Our expensive, illegal, and invasive spy program isn't even
helpful for stopping terrorism.
President
Barack Obama’s support for the NSA’s domestic spying program prompted a critic
to say: “Given the unique power of the state, it is not enough for leaders to
say: ‘Trust us, we won’t abuse the data we collect.’”
Oh wait, that
wasn’t a critic speaking — it was Obama
himself. In January, he tried to shush critics by insisting that the
threadbare slipcover of reforms he was throwing over the massive spy machine
should convince us that all is well. So please, people, just go back to sleep.
In a stunningly
blunt 238-page report, the five-member panel of legal experts
concluded that NSA’s bulk data collection is illegal, probably
unconstitutional under the First and Fourth Amendments, a serious, ongoing
threat to Americans’ privacy and liberties, and essentially useless at stopping
terrorist acts.
“As a result,”
wrote the panel’s majority, “the board recommends that the government end the
program.”
Especially
telling is the finding that NSA’s invasive phone sweeps constitute an
ineffectual anti-terrorism tool. The agency and its apologists keep claiming —
without any proof — that total vacuuming of domestic communications is
necessary to prevent the next 9/11 attack.
But the privacy
panel did an in-depth analysis of this repeated assertion, and wrote: “We have
not identified a single instance involving a threat to the United States in
which the telephone records program made a concrete difference.”
To get the whole
report, visit the agency’s website: www.pclob.gov.
OtherWords columnist Jim Hightower is
a radio commentator, writer, and public speaker. He’s also editor of the
populist newsletter, The Hightower
Lowdown. OtherWords.org