Fulminations
on our frozen tundra
By
Will Collette
As we prepare the daily chore of digging out from yet another of the endless stream of storms that have hit us since January 19, a number of thoughts come to mind. Like the need to be careful, the costs we are incurring and how it ties in with our attitudes and policies toward taxes and climate change.
Among
the consequences of our historic winter is that the unforeseen demands of plowing,
shoveling, pickaxing ice, clearing decks and roofs, making sure the birds are
fed, etc. is the crimp it has put in my ability to write and research. I’m sure
that’s just fine with the CCA Party and others, such as our nomadic state Rep
Flip Filippi. But I do feel some sense of failed responsibility to Progressive
Charlestown readers.
I’m
also concerned that we don’t get so numb or blasé about the weather that we
fail to be careful. There’s a keen risk of heart attack among those vulnerable
and injury from falls. I already took one hard spill. I suggest taking a look
at the storm advice we ran a few weeks ago in Progressive Charlestown (click
here).
Also,
I highly recommend Yak-Trax as a way to avoid falls. These
are ice cleats – rubber chords covered with steel springs – that slip over your
boots or shoes. They are available from Amazon
and elsewhere and work great. There are other slip-on ice cleats on the market –
they probably work too, but I can give my personal endorsement to Yak-Trax.
Remember
to keep
good records of your storm-related damages and losses in case there is a
federal emergency declaration that includes some possibility of reimbursement.
The state will reimburse you if DOT plows destroy your mailbox (click
here to find out how). If the town DPW caused you damage, lots of luck
unless you are a major CCA Party supporter.
The
state
may also reimburse you for damage to your vehicle from the amazing new
collection of potholes we’re seeing all over our state roads. Even the new
stretch of pavement in and out of Wakefield took a hit with frost heaves that
made driving feel like negotiating the moguls in a free-style skiing course.
The
weather has also triggered more esoteric political thinking, such as the
upcoming debate over Rep.
Bob Craven’s Democratic leadership bill to eliminate state income tax on retirement income.
Even
though Cathy and I have virtually no other income other than retirement and
Social Security and we stand to gain a lot from this, I am unconvinced it is in
the public interest, especially with the state facing another large deficit.
The
idea given by Craven, as well as by the Republican backers (including Flip
Filippi) of the Republican
version, is that cutting taxes on retirement income will stop older people
from moving out of Rhode Island to, for example, Florida. Really? I think the
best counter-argument to that is to look out the window.
In
study after study, affordable housing and climate are the top reasons why
retirees move South, not taxes, and this winter makes the case as strongly as
it can possibly be made. I suspect that this proposed tax cut won’t make it,
especially when the General Assembly starts to grapple with the real budget
numbers.
Further,
the elderly who need the most relief – those whose only income is Social
Security – already have incomes that are too low to tax. It’s the upper bracket
retirees – those with pensions, IRAs and 401(k) plans plus Social Security –
who would see the benefit but need it the least.
And
besides, this is not an election year and the shrewder of the General Assembly
members will recognize that if they pass it this year, voters (especially the
older voters who are the intended beneficiaries) may not remember it next year.
Unless, of course, the tax cuts cause chaos that carries over into 2016. Next
year, the chances for adoption of a retirement income tax cut are much
likelier.
Finally,
this awful weather makes me think of the missed opportunities we have had as a
society and as a local community to fully embrace the necessary changeover to a
low carbon energy culture.
Ignorant
people like Senator
Jim Inhofe (R-Oklahoma) see this horrible winter as evidence that climate
change is a hoax when in fact the
opposite is true.
Watch here to see Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse take Inhofe's silly arguments apart:
Our
winter storms are due to a shift in the jet stream caused by the fast-paced
warming of the Arctic region. The so-called “polar vortex” usually spins
tightly around the pole, but as the polar region warms faster than in our
mid-latitudes, the vortex churns south and sends storm after storm barreling along
the dip in the jet stream, hammering us with record snow and cold.
We
must stop making this problem worse by drastically cutting our carbon emissions
through conservation and to a rapid and wholesale switch to green energy.
Every
community must do its share. On that score, I am ashamed that Charlestown,
despite all its claims of environmental conscience, has done so poorly. It’s
not just the NIMBY fight against the Whalerock wind project but our official
town policies that make the shift to renewable energy so difficult. It’s
our dreadful
recycling efforts. It’s our lack of public transportation that forces a
total reliance on private vehicles.
Obviously
this bad winter and the bad winters to come are not all Charlestown’s (or even
the CCA Party’s) fault – that’s an overreach that even I will not attempt. But
we have failed to do our fair share.
But,
on the other hand, we know we can do better. I am hopeful that this town, as it
tallies up the costs we have incurred in over-time, road treatment, broken plows,
property damage and general weariness, will think seriously about the practical
things we can do now so that we indeed do our fair share to deal with climate
change.
Otherwise,
what right do we have to complain?