 |
| Sea level rise and Providence |
More
than 40% of these prodigious costs could fall upon just four cities – New
Orleans, Miami and New York in the US and Guangzhou in China.
Stephane
Hallegatte of the World Bank in Washington and colleagues
looked at the risks of future flood losses in the 136 largest of the world’s
coastal cities.
Any coastal city is always at some risk – by definition it is at sea level, and often on an estuary or floodplain, and very often began as a seaport.
But
risks increase as the environment changes: some coastal cities are subsiding;
sea levels are slowly but surely rising as the oceans warm and the glaciers
melt; and for two decades researchers have repeatedly warned that what used to
be “extreme” events such as once-in-a-century floods are likely to arrive
considerably more often than once a century.
More at risk
But,
Hallegatte and colleagues point out in Nature Climate Change,
there is another factor: populations are growing, and even in the poorest
nations there is greater economic development. At bottom, for any future disaster,
there will be more potential victims, with more investment to lose.
In
2005, average global flood losses are estimated to have reached $6 billion a
year. This figure is expected to grow to $50 billion a year, and unless cities
put money into better flood defences, losses could pass the $1 trillion mark.
To
make their calculations, the authors matched average annual losses (and in a
city like New Orleans, much of it already below sea level, this is estimated at
$600 million) against a city’s gross domestic product, to provide a measure of
how much should be set aside to pay for such losses.
Both New York and New Orleans have already undergone
catastrophic flooding this century, and flood hazard can only increase.
Some
cities – Amsterdam in the Netherlands is a classic example – are highly exposed
to flood risk, and the once-a-century flood could cost the Dutch $83 billion,
but in fact Dutch sea defence standards are probably the highest in the world. Ho Chi Minh City in Vietnam and Alexandria in Egypt have less to lose, but in
relative terms both are far more vulnerable.
Prophecies
such as these are intended to be proved wrong: the idea is that a prophet warns
of horrors to come, people take steps, and as a consequence the horrors do not
arrive.
Not too late
But
as disaster professionals have learned again and again, governments, city
authorities, investors and even citizens tend not to listen to prophecies of
doom: scientists and engineers repeatedly described what could happen to New
Orleans if it was hit by a powerful-enough hurricane, and in 2005, as Hurricane
Katrina arrived, the levees gave way, with catastrophic results.
But,
the scientists warn, Miami, New York and New Orleans are especially vulnerable,
because wealth is high but protection systems are poor, and governments should
be prepared for disasters more devastating than any experienced today.
The
paper’s authors argue that with systematic preparedness and adaptation, annual
flood losses in the great global cities could be cut to $63 billion a year.
Engineering
projects can help, but will not be enough, so civic authorities should also be
thinking about disaster planning and comprehensive insurance programmes to
cover future losses.
Since
risks are highly concentrated – any city piles millions of people and billions
of dollars of investment into a relatively small area – flood reduction schemes
could be highly cost-effective.