Tuesday, July 3, 2012

CRAC’s not the only town commission with late or missing records

Many town commissions lag on posting their records
By Will Collette

As Deputy Dan would put it, Charlestown has a moral, ethical and legal
obligation to abide by the Open Meetings Act
One reader commented on my article about the Open Meetings Act violation committed by the Charter Revision Advisory Committee (CRAC) that this might not be an isolated problem.

Well, that commenter might have read my mind because, in the course of responding to a request for more information from the Attorney General’s Office, I noted that there may be eight additional town commissions with tardy or missing records. That went out in a June 25 e-mail, cc’d to Town Clerk Amy Rose Weinreich.

Since then, some but not all of the deficiencies have been fixed. Just as CRAC Secretary Maureen Areglado was able to instantly produce the missing CRAC minutes, apparently so did some of those other delinquent commission.

Here’s a run-down:



This Commission had not posted any minutes since July 14, 2010, despite having six meeting agendas posted since then. Since June 25: three of the six meetings are now shown as cancelled, but there are still no minutes for the three remaining meetings.


This very powerful Commission, chaired by Richard Sartor, was missing their last two sets of minutes (3/20 and 3/23). The damage had already been done – the commission presented its report to the Town Council, the Council acted on them and the voters voted on the budget on June 4, all while the Town was in violation of OMA’s disclosure requirement. Since June 25: The missing minutes are now posted. Too late.


This commission has not filed minutes since early 2006, but it appears they stopped. This sense, since Charlestown hasn’t building anything recently. They’re down to one member – town Council liaison Gregg Avedisian. Since June 25: there are still no minutes of that last meeting to close the book on this Commission.


This commission has only posted draft minutes since August 2011. Since June 25: this problem has been partially fixed.


This commission had two items posted. One was a set of draft minutes without a meeting agenda. The other  is an agenda without minutes. This group was discussed at the October 11, 2011 Town Council meeting as being on hold due to pending litigation. appears to be totally dormant. Since June 25: no change.


This group, chaired by CCA President Virginia Wooten, posted one agenda but no minutes or anything else. Toxic contamination left over from the old Navy air base is a serious concern, but it looks like this committee didn’t do much about it, including maintenance of records. Since June 25: The town removed the page from its website. Down the old memory hole.


This Commission has not posted its minutes from its 12/15/2011 meeting. Since June 25: no change.


This group had not posted final minutes since April 21, 2011. Since June 25: the draft minutes have been posted.

That’s eight commissions that were delinquent in their records filing on June 25.

Missing records should not be a capital offense
By contrast, there are nine more town bodies that meet their recording requirements with no apparent breaches of transparency. 

These include Affordable Housing (chaired by Evelyn Smith), Beach Structures, Economic Improvement (chaired by Frank Glista), Mosquito Abatement (yes, this is a real town commission and it is chaired by Mac Richardson), Ninigret Park Dog Park (formerly chaired by Tim Quillen), Parks and Recreation (chaired by Paula Andersen), Planning (chaired by the redoubtable Commissar Ruth Platner), Senior Citizens and Wastewater.

Yes, yes, yes, I know all of this seems pretty nitpicky. But in Charlestown, we have citizens who like to speak from the Council platform and the Speaker’s podium or on the CCA blog about the absolute necessity of complete, total, and uncompromising transparency and openness in government.

These transparency preachers have set an uncompromising standard and have made it plain that, no matter how innocent, unintended or inconsequential the breach of transparency, you could lose your job or get run out of town.

As much as I’d like to say we all ought to be less rigid and more tolerant about how well our town’s volunteer-run, sometimes unstaffed commissions and committees operate, there is the matter of state law.

The Open Meetings Act prescribes the way public bodies must behave to ensure community access to needed information. I think we should all applaud the work of all of our Commission volunteers and insist that they get the help and guidance they need to comply with the Open Meetings Act..

I don’t lose much sleep over the missing minutes for most of these groups – though I am relieved to see how meticulously the Mosquito Abatement Commission maintains its records.

But I do object to sloppy record keeping and public notice by groups, such as the CRAC or the Budget Commission, that put important matters before the Council without properly posting all their meeting information on the Town website.

And certainly, this is a central issue in the Donoghue v. Charlestown lawsuit that has kept the town from blowing $475,000 on a worthless conservation easement to buy a rural junkyard.

I think that everyone in Charlestown politics – candidates, noncandidates, PACs and party committees – is prepared to stipulate that openness and transparency in government is a good thing. I think everyone would also stipulate that, from time to time, innocent mistakes will happen.

But from what I found on June 25, and what we’ve seen in this Town Council, we seem to have a systemic problem with openness and transparency in our town government. The issue with the commissions can probably be fixed with some clear instructions to the commissions from the Town Solicitor and a better tracking system in the Town Clerk’s office.

We should also consider the merits of carrying so many Commissions and Committees on the books. I couldn’t help but notice that the Ninigret Park Contamination committee disappeared from the town website right after I pointed them out. If a committee has gone dormant, maybe it’s time to consider taking it off the list.

But what we do about the breaches committed by the Town Council majority will probably take more serious action.