Marshes on U.S. Coast Need More
Protection NOW
From: Roger Greenway, ENN.com
A hundred years ago we
thought that we had to fill in the marshes near populated areas along the
eastern US coastline since they represented prime locations for commercial and
residential development.
Even after some protections were put in place to
reduce the impacts of runaway development, marshes continued to serve are the places
we dumped our garbage, and sent the effluents from our wastewater treatment
plants.
They also receive the nutrient-rich run off from agricultural land use
and urban street runoff to our rivers.
For centuries now, the
salt marshes along the U.S. coast have been disappearing, with some experts
estimating that 70 percent have been lost, largely due to development. While in
recent decades the U.S. has done a better job of protecting these ecosystems,
even marshes spared from development are now succumbing to more subtle threats,
from rising sea levels to invasive species.
One factor scientists
always thought marshes could withstand was nutrient enrichment, such as the
flow of nitrogen and phosphorus from fertilizers and septic systems. But that
might not be so, warns Linda Deegan, a senior scientist at the Marine
Biological Laboratory in Woods Hole, Mass., and lead researcher of a long-term
study showing that an overabundance of nutrients may be contributing to the
demise of salt marshes.
During the nine-year
study, in which Deegan's team added nutrients to a Massachusetts estuary, the
researchers found that a burst of growth eventually caused the salt marsh
plants to collapse onto themselves, converting healthy systems into mud flats.
In an interview with
Yale Environment 360 Web editor Kevin Dennehy, Deegan describes the
implications of this study, the vital services lost when marshes disappear —
from nourishing marine species to providing a physical barrier for coastal
communities during storms such as Hurricane Sandy — and what it will take to
prevent further marshland loss.
"What Sandy brought
home is that trying to draw a line and say, 'From here on back is human lands,
and from here forward is the natural system,' isn’t going to work," Deegan
said.
Read Kevin Dennehy's
interview with Prof. Deegan at Yale Environment 360.