By
SUE KENNEDY/special to ecoRI.org News
When,
in 2009, Rhode Island and Massachusetts coastal zone managers first mulled over
the idea of creating an “area of mutual interest,” they knew uncharted
territory lay ahead.
The
term, often called an AMI, traditionally refers to a location designated for
partners, under contract, to use for extraction of gas and oil. In this case
the AMI refers to an area designated for the two states to explore as part of
the nation’s effort to assess its potential for tapping offshore renewable
energy resources.
But
it was the charted territory — literally, maps of fishing grounds — that
emerged from the collaboration that proved most striking. “This is the first
time I know of that fishermen have knowingly and willingly shown the government
their most valuable areas for fishing, and in a level of detail that can be
used to pin down to specific habitats,” said Grover Fugate, executive director
of the Rhode Island Coastal Resources Management Council (CRMC). “It’s a huge
step forward for protecting fishing grounds and for ocean planning in federal
areas.”
“We
wanted to be sure that fishermen were at the Ocean SAMP table,” said Ocean SAMP
outreach manager Jennifer McCann, director of extension programs for Rhode Island
Sea Grant. “It was a challenge. We heard fishermen say they realized that
unless they showed the federal government which fishing grounds they most
needed, they could be at risk for losing them in the future.”
Protecting Cox’s Ledge
The fishermen’s decision to meet with federal representatives from the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management (BOEM) for “an extensive consultation process,” as described by a BOEM press release from last year, has proven useful thus far. A portion of Cox’s Ledge, an area of rich fishing grounds 30 miles east of Montauk, N.Y., and within the federal AMI, has been removed from BOEM’s menu of potential siting locations for offshore renewable energy projects.
BOEM
officials credit the consultation process for helping them identify a
164,750-acre section of federal ocean as a “Wind Energy Area” that avoids the
portion of Cox’s Ledge. Officials said the Ocean SAMP process opened up an
exchange between government and members of the fishing community that proved
much richer in detail than the interactions of previous decades.
Michael
Marchetti, president of the Eastern New England Scallop Association and a
member of the Ocean SAMP Fisheries Advisory Board, said the removal of the
Cox’s Ledge fishing grounds is an important step in protecting seafood
resources and ensuring people’s livelihoods. “It’s a very important piece of
ground for us; it’s prolific ground for scallop fishermen, and it’s valuable
for the recreational guys as well, for tuna and shark,” he said.
Other
topics could come under the same type of rigorous inspection including the
critically endangered North Atlantic right whale, vessel traffic, and visual
and cultural resources pertinent to the AMI, according to BOEM.
Smart from start
When the AMI project emerged, Rhode Island and Massachusetts coastal zone planners wanted to better position their states to engage with the federal government as it embarked on its first significant foray into offshore renewable resources planning. Having undertaken significant ocean resources planning and management work, both states stood prepared; Rhode Island was developing the Ocean SAMP, while Massachusetts was creating the Massachusetts Ocean Management Plan.
At
the same time, coastal states were starting to engage in the “Smart from the
Start” program, a federal initiative to build efficiency and agility into the
work of determining a slate of offshore locations that could host renewable
energy projects. Recognizing that they both border a portion of federal
offshore waters likely to make that slate, Rhode Island and Massachusetts
agreed to form a partnership — the AMI.
The
AMI, the states agreed, could be helpful on two ends. First, it could meet the
immediate need of enabling the states to work as a single entity on the Smart
from the Start program—thus eliminating any drag of competition and increasing
the efficiency with which the states could collaborate with the federal
government. Second, it provided a committed vehicle through which the states
could work together to answer regional ocean resources management issues.
“With
both states engaged in ocean planning and the responsible siting of offshore
wind, it was easy to recognize the many benefits of working together to realize
shared goals,” said Bruce Carlisle, director of the Massachusetts Office of
Coastal Zone Management.
While
both states found the collaboration a success, it came with its challenges. The
Rhode Island and Massachusetts AMI teams had to not only fully understand their
own state’s ocean issues and political landscape, but also had to quickly
develop a fluency with the partner state’s concerns.
Officials
from both states said the extra effort was worth it; the partnership ensured
that Rhode Island’s and Massachusetts’ goals for offshore renewable energy were
recognized as proactive by the federal government.
Sue Kennedy is the communications specialist URI Coastal
Resources Center/Rhode Island Sea Grant. This article originally was published
in the Fall 2012 41˚ N.