Long-term exposure to tiny amounts of Roundup—thousands of times lower than what is permitted in U.S. drinking water—may lead to serious problems in the liver and kidneys, according to a new study.
The study looked at the function of genes in these organs and bolsters a controversial 2012 study that found rats exposed to small amounts of the herbicide Roundup in their drinking water had liver and kidney damage.
It
is the first to examine the impacts of chronic, low exposure of Roundup on
genes in livers and kidneys and suggests another potential health impact for
people and animals from the widely used weed killer.
“Given even very low levels of exposure, Roundup can potentially result in organ damage when it comes to liver and kidney function,” said senior author Michael Antoniou, head of the Gene Expression and Therapy Group at King’s College London.
“The
severity we don’t know, but our data say there will be harm given enough time,”
he said.
It’s
the latest health concern for the most widely used herbicide in the United
States.
Evidence has been mounting that Roundup’s main ingredient, glyphosate,
is toxic. In recent years, scientists have increasingly suspected it might be
at least partially behind a widespread
kidney disease epidemic in Sri Lanka and parts of India and
Central America.
Meanwhile,
use of the herbicide has skyrocketed, increasing more
than 250 times over the past four decades in the U.S.,
according to estimates.
Glyphosate has increasingly made headlines as the debate on genetically modified foods ramps up because many seeds from Monsanto, Roundup’s manufacturer, are genetically engineered to withstand the herbicide.
Glyphosate has increasingly made headlines as the debate on genetically modified foods ramps up because many seeds from Monsanto, Roundup’s manufacturer, are genetically engineered to withstand the herbicide.
Both
health researchers and environmental groups have called on governments to
either ban or more strictly regulate glyphosate, especially after the World
Health Organization’s International Agency for Research on Cancer in March
determined glyphosate is probably cancer-causing in humans.
In
the 2012 study, different groups of rats were fed mixtures of genetically
modified corn and Roundup. Researchers, led by Gilles-Éric Séralini, a
professor of molecular biology at the University of Caen in France, reported
cancers and other health impacts from both the corn itself and the herbicide.
But
the experiment design and results were highly controversial; the paper was
retracted and eventually republished last
year.
Among
other findings, the original experiment showed that very tiny amounts of
Roundup added to rats’ water—a dose that is thousands of times lower than what
is allowed in U.S. drinking water—for two years seemed to spur kidney and liver
damage.
In
the current study, Antoniou and colleagues compared the female mice from the
2012 group and found big differences in their genes compared to rats that were
not fed Roundup.
“There
were more than 4,000 genes in the liver and kidneys whose levels of expression
had changed” in the dosed rats compared to the non-dosed rats, Antoniou
said. Genes serve as the body's switches, controlling different functions.
Turn one gene off at the wrong time, or fail to turn it on at the proper time,
and serious consequences could happen. Different patterns of gene function are
known to underlie the health and disease status of organs.
Given
that they “used very low dose levels in drinking water, as a country that uses
a lot of glyphosate and it’s found widely across U.S. streams, this study
should have some kind of public health influence,” said Nichelle Harriott,
science and regulatory director at Beyond Pesticides, a Washington D.C.-based
nonprofit organization that advocates against toxic pesticides.
While
the number of genes was high, the actual changes in levels of expression
between the dosed and non-dosed group were pretty small. “We don’t know what to
make of such changes, they may be meaningful and may not,” said Bruce Blumberg,
a professor and researcher at the University of California who was not involved
in the study.
Antoniou
and colleagues can’t pin the specific organ problems to glyphosate. The changes
they saw in the genes are linked to the types of organ damage originally seen
in the rats—such as scarring and dead tissue.
“They
can’t say which caused what, but what you have is an association—the group
treated with a little Roundup had a lot of organ damage and the gene expression
findings supported that,” Blumberg said.
Monsanto
did not return requests to comment on Antoniou’s study. The company has
repeatedly maintained Roundup’s safety and attacked the
science behind the WHO’s decision to label glyphosate a
probable carcinogen.
The
findings, while in rats, are concerning for people. These tests are the kind
used to test what chemicals may do to humans, Antoniou said, which is
concerning given glyphosate's widespread use.
“Normally
when you see negative effects in these rats from a chemical treatment, then you
get very worried,” he said. “And normally you would consider whether to approve
the use of the chemical or not.”
For
questions or feedback about this piece, contact Brian Bienkowski at bbienkowski@ehn.org.
