That’s not to say that a corporate lynching is not in order. JPMorgan’s behavior has been outrageous in many respects. The latest evidence has just come to light in a lawsuit filed by California Attorney General Kamala Harris, who accuses the bank of engaging in “fraudulent and unlawful debt-collection practices” against tens of thousands of residents of her state.
In
charges reminiscent of the scandals involving improper foreclosures by the
likes of JPMorgan, the complaint describes gross violations of proper legal
procedures in the course of filing vast numbers of lawsuits against borrowers,
including:
- Robo-signing of court filings without proper review of relevant files and bank records;
- Failing to properly serve notice on customers—a practice known as “sewer service”; and
- Failing to redact personal information from court filings, potentially exposing customers to identity theft.
JPMorgan
got so carried away with what the complaint calls its “debt collection mill,”
that on a single day in 2010 it filed 469 lawsuits.
The
accusations come amid reports of
ongoing screw-ups in the process of providing compensation to victims of the
foreclosure abuses. For JPMorgan, the California charges also bring to mind its
own dismal record when it comes to respecting the rights of credit card
customers.
In
January 2001, just before it was taken over by what was then J.P. Morgan, Chase
Manhattan had to pay at
least $22 million to settle lawsuits asserting that its credit card customers
were charged illegitimate late fees.
In
July 2012 JPMorgan Chase agreed to
pay $100 million to settle a class action lawsuit charging it with improperly
increasing the minimum monthly payments charged to credit card customers.
The
credit card abuses are only part of a broad pattern of misconduct by JPMorgan.
In the past year alone, its track record
includes the following:
- In October 2012 New York State Attorney General Eric Schneiderman, acting on behalf of the U.S. Justice Department’s federal mortgage task force, sued JPMorgan, alleging that its Bear Stearns unit had fraudulently misled investors in the sale of residential mortgage-backed securities. The following month, the SEC announced that JPMorgan would pay $296.9 million to settle similar charges.
- In January 2013 JPMorgan was one of ten major lenders that agreed to pay a total of $8.5 billion to resolve charges relating to foreclosure abuses. That same month, bank regulators ordered JPMorgan to take corrective action to address risk management shortcomings that caused massive trading losses in the London Whale scandal. It was also ordered to strengthen its efforts to prevent money laundering. In a move that was interpreted as a signal to regulators, JPMorgan’s board of directors cut the compensation of Dimon by 50 percent.
JPMorgan’s
image was further tarnished by an internal probe of the big trading losses that found
widespread failures in the bank’s risk management system. Investigations of the
losses by the FBI and other federal agencies continue.
In
February 2013 documents came to light indicating JPMorgan had altered the results
of an outside analysis showing deficiencies in thousands of home mortgages that
the bank had bundled into securities that turned out to be toxic.
In
March 2013 the Senate Permanent Committee on Investigation released a 300-page report that charged the bank with ignoring internal
controls and misleading regulators and shareholders about the scope of losses
associated with the London Whale fiasco.
In
an article in late March, the New York Times reported that
the bank was facing investigations by at least eight federal agencies. Last
week, the newspaper revealed a
new investigation of JPMorgan by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission,
which was said to have assembled evidence that the bank used “manipulative
schemes” to transform money-losing power plants into “powerful profit centers.”
You
know a bank is in big trouble when the coverage of its activities includes
phrases like “lynch mob,” “sewer service” and “manipulative schemes.“
