By TIM
FAULKNER/ecoRI News staff
BRISTOL — Three years and four months into his one term
in office, Gov. Lincoln Chafee released a plan to address climate change in
Rhode Island.
The
57-page draft document is an across-the-board effort to focus public and
private entities on reducing heat-trapping gas emissions and managing climate
change-induced problems such as flooding. The report was
drawn up after a speedy two-month process that included 10 public meetings
organized by the Executive Climate Change Council (EC3), a committee of state
agency officials that Chafee authorized in late February.
If the
EC3 adopts the proposal — public comment ends May 20 — the council has
until the end of the year to fill in the specifics for a five-year climate
plan.
During
Chafee’s time in office, other efforts to tackle climate change, such as the
Climate Change Commission, have suffered from infighting and made little
progress — a lack of funding has often been noted as an obstacle. In recent
years, legislation to address climate change on a broad scale received little
support from the governor’s office and died in committee.
Massachusetts,
meanwhile, passed its Global Warming Solutions Act in 2008 and buttressed it with the
Green Jobs Act and Green Communities Act. All were part of a
first-in-the-nation climate plan that is credited with boosting economic growth
while addressing climate change.
At the
May 8 press event to mark the release of the climate plan “A Resilient Rhode
Island: Being Practical About Climate Change,” Chafee had an ambiguous answer
when asked why action on climate change was championed so late in his term.
Chafee
told ecoRI News that addressing climate change “was always a priority from day
one.” But, he added, his first order of business once taking office was to
improve the local economy and create jobs, implying that tackling climate
change wasn't considered a growth engine.
Yet, job
creation and economic development were benefits of the climate plan Chafee
touted at the recent Bristol event. “There are economic opportunities with
extreme weather and climate change. Let’s take advantage of those,” he said.
Allan
Klindworth of the environmental engineering firm AECOM, a global company that
designs green infrastructure in Rhode Island, said climate change impedes
commerce but “taking action to prepare for the issues of climate change reduces
costs and disruption. It can also quicken recovery, getting people back to work
faster and provide (economic) opportunities.”
Janet
Coit, director of the state Department of Environmental Management (DEM), the
lead agency on climate-change efforts and head of the EC3, said Chafee has had
climate change on his agenda from the beginning, but had to rebuild or
reorganize several state agencies before launching a master plan. Those efforts
included a revamped state master plan and new leadership at the Office of
Energy Resources and the Rhode Island Commerce Corporation.
Massachusetts,
meanwhile, brags about jobs and growth in its green sector, with an estimated
80,000 employees working at 5,500 firms, and consistent annual double-digit job
growth. The Bay State's climate legislation also triggered other programs, such
as successful solar initiatives that have exceeded growth targets for renewable
energy.
Massachusetts
launched its programs with $68 million in state funds. Rhode Island, by
contrast, has been in cost-cutting mode and relying on federal stimulus funds,
grants and parsing of existing budgets to improve its green programs and
initiatives.
Chafee’s
new climate plan, for the most part, mimics what Massachusetts did in 2008.
Oversight runs through the governor’s office. It sets benchmarks for reducing
greenhouse gas emissions, and offers guidance to municipalities on mitigation,
adaptation, renewable-energy and energy-efficiency efforts.
It promotes private
investment and partnerships, and supports new legislation for greenhouse gas
reductions and renewable-energy programs.
Other
highlights of the Resilient Rhode Island plan include: an eight-state,
zero-emission vehicle plan; promote renewable thermal fuels; study “resilient
microgrids” as backup power during power outages; shoreline and wetland
protections and restoration; new standards for land use; upgrade roadways, and
drinking water, wastewater and stormwater infrastructure.
What
does the report lack? There’s scant talk of dramatic reduction in fossil-fuel
use, an effort Massachusetts is undertaking. The Sierra Club of Rhode Island
says the emission reduction targets are inadequate and have been boosted simply
by the increased use of natural gas.
Abel
Collins, program manager for Sierra Club Rhode Island, acknowledged that
environmental groups like his shoulder some of the blame for the late start on
comprehensive reform, because they didn't explicitly lobby for a master plan.
But, he said, an all-inclusive climate program is better late than never.
“I don’t
think that would have happened without Chafee being in support of this,”
Collins said.