Obama's State of the Union address
nudged the debate in the right direction, but not far enough.
In
his State of the Union address, President Barack Obama deftly nudged the
national debate further away from the dominant austerity framework that brought
us the misguided budget deal on New Year’s Day.
He
also brought much-needed attention to the critical jobs shortage by eloquently
calling the need for more good middle class jobs the “North Star that guides
our efforts.”
But,
did Obama offer a convincing vision for how to do this? Not quite.
First, he missed a beautiful opportunity to connect the jobs and inequality crises with the climate crisis, all of which can be solved with the same solution: a bold transformative “new jobs” agenda. This approach would move government incentives and resources away from fossil fuels and poorly paid jobs to a vibrant, caring, green economy with quality jobs.
Imagine
the stir he’d make if he declared it was time to move from an economy dominated
by Wall Street, Lockheed Martin, and Walmart to a Main Street economy. Or if he
promised to block the Keystone XL pipeline and crack down on the dangerous
practice of natural gas fracking as part of an effort to wean our country off
fossil fuels.
Main
Street embraces everything from clean energy to high speed rail, from
energy-efficient buildings to composting and recycling. And, it means making
sure that fast-growing sectors like elder care jobs are upgraded from Walmart
poverty jobs to ones that pay a living wage.
Yes,
Obama highlighted the challenge of climate change and he mentioned clean
energy. He called for a higher minimum wage and stronger education
opportunities for all. But he failed to make a powerful call for a
transformative economic agenda to replace our Wall Street and Walmart economy
with a fundamentally new one rooted in ecology, equity, and democratic forms of
ownership.
Obama
could also have reminded Americans that there’d be abundant resources to invest in pressing needs if the wealthy, corporations, Wall
Street, and polluters paid their fair
share of taxes and if we cut
fossil fuel subsidies and the wasteful Pentagon
budget.
Obama
knows full well that he’s working with a gridlocked and largely dysfunctional
Congress. But he did make a compelling appeal to lawmakers to take two major
actions that could win in 2013: comprehensive immigration reform, and real gun
control. Both are long overdue and would make this country a better place.
His
salute to Desilene Victor, the 102-year-old Florida woman who became famous
after a lengthy wait to vote last year, underscored concerns about the outrages
of Republican efforts to suppress voting
rights.
And
I also applaud him for urging the renewal of a strengthened Violence Against
Women Act, acknowledging the excesses of CEO
pay, and calling for a
$15 billion construction jobs program.
But
in the face of a Congress too beholden to corporate interests, Obama could have
made a better case for vital actions that his administration can take on their own.
These include ending drone attacks, shuttering coal plants, using the
Environmental Protection Agency to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, ensuring basic
labor rights for domestic
workers, and pardoning prisoners who were unjustly sentenced. Of these, Obama
only indicated that he was ready to order the EPA to take steps to counter climate change.
Obama’s
also clinging to a failed free trade policy. And he’s addicted to oil and gas
even as he embraces alternatives. His foreign policy vision is overly focused
on fighting terrorism as opposed to fostering diplomacy.
Between
his more powerful inauguration speech and this address, he’s begun to shift the
national conversation toward things that matter to most people. But he’s got a
long way to go before he embraces a game-changing agenda.
John Cavanagh is the director of the Institute
for Policy Studies, a progressive think tank celebrating its 50th year.
IPS-dc.org
Distributed via OtherWords. OtherWords.org
Distributed via OtherWords. OtherWords.org