NEW UPDATE: Millstone reactor shut-down, then re-started; more violations at Millstone; Millstone
& Pilgrim power plants in hot water; see how a nuclear “accident”
would affect you; mistaken identity; Fukushima “oops”
By
Will Collette
UPDATE, August 15: Millstone's Unit #3 re-started this morning after a four and a half day shut-down. The Unit automatically shut down last Friday due to an electrical fault that cut the amount of cooling water going to the reactor. Without cooling water, very bad things can happen. The operator pointedly noted the shut-down was NOT an emergency, since the safety back-up worked to shut down the reactor.
UPDATE: The Associated Press reports this morning that the Millstone power plant's Unit 3 reactor was shut down on Friday night and stayed shut through Monday. The Unit automatically shut down when a malfunction disrupted the flow of cooling water to the reactor. Last summer, it was Unit 2 that was shut down when its cooling water's temperature exceeded NRC standards
UPDATE, August 15: Millstone's Unit #3 re-started this morning after a four and a half day shut-down. The Unit automatically shut down last Friday due to an electrical fault that cut the amount of cooling water going to the reactor. Without cooling water, very bad things can happen. The operator pointedly noted the shut-down was NOT an emergency, since the safety back-up worked to shut down the reactor.
UPDATE: The Associated Press reports this morning that the Millstone power plant's Unit 3 reactor was shut down on Friday night and stayed shut through Monday. The Unit automatically shut down when a malfunction disrupted the flow of cooling water to the reactor. Last summer, it was Unit 2 that was shut down when its cooling water's temperature exceeded NRC standards
NRC cites Millstone for three more violations
Call me a cynic, but when regulators issue notices of violations to a potentially dangerous company, I am rarely reassured. The Nuclear Regulatory Commission cited our local nuke, the Millstone power station just 20 miles upwind from us just outside of New London on August 8.
The violations related to broken radiation monitoring equipment and Millstone's failure to notify the NRC about the problem. The NRC described these violations as having "very low safety significance." Perhaps the NRC's nonchalance about these violations has to do with such failures being commonplace, but I take little comfort in that. To me, any violation at a nuclear power plant is serious because the consequences are so dire.
Last
summer, the Millstone nuclear power plant just 20 miles upwind from
Charlestown, had to shut down
for two weeks in August because the ocean water it used to cool reactor
Unit #2 was too hot. Global warming. If the water is too hot to cool the
reactor, very bad things could happen.
Millstone’s
response to the shut-down was to announce that it planned to petition the
Nuclear Regulatory Commission for a change in the rules so it could use hotter
ocean water (a 5 degree increase from 75 to 80 degrees). On July 30, the NRC notified
Millstone’s owner, Virginia-based Dominion Energy, that its
application for the rule change was complete and now the NRC would proceed to
review their request.
The
Pilgrim nuclear power plant in Plymouth, MA (where Charlestown’s Town
Administrator Mark Stankiewicz had his last job) has already had to power down
on July 17-18 when water it draws from Cape Cod Bay exceeded 75 degrees.
Pilgrim spokesperson Carol Wightman told the Boston Globe that Pilgrim is
concerned about the rest of the summer.
Charlestown
has been obsessed for months about the possible effects of having two large
wind turbines sited in our midst. Personally, I’m more concerned about what
might happen if there’s a problem at the Millstone nuke, given its colorful
history.
Further,
as a Boomer growing up, we lived with the specter of nuclear attack and that,
of course, haunted our generation. I often thought of the likely targets for a
nuclear attack and what that might do to me.
Now
we live in the age of terrorism, which actually is a lot older than the period
since 9/11. As I wrote
recently,
New London was actually being seriously considered as a nuclear target in 1978 by
a band of idiots who plotted to highjack a nuclear submarine.
There’s
a macabre new on-line tool that can help you indulge your nuclear fears or
fantasies called Nukemap. You can zero in and pick
your target (I used my house), select your choice of nuclear weapon, click on
“Detonate” and see what would happen.
You can pick various special effects that
allow you to see the likely casualty count, blast, heat and shock damage and
the path of the nuclear cloud based on prevailing wind direction. If you pick
New London based on its military value, the 1978 nuclear plot and the Millstone
power plant, you can see how far the cloud of radioactivity would go.
Fun
for the whole family.
Other ways
things could go wrong
These guys do not like each other |
Even
though the US and Russia have reduced the size of their nuclear arsenals, and
generally, the threat of nuclear war is far less than it was during the Cold
War, it has not gone away. Two facts dominate: first, there are still more than
enough nuclear weapons in circulation to destroy the Earth many times over.
Second, some of the countries that hold nuclear weapons scare the shit out of
me.
Take
India, for example. India and Pakistan have been in a state of constant
hostilities since they were partitioned after the British left the
subcontinent. Both countries have nuclear weapons pointed at each other. Both
have enough nukes to destroy each other and themselves, and then some.
Both
have shaky controls over those weapons, in the case of India, allowing field
commanders the ability to launch without receiving orders from the central
government. Both sides have religious zealots who believe their deity would
welcome the extermination of the other side. Such deep-rooted religious hatreds
can override any reasonable sense of self-interest or even self-preservation.
On
July 25, the BBC reported that for six
months, Indian troops on the border frontier were on high alert over what they
believed to be invading drones coming either from its long-time enemy Pakistan,
but more likely coming from its other international foe, China.
The
Indian Army reported 329 sightings of these unidentified and presumably hostile
objects. However, after research done by the Indian Institute of Astrophysics,
it turned out that what the Army had been seeing were the planets Jupiter and
Venus.
During
the Cold War, there were numerous close calls when natural phenomena (e.g.
meteors) or innocent man-made objects (e.g. weather balloons) were mistaken for
in-coming ICBMS and pushed either Soviet or US nuclear forces to the brink of
launching a civilization-killing nuclear war. Now we have nuclear-armed India raising the alarm over planetary sightings.
Welcome
to the 21st Century.
Surprise,
Surprise
After
months of denial, Tokyo Electric
Power admitted that radioactive water was indeed leaking into the sea from its
crippled Fukushima nuclear power plant which was devastated by Japan’s horrific
earthquake and tsunami.
The plant lost power to draw cooling water from the
ocean (see story, above, regarding the Millstone and Pilgrim nuclear power
plants) to cool its reactors and radioactive waste pools. The waste pools
exploded and at least one reactor core melted down.
But
TEPCO has been using the standard industry line that “there’s no cause for
alarm” ever since it happened. Admitting the obvious was a big step for them,
though hardly exculpatory.
And their statement was far from totally candid:
TEPCO spokesman Masayuki
Ono told reporters "We are very
sorry for causing concerns. We have made efforts not to cause any leak to the
outside, but we might have failed to do so,"
Reuters reports that TEPCO's tepid admission is sparking outrage. According to Shinji Kinjo, head of the government's Nuclear Regulatory Authority, TEPCO's "sense of crisis is weak. This is why you can't just leave it up to TEPCO alone...Right now, we have an emergency."
Reuters reports that TEPCO's tepid admission is sparking outrage. According to Shinji Kinjo, head of the government's Nuclear Regulatory Authority, TEPCO's "sense of crisis is weak. This is why you can't just leave it up to TEPCO alone...Right now, we have an emergency."