Republicans are calling for a
"compromise" as they gear up for another knock-down-drag-out fight.
The
other day, House Speaker John Boehner accused Barack Obama of being mean to the
Republican Party. Our president, he said, was trying to “annihilate” the party
and “shove us into the dustbin of history.”
Would
that it were so. If ever a political party needed annihilation, it’s the
current Republican model.
Having
lost the November presidential election handily — by some five million votes —
the GOP suffered a moment of self-doubt. At a meeting of Republicans later that
month, Louisiana governor Bobby Jindal, one of the rising stars of the party,
called for Republicans to “stop being the
stupid party.”
The
Republicans, especially those holding seats in the House of Representatives,
thought about that for about 15 minutes, then said: “Nah.” And no wonder. In
recent decades the Republican Party has served as a bulwark of ignorance whose
mission is to hold back the nation’s progress.
It’s the party of climate change deniers, creationists, anti-conservationists, tin-foil-hat collectors, and those people who dress in camouflage outfits hoping that someone will take them for war heroes. Get rid of that crowd and there wouldn’t be enough Republicans left to serve as pall bearers at the party’s own funeral.
It’s the party of climate change deniers, creationists, anti-conservationists, tin-foil-hat collectors, and those people who dress in camouflage outfits hoping that someone will take them for war heroes. Get rid of that crowd and there wouldn’t be enough Republicans left to serve as pall bearers at the party’s own funeral.
Which
is not to say Republicans don’t have a plan. They do. The technical name for
their new electoral strategy is “cheating.”
In
swing state after swing state, Republican legislatures, having redistricted all
semblance of democracy out of their congressional and state assembly districts,
are contemplating doubling down on the Electoral College. They claim that it
yields unfair representation in presidential elections. The Republican answer
is to make iteven more
unfair.
Republicans
in Pennsylvania, Florida, Michigan, Ohio, Wisconsin, and Virginia are working
on plans that would allocate electoral votes by the number of congressional
districts carried, rather than by statewide popular vote.
Here’s
how it would work: My state of Michigan, for example, has 14 congressional
districts and 16 electoral votes. President Obama, while he won the state by
450,000 votes, carried only five of the 14 districts.
So Republicans, instead of getting no electoral votes, would pick up nine. (Some analysts have calculated that if similar plans had been in place last year, Mitt Romney would have won the election, despite getting five million fewer votes than his opponent.)
So Republicans, instead of getting no electoral votes, would pick up nine. (Some analysts have calculated that if similar plans had been in place last year, Mitt Romney would have won the election, despite getting five million fewer votes than his opponent.)
So
yeah, Mr. President, if you get a chance to annihilate those losers you should
take it. Do it to them before they do it to you.
While
there’s a good chance Republicans will sober up before they take drastic
election-rigging measures, there’s no doubt that they’re gearing up for another
knock-down-drag-out fight. Only this time they’re calling it “compromise.”
I
watched Paul Ryan, the failed vice-presidential candidate, on one of those
Sunday TV talk shows and he said he was all about compromise.
Striking
a theme that we are sure to hear again and again in the coming months, he said
that the gridlock in Washington was Obama’s fault. “He’s looking to go farther
to the left,” Ryan said, “and he wants to fight us every step of the way
politically.”
He
said that if someone like Bill Clinton were still president, he’d have had the
country’s problems solved by now.
Even
for someone like Ryan, who is always careful to keep truth at a safe distance,
that’s a whopper.
When
the freshly minted President Clinton raised taxes early in his first term, he
did so without a single Republican vote. Not one. Neither did he get any
support for his efforts to fix our national health care mess.
The
tax boost increased revenue and allowed Clinton to balance the federal budget
for the first time in decades. The grateful Republicans spent the next six
years trying to impeach him. And that was when Republicans were reasonable,
compared to what we’ve got now.
So
I don’t think Obama is going to annihilate the Republican Party. I guess I’m
just a pessimist.
OtherWords columnist
Donald Kaul lives in Ann Arbor, Michigan. OtherWords.org