Look at the facts, make up your mind and then get out and VOTE!
If
you’ve been reading the Letters to the Editor columns of our local newspapers,
you may have seen a bunch of letters written by various members and
supporters of the Charlestown Citizens Alliance (CCA Party) calling Progressive Charlestown the "Hate Blog."
It seems as if this has become their #1 campaign issue, which makes sense, given that they really don't want anyone look at their record.
But putting so much emphasis on Progressive Charlestown - even though we're not running for office - actually works against the CCA Party not only by driving more readers to us, but exposing those readers to the seditious stuff we write.
It seems as if this has become their #1 campaign issue, which makes sense, given that they really don't want anyone look at their record.
But putting so much emphasis on Progressive Charlestown - even though we're not running for office - actually works against the CCA Party not only by driving more readers to us, but exposing those readers to the seditious stuff we write.
We dig behind the affairs of Charlestown town government
which has been controlled by the CCA Party since 2008. We examine their
plans, actions and claims.
We present an alternative point of view is spiced with humor, but backed by research and documentation. You'll usually find links to original documents in the articles, or screen shots of the documents.
We work our hardest to expose the contradictions between the CCA's noble words and ignoble acts. The CCA doesn't like that. An informed electorate needs more facts and more points of view, especially in a town that is so thoroughly controlled by just one political group.
We present an alternative point of view is spiced with humor, but backed by research and documentation. You'll usually find links to original documents in the articles, or screen shots of the documents.
We work our hardest to expose the contradictions between the CCA's noble words and ignoble acts. The CCA doesn't like that. An informed electorate needs more facts and more points of view, especially in a town that is so thoroughly controlled by just one political group.
So you can read, judge for yourself and make intelligent decisions, here
is “hateful” content that ran on Progressive
Charlestown over the past month:
Ethics,
Morality and the CCA Party covers the failure of CCA candidates to file
honest and accurate disclosure reports with the RI Ethics Commission.
Filippi
tries to cover up his extremist views and connections shows Blake Filippi’s ties to groups that want to end Social Security
and promote civil rebellion. Filippi has been all but endorsed by the CCA Party
in his efforts to unseat our able longtime representative Donna Walsh.
Charlestown
Taxes and the Election debunks
the CCA Party’s claims on Charlestown taxes which they've raised for six straight years while turning down a proposal for general relief for the middle-class.
CCA
files changes to report showing who REALLY owns the CCA Party shows you how the CCA Party is actually controlled by wealthy
non-residents who provide 60% of their funding.
Voter
fraud in South County by non-residents raises issues about whether non-residents are illegally voting in
Charlestown, or in Blake Filippi’s case, Block Island.
In
case you missed it: Charlestown's Chariho candidates exposes inconsistencies and likely resume inflation by CCA candidates
for Chariho School Committee. If they were students and did this, they might be
expelled.
See
for yourself - the evidence on Blake Filippi's election and voter fraud shows you the documents backing Rep. Walsh’s charges that Blake Filippi
does not live in the 36th District.
Understanding
the CCA Party, Part 3 continues
the on-going history of the CCA Party, its roots and core beliefs. Lots of
links. Lots of names named.
How
clean are local food establishments? This puts my blind hatred of tainted food on full display.
No
good deed goes unpunished shows
how the selfishness, greed and obsessiveness of the CCA Party and its followers
impacts children.
Carney
blasts Planning Commission for missing video and violating the law takes the CCA Party to task for its hypocrisy in claiming they run an
open and transparent government when they commit repeated open government
violations.
Things
you should know about red light cameras in Charlestown details how the town’s new system will work and also gives you a
background of how the system came to be adopted. I’ve been following this topic
closely because I HATE red-light runners. There's that word again.
Ruth
Platner leaves fingerprints catches
our Planning Commissar in the act of orchestrating the attack against the state
plan to acquire some undeveloped land and preserve it as open space for the
future use of the clean water underneath. Exposes Platner’s and the CCA’s
hypocrisy about the environment in general and open space in particular. Also
exposes Platner’s interest in bringing private land sales under town control.
Recycling
in Charlestown flops again is
another piece that shows the CCA Party’s stated environmental principles are
meaningless as Charlestown once again is worst in the state on the amount we
recycle.
How to easily find hate-filled content
Also, gratuitous kitten pictures |
Or
you can click on the button on the left labelled “Fact-Checking
the CCA.”
That’s where you’ll find the stuff the CCA hates the most.
We’ve
made it easier for you to get at our election coverage with one button, also on
the left, labelled “2014 Election.”
Or
you can go into Topics and get links
to all the articles on, for example, Boss Tom Gentz or Ethics
Meister Ron Areglado.
When
you’re trying to run a town government on a tissue of lies, of course you’re
not going to like some smart asses bringing up inconvenient truths or poking fun
at the puffed up characters who run this town, so the CCA Party’s violent
reaction to Progressive Charlestown is understandable. But it seems the thing
they hate most is humor.
Joking or not joking
One
of the things that I’ve liked the least about the CCA Party’s reign over
Charlestown is how they’ve sucked all of the joy out of the environment. Sadly,
they don’t know the difference between humor and hate, a terrible affliction I
call humorous dyscognition.
However, there
was a time very recently when I thought the CCA Party was actually going to try
to come to grips with their Stage Four case of Humorous Dyscognition by
engaging in some pretty funny political humor.
For
example, the Attorney General
recently ruled
– yet again – that the CCA Party leadership violated the Open Meetings Act by –
yet again – holding a
secret ballot during a public meeting. Planning Commissar Ruth Platner’s
reaction
was not to fess up and acknowledge the mistake. Instead, she decided to blame citizens
for not making more use of internet technology, like watching the video of
meetings on Clerkbase.
Here's her piece on the CCA Party website:
Here's her piece on the CCA Party website:
This is an honest-to-god screenshot from the CCA Party's website |
She wrote that essay AFTER she
put a discussion of the Attorney General’s decision on the Planning
Commission’s agenda for October 1. But a funny thing happened: the Clerkbase video for that entire discussion was cut off! That made me rotflmao because I simply couldn't believe it.
And
it gets even better. I tried to go back to that October 1 meeting as I was
writing this article and here’s what I got:
Screenshot from Clerkbase shows ALL
of it is gone. The video, the agenda, the document links. All of it. Maybe when she says "fully transparent," she means invisible. UPDATE: as of this writing (Nov. 3rd), the Clerkbase content on Platner's meeting is STILL GONE!
And
this was hardly the first time Ruth’s "fully transparent" internet solution has failed. The September 17 meeting
also had the front end cut off. The Planning Commission used to regularly cut off
Clerkbase video,
claiming that someone had “accidentally” pulled the plug.
Then
there’s the chronic problems
with Clerkbase
that you can access it only with certain web browsers (Internet Explorer, primarily)
and then have to employ a back-door technical fix. That’s beyond the skill set
of the average internet user. We’re supposed to get a new, more user-friendly recording
and records system called IQM2, but no sign of
that yet.
Thank you, Mike! |
The
other case of unintentional funniness was a letter to the editor by CCA Party
pundit and appointee to the Zoning Board of Review Mike Chambers.
He wrote a
piece called “A Sober Look at
Campaign Tactics”
that talks about the negative tactics of “strategic researchers and campaign
managers” – I assume he’s talking about me since I've performed both those roles over the past 40 years – for revealing negative things
about CCA Party candidates.
If
you read any of the articles I listed above, you’ll see prime examples of what
Chambers is talking about. In those articles, you’ll see document links, screen
shots, names named and details provided.
When I offer my opinion, it’s usually
obvious though sometimes I remove any doubt by saying “in my opinion.”
Chambers
lays out five rules for smart reading of political subject matter: (1) ignore
anyone who claims someone is lying unless they show you where and how; (2)
ignore any broad generalization unless the writer of the piece identifies
specific individuals and puts it in context; (3) separate fact from opinion;
(4) if there are conflicting stories “get the facts from someone who knows,”
presumably that’s Chambers, and (5) watch for global characterizations “because they are misleading and usually do
not apply” which is, in itself, a pretty good example of a global
characterization.
But
that said, it’s generally a fine list. The only problem – for Mike – is that if you apply this formula to the many pieces he has written either on
the CCA Party’s website or in the Sun’s Letters to the Editor column, nobody would pay any attention to anything
he’s written.
Charlestown
is a very lucky town to be so well endowed with so much beauty and so many
natural riches. We are wonderfully situated and still have an interesting and
diverse population.
I
stand and fight for all of that, and to make it better. I also stand and fight
against the dour, sour, humorless crowd that wants to turn Charlestown into an
exclusive retirement enclave where everyone speaks in hushed tones and never a
discouraging word is heard.
This
election, like every election, is a battle over vision and direction. Since 2008,
Charlestown voters have gone along with the CCA vision. That vision is of a Charlestown that is a seaside version of Sun City, Arizona where young
people are excluded and where you are only welcome if you meet their standards for residence. If you’re a person of color or working class, you
are welcome only so long as you are providing services to the residents and
you get out by sundown.
By the way, that's also the CCA Party's jobs plan - for people to work in the homes of the wealthy, absentee beachfront property owners. Read it for yourself (from one of their latest mailers):
The CCA's economic improvement plan |
They
call Progressive Charlestown “cyber-bullies” because we call them out and shine
a light on the truth. Let them actually come forward with their proof of competence, ethics and morality instead of just
talking about it.
And their odd proffer of a few negotiated collective
bargaining agreements is not it, in light of all the violations of open
government law, persistent tax hikes and wastes of public money, not to mention
their own bullying of honest citizens.
They
get to keep doing what they’ve been doing when the rest of Charlestown stays
home on Election Day. This election is important. Get your ass out there on
Tuesday and vote.