Eliminating the Burden of Predatory Student Debt
By
Phil Mattera, Dirt
Diggers Digest
For more cartoons by Ted Rall, CLICK HERE. |
Over the course of 20 years, Corinthian, once a Wall Street
darling, built an empire of some 100 schools offering dubious post-secondary
career training programs to hundreds of thousands of students across the
country. The company deceived applicants into signing up for expensive degrees
of questionable value in landing good jobs, much of which made possible by the
availability of what amounted to predatory federal student loans.
There have been questions about Corinthian’s practices for more than a decade. By 2004 the company was being investigated by the U.S. Department of Education and the attorney general of California, where the company was based. A narrowly focused SEC probe went nowhere, but more state cases were launched, along with student-initiated lawsuits.
California finally brought suit against Corinthian in 2013, accusing it of false and predatory
advertising, securities fraud and intentional misrepresentations to students.
At the same time, however, a federal appeals court ruled that the plaintiffs in the separate
student lawsuits had to take their claims to arbitration, a process known for
favoring corporations.
In 2014, under pressure from federal and state regulators,
Corinthian began selling off its campuses or phasing
them out. The company was then sued by the federal Consumer Financial
Protection Bureau for illegal predatory lending. This helped bring about an
announcement by Zenith Education Group, which had purchased many of
Corinthian’s remaining properties, that it would forgive 40 percent of
outstanding student loans.
Yet that was not enough. There were growing calls to cancel all the
debt of Corinthian students. Some of those students did not wait for officials
to act; they launched a debt strike. It was in this
context that the Obama Administration’s action finally came, though the
strikers are disappointed that the Education
Department is not simply discharging the debt outright but is instead setting
up a bureaucratic application process.
It may be hard to believe but there was once a movement called
Wages for Students, which argued not
only that those in school should not have to take on debt but they should in
fact get compensated for the time spent being prepared to be more useful for a
future employer.
That view lost out to the ideology of personal responsibility
and the mistaken notion that the average person can borrow his or her way to
prosperity — a notion was exploited by predatory operators such as Corinthian
using the federal government as their enablers and their collection agencies.
It is a positive development that the discussion has shifted
from simple debt alleviation to the alternative of debt cancellation, but the
process should not stop with Corinthian, which was egregious but not unique.
There are plenty of other for-profit educational companies that have saddled
students with debt for degrees of questionable value, or in many cases no
degree at all.
The federal government did a lousy job addressing the predatory
lending in the housing sector that contributed to the financial meltdown and
seriously damaged the economic well-being of much of the population. Now it
should make up for that failing by doing an aggressive and thorough job of
eliminating abusive student debt once and for all.