If
political speech is measured in million-dollar campaign contributions, then by
definition it isn’t free.
In today’s so-called “democratic” election process, Big Money
doesn’t talk, it roars — usually drowning out the people’s voice.
Bizarrely, the Supreme Court decreed in its 2010 Citizens United ruling that money is a form of “free
speech.” Thus, declared the learned justices, people and corporations are
henceforth allowed to spend unlimited sums of their money to “speak” in
election campaigns.
But wait — if political speech is measured by money, then by
definition speech isn’t free. It can be bought, thereby giving the most speech
to the few with the most money.
That’s plutocracy, not democracy.
The top 158 of them totaled $176 million in political spending —
meaning that on average, each one of them bought more than a million dollars’
worth of “free” speech.
Nearly all of their money is backing Republican presidential
hopefuls who promise to cut taxes on the rich, slash regulations that protect
us from corporate pollution and other abuses of the common good, and roll back
Social Security, food stamps, and other safety-net programs that we un-rich
people need.
The great majority of Americans adamantly oppose all of those
cuts. But none of us has a million bucks we can spend to buy an equivalent
amount of political speech.
It’s not just some good public programs that are endangered by
the court’s ridiculous ruling, but democracy itself.
That’s why a new poll by Bloomberg Politics found
that 78 percent of the American people — including 80 percent of Republicans —
want to overturn Citizens United.
To help make this happen, go to www.FreeSpeechForPeople.org.
OtherWords
columnist Jim Hightower is a radio commentator, writer, and public speaker.
He’s also the editor of the populist newsletter, The Hightower Lowdown. OtherWords.org.