By TIM FAULKNER/ecoRI News staff
The wind turbine at Shalom Housing in Warwick, a rare example of a tie-in between affordable housing and green energy. |
PROVIDENCE — Missing from the recent growth of Rhode
Island’s solar and wind-energy sectors are renewable projects that serve
low-income residents.
Of the 100 or so projects built in recent years with state
subsidies, only a handful benefit affordable housing and low-income groups.
To address this deficiency, the state Office of Energy
Resources (OER) is looking to make its principal incentive program more
appealing to low-wage earners, as well as other members of the public who
aren’t aware of the renewable-energy programs and benefits.
“We have an obligation to assure that (these programs) align so that it’s functional in all communities,” Ken Payne, chairman of the Distributed Generation (DG) Contracts Board, the committee that oversees incentives for large wind and solar projects, said during a Feb. 25 board meeting.
During the past four years, which was considered a trial
period for the DG incentive program, no contracts were awarded to projects that
serve low-income families or affordable housing.
Three projects at affordable-housing developments, however,
received funding through the state Renewable Energy Fund (REF) and federal
economic stimulus money. In 2010, Shalom Housing Inc., a low-income apartment
for seniors in Warwick, received a modest REF grant for a 156-foot-high
100-kilowatt turbine, but the bulk of the funding came from the U.S. Department
of Housing and Urban Development (HUD).
Sandywoods Farm in Tiverton, an affordable-housing
development for artists, was awarded state and federal funds for a 275-kilowatt
wind turbine and a small solar array. The West Elmwood Housing Development
Corporation received $100,000 from REF in 2009 for a 50-kilowatt solar project.
Last year, however, the General Assembly expanded the DG
program to include smaller residential solar installations, wind and other
renewable projects. And now the DG board says it wants low-income groups to
have a chance to benefit from these incentives.
“Certainly, this is a market we’d like to tap into,” said
Chris Kearns, chief of programing development at OER.
Kearns noted that low-income groups, along with all
electric customers, are paying for the incentives through slightly higher rates
and charges on their utility bill.
“Ultimately, they are contributing to the cost of the
program being in operation every year,“ he said.
But the DG program, as well as REF grants, have several
obstacles to clear before they are suited for low-income groups.
The 30 percent federal tax credit is the largest single subsidy for most
renewable-energy projects. But entities can’t qualify for the credit if they
receive federal funds. This typically omits affordable-housing buildings and
organizations, as well as many nonprofits.
Virtual net metering allows a renewable-energy project to assign its power to
other entities. For example, a solar field can assign the credit earned from
its electricity to a low-income housing project or nonprofit. The value of that
electricity is simply deducted from that group’s electric bill.
Massachusetts allows virtual net metering and many affordable-housing groups benefit from the cheaper cleaner power. Rhode Island only permits cities and towns to use virtual net metering.
Massachusetts allows virtual net metering and many affordable-housing groups benefit from the cheaper cleaner power. Rhode Island only permits cities and towns to use virtual net metering.
Solar developer Fred Unger told the DG board that virtual
net metering has been a catalyst for building 69 solar projects in
Massachusetts that benefit affordable-housing groups. In 2015, he expects to
install a whopping 5.5 megawatts of new solar projects to serve affordable
housing in the Bay State.
Rhode Island, he said, must expand virtual net metering.
Otherwise, “the DG program is going to be really difficult to make work in the
affordable-housing market,” Unger said.
Many affordable and low-income and dwellings are in dense urban areas with
small roofs and inadequate sunshine and thus aren’t ideal for solar panels,
Unger said. Multi-family homes also pose complications between tenants,
landlords and developers regarding roof access and who can take advantage of
the solar energy.
Virtual net metering, Unger said, can circumvent this
problem by allowing larger projects in open areas to include urban residents.
Community groups that promote financial incentives to first-time and low-income
homeowners aren’t aware of the renewable-energy incentives and aren’t passing
them along to homebuyers.
“There is an education component that I don’t think is just
unique to low-income (groups), but just the general population,” said Sharon
Conrad-Wells, executive director of the West Elmwood Housing Development
Corporation.
She suggested that state housing organizations, such as the Housing Network of Rhode Island, help educate homebuyers
and financial-education groups. “I think having us understand how the money
works can help us make sure that what we are doing can be useful,” Conrad-Wells
said.
Julian Dash, owner of solar developer Clean Energy Economy
Development LLC, has considerable experience in Rhode Island’s relatively young
renewable-energy industry. He was the former head of the REF and also was a
financing consultant to housing authorities in Washington, D.C., and Baltimore.
Dash believes the DG program can ultimately be used to help affordable housing.
“It’s complex but not impossible,” he said. “I’m quite
confident that it could be done. You just have to get the resources to work it
out.”
As one solution, Kearns suggested making the DG program
offer higher fixed price agreements that compensate for the lack of the federal
tax credit, an incentive that may run out for all renewable projects at the end
of 2016.
At its March meeting, the DG board is expected to begin
forming a working group to address these problems and ultimately spread the
word about the benefits and financing available for renewable-energy projects.