Campaigns
are hiring “donor maintenance managers” as personal concierges to millionaire
supporters.
By
Already, candidates are walled off from people, reality, and any
honesty about themselves by a battalion of highly specialized consultants
controlling everything from issues to hairstyle. But now comes a whole new
category of staff to add to the menagerie: “donor maintenance manager.”
We can thank the Supreme Court for this. Its malevolent Citizens United decision produced an insidious
platinum class of mega-donors and corporate super PACs, each pumping $500,000,
$5 million, $50 million — or even more — into campaigns.
These elites aren’t silent donors. They’re boisterous, very special interests playing in this court-created political money game for their own gain.
Having paid to play, they feel entitled to tell candidates what
to say and do, what to support and oppose. A Jeb Bush insider confirms that
mega-donors bluntly tell the candidate: “I
just invested in you. Now I need to have my say; you need to answer to me.”
Thus, campaigns are hiring donor maintenance managers as
personal concierges to meet every need and whim of these special ones. This
subservience institutionalizes the plutocratic corruption of our democratic
elections, allowing a handful of uber-rich interests to buy positions of
overbearing influence directly inside campaigns.
Donors at the million-dollar-and-up level are expecting much
more than a tote bag for their “generous gifts.”
Of course, candidates piously proclaim, “I’m not for sale.” But
politicians are just the delivery service. The actual products being bought
through the Supreme Court’s political bazaar are our government’s policies, tax
breaks, and other goodies — as well as the integrity of America’s democratic
process.
OtherWords
columnist Jim Hightower is a radio commentator, writer, and public speaker.
He’s also the editor of the populist newsletter, The Hightower Lowdown, and a member of the Public
Citizen board. OtherWords.org.