Rep. Donna Walsh announced that the RI Department of Environmental Management (DEM)
has rescinded its “Notice of Intent to Enforce” the state’s solid waste law against
the town over its annual New Year’s Eve bonfire. That notice (click here to read my
article about it) effectively banned the event by labeling the bonfire an
illegal municipal garbage site.
On
April 1, DEM sent the town its decision to rescind (click here to read it)
saying the bonfire was actually “exempt” under the state’s air pollution
regulations and DEM wanted its solid waste management program to be “consistent
with the DEM’s air pollution regulations.” Since the bonfire was OK under the
air pollution regs, it’s now OK under the solid waste regs.
This will come as a relief for the hundreds of area residents, including lots of children, who enjoy the annual bonfire. This year’s program was especially exciting because the intense fire and snow coverage combined to spawn dozens of harmless mini-tornados (click here to read my coverage and see my photos of the tornados).
Frank Glista & grandson in front of assembled bonfire pile |
Frank Glista and volunteers build the bonfire from donated pallets from Arnold Lumber. The event is closely supervised by the Charlestown Fire District (my colleague Tom Ferrio got the honor of clambering up to the top of the pile in his full CFD turn-out gear to make sure everything was in proper order) and coordinated by the Parks and Recreation Department.
Since
word of DEM’s enforcement action against the town broke, there’s been a lot of
speculation about how it happened. DEM is a complaint-driven regulator.
They do not have inspectors roaming the countryside looking for violations.
Indeed,
if you have been following the Copar Quarry
scandal,
even when there are complaints – and lots of them – of health-threatening
environmental hazards, DEM can be unresponsive.
Who's the rat? |
CCA
Party pundit Mike Chambers wrote in one of
his regular “Chamberpots” on the CCA website that I was responsible. Yep,
me. Chambers says that I “let the cat out of the bag” by writing about the
bonfire in Progressive Charlestown.
Chambers
says that DEM can read and they no doubt read Progressive Charlestown (doesn’t
everybody?). Because, he says, “they know the law,” they busted Charlestown. And,
he adds, I should fess up and accept the blame. Read this
Chamberpot
– I’m not making this up.
However,
DEM told Donna Walsh that, as I suspected, they did indeed respond to a complaint,
one that DEM said came from an anonymous source.
Anonymous.
Doesn’t that figure? I wonder if the voice on the phone was high-pitched, nasal and whiny.
Anonymous.
Doesn’t that figure? I wonder if the voice on the phone was high-pitched, nasal and whiny.
As
for Chambers’ statement that DEM knows the law, well, apparently, not so much,
as they themselves admit. They are also a little behind the times – if you read
the DEM letter, it’s addressed to Town “Manager” Bill DiLibero even though
April 9th will be the first anniversary
of Bill’s banishment from Charlestown after the CCA Party’s Kill Bill campaign. Plus the CCA
Party doesn’t believe in the “town manager” form of government.
We’ll
see if the next Chamberpot contains a retraction for errors and an apology for
false accusation…but I ain’t holding my breath.