America's security and prosperity depend on
our children's ability to drive the economy of the future.
Barack Obama won his re-election fight because Americans who are
committed to moving forward turned out in record numbers to vote, especially in
battleground states.
But we can't go forward unless Congress sits down and makes the
hard decisions required to create a just budget that invests in children, and
creates jobs for their struggling parents while making sure those who have
benefited from huge tax cuts pull their weight.
Exit polls on Election Day made it clear: A clear majority of
voters agree that the richest
Americans need to pay higher taxes.
To move forward, America's security and prosperity depend on our
children's ability to drive the economy of the future. If a majority of our
kids can't read and compute at grade level, we won't have a strong economy.
Our leaders face crucial budget decisions. They must craft
solutions that will protect the already porous safety nets on which so many
children and families rely, and invest in the health, early childhood
development, and education of our children.
The fundamental principle of protecting
children and other
vulnerable populations has been a cornerstone of deficit reduction since the
bipartisan Balanced Budget Act of 1985. Every automatic budget cut mechanism of
the past quarter century has exempted core low-income assistance programs from
any cuts triggered when budget targets or fiscal restraint rules were missed or
violated.
The American people still strongly support this principle. Last
year, a Gallup poll found that 55 percent of Americans oppose cutting
spending on anti-poverty programs. A Public Opinion
Strategies pollshowed
even larger numbers of likely voters oppose cuts to Medicaid (73 percent) or
education programs (75 percent).
Cutting children from the budget now will cost us all more in
the long run.
On the other hand, economists agree that investing in children
promotes economic growth. For example, investments in education that raise high
school graduation rates have been shown to yield a public benefit of $209,000
per student in higher government revenues and lower government spending, and an
economic benefit to the public purse that is 2.5 times greater than the costs.
Children constitute the poorest age
group in the United
States. More than 16.1 million children in America live in poverty — more than
one in five of all children and more than one in three children of color — so
special efforts must be made to address the needs of these most vulnerable
among us.
Poor children lag behind their peers in many ways beyond income:
they are less healthy, trail in emotional and intellectual development, are
less likely to graduate from high school and to find steady work as adults, and
are more likely to head poor families. Every year we keep these millions of
children in poverty costs our nation at least half a trillion dollars in lost
productivity, poorer health, and increased crime.
Rather than imposing strict austerity measures without regard
for the human consequences, we must invest now in children to prepare them for
the future and help create jobs.
Be careful what you cut. If our children aren't ready for
tomorrow, neither is America.
Marian Wright Edelman
is the president of the Children's Defense Fund. A longer version of
this essay appeared on the Huffington Post Distributed via OtherWords
(OtherWords.org)