Three
Mile Island - 35 years later
From: Linda Pentz Gunter, Ecologist, in
ENN.com. More from this Affiliate
Today marks 35 years
since the meltdown at Unit 2 of the Three Mile Island (TMI) nuclear power plant
near Harrisburg, Pennsylvania. Despite the long passage of time, myths and
misinformation about the disaster still abound. Many questions may remain
permanently unanswered.
The consequences of the
TMI disaster were made more serious because, early on, emergency planning
officials were repeatedly misinformed about the disaster's progression and kept
in the dark about the need for public protective actions.
'No one died'
The often repeated
nuclear industry line - that"no one died at Three Mile Island" -
does not stand the test of fundamental medical scrutiny.
Yet, 35 years later, we
are hearing it again, put about by nuclear deniers who also claim that the
Chernobyl nuclear explosion harmed a mere handful and that the Fukushima
nuclear disaster in Japan will yield no fatalities.
Given what we know about
exposure to radiation, it is medically far more probable that there were
multiple fatalities as a result of TMI, as well as non-fatal cancers and other
illnesses.
The numbers will be
orders of magnitude higher as a result of the even more serious Chernobyl and
Fukushima nuclear catastrophes. There are other prematurely fatal outcomes too,
triggered by stress, dislocation and abandonment. None of these should be
callously discounted.
A 2-10 times increase in cancer incidence downwind
The two TMI studies - by
Columbia and Pittsburgh Universities - that have perpetuated the 'no harm'
myth, were conducted under the constraints of a court order that significantly
compromised the study findings.
The only independent
study, by Dr. Stephen Wing et al., found that lung cancer and leukemia rates
were two to 10 times higher downwind of the destroyed Three Mile Island reactor
than upwind.
This supports the
premise that far more radiation escaped from TMI than has been acknowledged by
the authorities.
Within hours of the
beginning of the nuclear disaster, onsite radiation monitors went off scale and
were shut down because radiation levels exceeded their measurement capacity.
Read more from our
affiliate, Ecologist.