxic commenters were 13 times more common than they truly are. A similar pattern appeared on Facebook. Participants guessed that 47% of users share false or misleading news stories, even though existing research suggests the real number is about 8.5%. In other words, people assume that misinformation and harmful content dominate social media feeds far more than they actually do.

Closing in on a universal vaccine

Nasal spray protects mice from respiratory viruses, bacteria and allergens

By Stanford University Medical Center

Edited by Sadie Harley, reviewed by Robert Egan

Bobby Jr. has a different idea about what to put up your nose
In the realm of medical advancements, a universal vaccine that can protect against any pathogen has long been a Holy Grail—and about as elusive as a mythological vessel. But Stanford Medicine researchers and collaborators have taken an astonishing step forward in that quest, surprising even themselves.

In a new study in mice, they have developed a universal vaccine formula that protects against a wide range of respiratory viruses, bacteria and even allergens. The vaccine is delivered intranasally—such as through a nasal spray—and provides broad protection in the lungs for several months.

In the study, published in Science, researchers show that vaccinated mice were protected against SARS-CoV-2 and other coronaviruses, Staphylococcus aureus and Acinetobacter baumannii (common hospital-acquired infections), and house dust mites (a common allergen).

In fact, the new vaccine has worked for a remarkably wide spectrum of respiratory threats the researchers have tested, said Bali Pulendran, Ph.D., the Violetta L. Horton Professor II and a professor of microbiology and immunology who is the study's senior author. The lead author of the study is Haibo Zhang, Ph.D., a postdoctoral scholar in Pulendran's lab.

If translated into humans, such a vaccine could replace multiple jabs every year for seasonal respiratory infections and be on hand should a new pandemic virus emerge.