Menu Bar

Home           Calendar           Topics          Just Charlestown          About Us

Sunday, February 15, 2026

Study finds no link between COVID-19 vaccines and autism

Guy who brags about snorting cocaine off a toilet seat showed to be wrong AGAIN

Liz Szabo, MA

A new study finds no increase in autism rates in babies born to mothers who received COVID-19 vaccines just before or during pregnancy, compared with children of unvaccinated moms.

The authors of the study, who presented their findings at the Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine 2026 Pregnancy Meeting, told CIDRAP News they hope the research will help dispel myths about COVID-19 vaccines, which multiple studies have found to be safe and effective during pregnancy.

Half of the 434 children in the study, conducted at 14 medical facilities from May 2024 to March 2025, were born to mothers who received at least one dose of an mRNA vaccine during or within 30 days before pregnancy. The other half of the children in the study were born to mothers who weren’t vaccinated before or during pregnancy.

Researchers evaluated toddlers between the ages of 18 months and 30 months for signs of autism using four standard screenings: the Ages and Stages Questionnaire Version 3 (ASQ-3), the Child Behavior Checklist, the Modified Checklist for Autism in Toddlers, and the Early Childhood Behavior Questionnaire. None of these measures are used to make a definitive diagnosis of autism, but they can indicate a need for further testing.

When the researchers compared the scores on all four screening assessments, they found no significant differences between the children born to vaccinated mothers and those born to unvaccinated mothers. 

Real and Fake Solutions to Inflated Drug Prices

Save more by busting Big Pharma crooks

By Philip Mattera, director of the Corporate Research Project of Good Jobs First for the Dirt Diggers Digest 

High prescription drug prices are one of the main components of the affordability problem that continues to afflict all but the most affluent Americans. 

Public officials are addressing the issue, but in two very different ways. One is a gimmick that will do little good; the other is a meaningful attack on pharmaceutical abuses.

On one side we have Trump’s approach, which is to create a web platform—named after himself, of course—that claims it will provide access to the lowest prices. 

TrumpRx, which at this point contains only a large photograph of its namesake in the Oval Office along with grandiose promises, is designed to inform consumers about special deals that will be available through purchases directly from drug manufacturers.

Like many of Trump’s initiatives, TrumpRx is characterized by misleading claims, conflicts of interest, and potential illegality. 

In many cases, the promised savings are illusory. The prices consumers pay when buying directly from the drug companies will be higher than what they would pay using insurance. Those without insurance may benefit, but the amount of the benefit is declining as the companies which signed up for TrumpRx have been raising their prices.

Concerns about a conflict of interest stem from the fact that the president’s son, Donald Trump Jr., sits on the board of BlinkRx, a company which is positioning itself to profit from TrumpRx by helping drug companies set up direct-to-consumer systems linked to the program.

And concerns about illegality are linked to the possibility that TrumpRx may run afoul of the Anti-Kickback Statute by steering patients to higher-cost medications that they may end up receiving through Medicare and Medicaid.

Saturday, February 14, 2026

It’s Too Late, Trump. You Cannot Undo the Multi-Racial, Multi-National Real America

Our nation’s true history is one of diversity

Mitchell Zimmerman in Common Dreams

Notice to Donald Trump and his MAGA myrmidons: It’s too late by centuries to turn the United States of American “back” into the ethnically homogenous nation for white people which it never was. And that’s nothing to be disappointed about.

Most Americans aren’t swallowing your so-called jokes depicting African-Americans as apes, your white supremacist lies about Haitians “eating the pets,” your slanders of law-abiding farmworkers as the “worst of the worst,” your creepy wails about immigrants “poisoning the blood” of America, your demand we exclude refugees who come from what you term “shit-hole countries.”

Fear and hatred are all you offer, and relief from an imaginary conspiracy of Jews and elites which you claim are plotting to “replace” white Americans with invaders from abroad.

The reality: Americans have always been a polyglot people of multiple races and ethnicities. We did not become a multi-national, multi-ethnic people because of a scheme to open our borders. Rather, our nation and its leaders—through ambition to expand the United States—incorporated other peoples into the American mix from our earliest days. Our true history is one of diversity, even if equity and inclusion have been aspirational.

If the Anglo-Saxon whites who first colonized North America wanted it to be an exclusive homeland for white people, they should not have brought half a million enchained Africans to American shores. By the time the Constitution was adopted, the result was that one in five residents of the new nation were enslaved or free Black people.

If whites wanted North America to be an exclusive home for Anglo-Saxon white people, President Thomas Jefferson should not have made the Louisiana Purchase, bringing people of French, Spanish and African ancestry and still more Native American tribal nations into the territory of the United States.

If Anglo-Saxon whites wanted North America to be an exclusive home for white people, pro-slavery forces should not have launched the Mexican-American War of 1846-48 to seize almost half of what had been Mexico, and incorporate its Mexican population into the enlarged United States.

If Anglo-Saxon whites wanted North America to be an exclusive home for white people, we shouldn’t have employed tens of thousands of Chinese immigrant workers to build the Transcontinental Railroad, man the mines, and perform the other dangerous and dirty work that helped build the West.

And for that matter, if Anglo-Saxon whites wanted North America to be an exclusive home for “pure-bred” white people, they should not have encouraged the immigration of millions of Europeans who, at the turn of the Twentieth Century, weren’t really regarded as “white”: Irish, Italians, Poles and Slavs, eastern European Jews and others—“the wretched refuse of [Europe’s] teeming shores”—to work the mills and mines, the factories and farms of America.

Today desperate, hopeful and hardworking immigrants come from the lands south of our border, from India, from China, from the Dominican Republic. Many are fleeing horrific gang violence, persecution, or the impacts of climate change on their native lands. Undocumented immigrants—the so-called “invaders”—commonly do work native-born Americans won’t do.

My grandfather immigrated from Quebec to work in a Rhode Island Mill like this.  Will Collette

Those without documentation provide most of the farm labor force. Trump’s own Labor Department has acknowledged that “agricultural work requires a distinct set of skills and is among the most physically demanding and hazardous occupations in the U.S. labor market.” “Such jobs are still not viewed as viable alternatives for many [U.S.-born] workers.”

Similarly, the labor of undocumented immigrants is critical to the meatpacking industry, food processing, construction, and elder care. Immigrants are not “replacing” American citizens—they are filling needs and struggling for a good life for themselves and their children. That’s what immigrants have always done.

Trump's grandparents, his mother and two of his three
wives were all immigrants
It’s too late, Mr. Trump, for your sleazy appeals to racial hatred. Most Americans know that seeking to degrade others because of their race or ethnicity is deeply wrong—a violation of the values of fairness and decency we struggle to live up to but seldom spurn entirely.

Our nation and the world have real problems—climate change, shrinking opportunity, inequality and poverty, violence and unnecessary suffering. But it has become clear to more and more Americans that your program of meanness, malice, and spleen are not the solution. It is time for you to get out of the way.

Mitchell Zimmerman an attorney, longtime social activist, and author of the anti-racism thriller "Mississippi Reckoning" (2019). His columns have run in Progressive Charlestown for years.

Give us answers, not b.s.

Free Tree Registration is Open!

 

Neighborhood Forest is a nonprofit organization that provides free trees for kids to plant in celebration of Earth Day. Since 2020, they have facilitated the planting of over 280,000 trees! Neighborhood Forest’s mission is to inspire children to plant trees, care for nature, and help create greener, healthier neighborhoods.

Click here to register your child(ren) for this year’s program. An email will be sent out when they arrive, around April 22nd. Those who are interested may also purchase trees to plant.

The deadline for registration is March 15th.

Charlestown Senator Victoria Gu introduces bill to add suicide and substance abuse crisis hotline numbers to school IDs

Connecting kids to help they need

Sen. Victoria Gu and Rep. Earl A. Read III have introduced legislation to include the phone numbers of suicide prevention and substance abuse crisis hotlines on student ID cards.

“With the increasing mental health challenges facing young people, it’s important to put every available resource at their fingertips, literally,” said Senator Gu (D-Dist. 38, Westerly, Charlestown, South Kingstown). “These hotlines are anonymous, available 24/7 and give students an opportunity to open up about their struggles with a trained professional.”

Representative Read, who served for 23 years with the Warwick Police Department, stressed the importance of these hotlines in preventing mental health struggles from becoming tragedies.

Confused by Bobby Jr.'s new dietary guidelines?

Focus on these simple, evidence-based shifts to lower your chronic disease risk

Michael I Goran, University of Southern California

The Dietary Guidelines for Americans aim to translate the most up-to-date nutrition science into practical advice for the public as well as to guide federal policy for programs such as school lunches.

But the newest version of the guidelines, released on Jan. 7, 2026, seems to be spurring more confusion than clarity about what people should be eating.

I’ve been studying nutrition and chronic disease for over 35 years, and in 2020 I wrote “Sugarproof,” a book about reducing consumption of added sugars to improve health. I served as a scientific adviser for the new guidelines.

I chose to participate in this process, despite its accelerated and sometimes controversial nature, for two reasons. First, I wanted to help ensure the review was conducted with scientific rigor. And second, federal health officials prioritized examining areas where the evidence has become especially strong – particularly food processing, added sugars and sugary beverages, which closely aligns with my research.

My role, along with colleagues, was to review and synthesize that evidence and help clarify where the science is strongest and most consistent.

The latest dietary guidelines, published on Jan. 7, 2026, have received mixed reviews from nutrition experts.

Trump is ordering the military to buy coal - for his new battleships?

Next, he'll have Bobby Jr. make it part of the new food plan

This article originally appeared on Inside Climate News, a nonprofit, non-partisan news organization that covers climate, energy and the environment. Sign up for their newsletter here.

Donald Trump plans to announce an executive order on Wednesday directing the U.S. Department of Defense to buy electricity from coal-fired power plants.

The order, first reported by The Wall Street Journal and confirmed by a White House official, comes as the administration plans to repeal the endangerment finding, a landmark climate ruling that determined greenhouse gases pose a threat to public health.

“President Trump will be taking the most significant deregulatory actions in history to further unleash American energy dominance and drive down costs,” White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said in a written statement.

Environmental and security advocates blasted the order.

“It’s expensive, it’s outdated, and it just puts us at risk,” said Erin Sikorsky,
director of the Center for Climate & Security at The Council on Strategic Risks. “Coal is just going backwards, not forwards, for the Department of Defense.”

The anticipated order would direct the Defense Department to enter into agreements with coal plants to purchase electricity.

Lauren Herzer Risi, director of the Environmental Security Program at the Stimson Center, a Washington, D.C. think tank that analyzes issues related to global peace, noted that the order runs counter to the agency’s recommendations, which favor on-site microgrids with distributed energy solutions rather than centralized external power production.

Research by the National Laboratory of the Rockies, formerly the National Renewable Energy Laboratory, found that solar power combined with battery storage can enhance energy security at military bases, at “little to no added cost,” in the event of power outages.

Friday, February 13, 2026

Rhode Island Republicans applaud McGee's renewal energy roll-back; others DO NOT

Environmental groups and labor respond to Governor McKee's push against renewable energy and energy efficiency

Steve Ahlquist

Environmental advocates, state legislators, and labor union leaders spoke out at a State House press conference to oppose Rhode Island Governor Daniel McKee’s budget proposals and executive order on clean energy. The event was sponsored by Acadia Center, Climate Action Rhode Island, and the Green Energy Consumers Alliance.

“Slowing the transition to clean local renewables is a shortsighted plan that doesn’t address the long-term energy affordability and undermines Rhode Island’s economic competitiveness and clean energy future,” said Emily Howe of Clean Water Action. “The investments we make today in energy efficiency make homes more comfortable, use less energy, and reduce energy demand, resulting in lower costs for all rate payers.”

Acadia Center’s Emily Koo put it bluntly: “Cutting clean energy doesn’t protect Rhode Island rate payers. It protects an outdated energy system and keeps us dependent on dirty, expensive fossil fuels. These so-called state mandates, like our renewable energy standard and the charges that support renewable energy and energy efficiency programs, help reduce the largest and fastest-growing component of your bill: supply and delivery costs. It’s a glaring omission to report clean energy costs while ignoring all cost savings, one of the primary reasons for undertaking the energy transition in the first place. Clean energy isn’t at odds with affordability. It’s essential to it.”

The Governor’s bad policy decisions around renewable energy and energy efficiency programs did please at least one group in Rhode Island: Senate Republicans.

“Senate Republicans warned these mandates were unaffordable, we debated the adverse effects on ratepayers on the Senate floor, we have submitted legislation to increase transparency on utility bills, and to fully repeal costly mandates,” said Senate Minority Leader Jessica de la Cruz. “It is good to know the Governor supports our advocacy and, at long last, realizes the detrimental effect of the policies he has historically championed. Now is the time to put partisanship aside and correct the failed policies that have given rise to some of the highest electricity rates in the country.”

“Rhode Island’s mandates on renewable energy rely heavily on taxpayer-funded subsidies. Those costs are borne by ratepayers across all socio-economic backgrounds and present significant financial challenges for businesses and the economy,” said Senate Minority Whip Gordon Rogers. “If the governor’s efforts to solve problems he helped create do not include a full repeal of mandates and a significant reduction in taxpayer subsidies, then he is gaslighting the people of Rhode Island – it’s just too bad that gaslighting can’t be used to heat and power our homes.”

Valentine greetings from the Trump regime

February 26: support our outstanding state Senator

 
From Senator Gu:

Ever since a Republican group announced their intention to target Rhode Island Democrats, including myself, over gun safety laws and other policies that we passed, it’s made one thing clear: we won’t be intimidated.

Reaching voters directly—through newsletters, mail, canvassing, and community events—ensures that people have the information they need to make informed choices, rather than having their voices drowned out by outside PAC money. Thank you to everyone who has already stepped up. If you’ve donated recently and plan to join us, please don’t feel any pressure to give again—your support in all its forms means a great deal.

Here’s the date/time/location:

February 26, 2026 6-8pm

Asia Grille (Private Dining Room): 140 Hillside Rd, Cranston, RI

You can get your ticket online: victoria4ri.com/feb26

Or checks can be made out to:

Friends of Victoria Gu

PO Box 116, Charlestown, RI, 02813

P.S. By tradition, Senators hold fundraisers up north during the January–June legislative session so colleagues from across the state can attend. We’ll also be hosting a fundraiser in the Westerly/Charlestown area in the late spring or early summer, and I look forward to gathering closer to home.

Resist

Whooping cough vaccination for pregnant women strengthens babies' immune systems

Again, vaccines save kids lives

by Radboud University

edited by Stephanie Baum, reviewed by Robert Egan

 International research led by Radboud University Medical Center shows that vaccinating women during pregnancy leads to the transfer of antibodies to their newborns. Antibodies from the mother are transferred to the baby through the placenta. The study showed that after vaccination, these antibodies were detected not only in blood, but also in nasal mucosa, the site where whooping cough bacteria enter the body.

The research appears in The Lancet Microbe.

"The fact that these antibodies reach the nasal mucosa has not been demonstrated before and highlights how effective this vaccination is," say the researchers.

Since 2019, pregnant women in the Netherlands have been offered a vaccination against whooping cough (pertussis) for their unborn child, known as the 22-week shot.

"We give this vaccine to protect babies from whooping cough right after birth. In the first weeks of life, babies are extremely vulnerable and too young to be vaccinated themselves. That's why we vaccinate the mother during pregnancy," explains immunologist Dimitri Diavatopoulos of Radboudumc.

Rhode Island nurses cancel vigil to honor Alex Pretti after threats of violence

"We believe the threats are credible and pose too great a risk to proceed”

By Christopher Shea, Rhode Island Current

A Pawtucket vigil planned Thursday night by Rhode Island nurses to honor the Minneapolis nurse shot and killed by federal agents last month was canceled three hours before it was supposed to start after organizers received threatening comments on social media.

A joint statement from the Rhode Island Nurses Association and SEIU 1199 New England issued at 3 p.m. claimed a Middletown resident allegedly posted threats raising the possibility of weapons being present at the vigil planned for 6 p.m.

“Our mission is to protect and advocate for nurses across the state, and with guidance from the Pawtucket and Middletown Police Departments, we believe the threats are credible and pose too great a risk to proceed,” the Rhode Island Nurses Association and SEIU 1199 New England said in a joint statement.

Chris Hunter, a spokesperson for the city of Pawtucket, confirmed the online threats. He said police in Middletown conducted a wellness check and found the man had weapons at his residence.

Tens of thousands of women are missing besides Savannah Guthrie’s mom – the Justice Dept. used to care

Shining a light on the crisis of missing or murdered black women and girls in the US

By Linda A. Seabrook, US Department of Justice, published November 22, 2024 two months before Ms. Seabrook left DOJ

NOTICE from the Trump Administration: This is an archive page that is no longer being updated. It may contain outdated information and links may no longer function as originally intended.

Screenshot from the New York Post

The United States faces a deeply troubling crisis that has not received the attention it deserves—the alarming number of missing or murdered Black women and girls. Despite the devastating impacts on families and communities throughout the country, the epidemic of missing or murdered Black women and girls has largely remained a silent one. It is time to confront this issue with the urgency and coordinated response it warrants.

On November 12, 2024, the Department of Justice’s Office of Justice Programs held a national convening in Washington, D.C., focused on addressing the crisis of missing or murdered Black women and girls. The event brought together family members, survivors, law enforcement, advocates, journalists, and state leaders, along with federal agency colleagues, to raise awareness of the issue, inform potential future programming and resources, learn from state efforts, and encourage a more robust response to missing and murdered Black women and girls.

The Scale of the Crisis

Black women and girls are disproportionately affected by violence, trafficking, and systemic neglect, leading to high rates of their disappearance, and placing them at greater risk for homicide. Although they make up a significant portion of missing person cases in the U.S., their stories often go underreported and unnoticed by national media and law enforcement.

According to the National Crime Information Center, in 2022, of the 271,493 girls and women reported missing, 97,924, or over 36 percent, were Black, despite the fact that Black women and girls comprised only 14 percent of the U.S. female population at the time.

In addition, according to a recent study published in the peer-reviewed general medical journal The Lancet, Black women are six times more likely to be murdered than their white peers. These stark and tragic statistics reveal and underscore systemic issues of bias, neglect, and a lack of resources that hinder effective responses to this crisis.