Eye Contact May Make People More
Resistant to Persuasion
Making eye contact has long been
considered an effective way of drawing a listener in and bringing him or her
around to your point of view.
But new research shows that eye contact may actually make people more resistant to persuasion, especially when they already disagree. The new findings are published in Psychological Science, a journal of the Association for Psychological Science.
But new research shows that eye contact may actually make people more resistant to persuasion, especially when they already disagree. The new findings are published in Psychological Science, a journal of the Association for Psychological Science.
"There is a lot of cultural lore about the power of eye contact as an influence tool," says lead researcher Frances Chen, who conducted the studies at the University of Freiburg, Germany, and is now an assistant professor at the University of British Columbia. "But our findings show that direct eye contact makes skeptical listeners less likely to change their minds, not more, as previously believed," says Chen.
To investigate the effects of eye
contact in situations involving persuasion, Chen and colleagues took advantage
of recently developed eye-tracking technology.
They found that the more time
participants spent looking at a speaker's eyes while watching a video, the less
persuaded they were by the speaker's argument -- that is, participants'
attitudes on various controversial issues shifted less as they spent more time
focusing on the speaker's eyes.
Spending more time looking at the
speaker's eyes was only associated with greater receptiveness to the speaker's
opinion among participants who already agreed with the speaker's opinion on
that issue.
A second experimental study
confirmed these findings.
Participants who were told to look
at the speaker's eyes displayed less of a shift in attitudes than did those
participants who were told to look at the speaker's mouth. The results showed
that participants who looked at the speaker's eyes were less receptive to the
arguments and less open to interaction with the advocates of the opposing
views, and were thus more difficult to persuade.
According to Julia Minson of the
Harvard Kennedy School of Government, co-lead researcher of the studies, the
findings highlight the fact that eye contact can signal very different kinds of
messages depending on the situation.
While eye contact may be a sign of connection or trust in friendly situations, it's more likely to be associated with dominance or intimidation in adversarial situations.
While eye contact may be a sign of connection or trust in friendly situations, it's more likely to be associated with dominance or intimidation in adversarial situations.
So, while we might be tempted make
the demand, "Look at me when I'm talking to you!" of a listener, this
demand may have unintended consequences:
"Whether you're a politician or
a parent, it might be helpful to keep in mind that trying to maintain eye
contact may backfire if you're trying to convince someone who has a different
set of beliefs than you," says Minson.
The researchers are planning to look
at whether eye contact may be associated with certain patterns of brain
activity, the release of stress hormones, and increases in heart rate during
persuasion attempts.
"Eye contact is so primal that
we think it probably goes along with a whole suite of subconscious
physiological changes," says Chen.
Story Source:
Note: Materials may be edited for
content and length. For further information, please contact the source cited
above.
Journal Reference:
1.
F. S. Chen, J. A. Minson, M. Schone,
M. Heinrichs. In the Eye of the Beholder: Eye Contact Increases
Resistance to Persuasion. Psychological Science, 2013; DOI:10.1177/0956797613491968
Need
to cite this story in your essay, paper, or report? Use one of the following
formats:
APA
MLA
MLA
Association
for Psychological Science (2013, October 2). Eye contact may make people more
resistant to persuasion. ScienceDaily. Retrieved October 2, 2013,
from http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2013/10/131002092629.htm