For
banksters like Goldman Sachs, federal criminal settlements are just a cost of
doing business.
That’s the stunning amount Goldman Sachs has agreed to pay to
settle federal criminal charges over its shameful financial scams, which helped
wreck America’s economy in 2008. That’s a lot of gold, even for Goldman.
Yet the Wall Street powerhouse says it’s “pleased” to swallow this sour slug of medicine. Is that
because its executives are contrite? Oh, come on — banksters don’t do contrite.
Rather, they’re pleased with the settlement. Thanks to backroom
dealing with friendly prosecutors, it’s riddled with loopholes that may
eliminate nearly $2 billion from the publicized punishment.
Also, about $2.5 billion of the settlement is to be paid to
consumers hurt by the financial crisis. Yet the deal lets the bank deduct
almost $1 billion of this payout from its corporate tax. That means you and I
will subsidize Goldman’s payment.
As a bank reform advocate told The New York Times, the problem with these settlements “is that they are carefully
crafted more to conceal than to reveal to the American public what really
happened here.”
One more reason Wall Street bankers privately wink and grin at
these seemingly huge punishments is that even paying the full $5 billion would
be perfectly manageable. To you and me, it sounds like a crushing sum — but
Goldman Sachs raked in over $33 billion in revenue last year alone. For them,
it’s a reasonable cost of doing business.
After all, Goldman sold tens of billions of dollars’ worth of
fraudulent investment packages leading to the settlement. The bottom line is
that crime can pay, if it’s big enough.
OtherWords
columnist Jim Hightower is a radio commentator, writer, and public speaker.
He’s the editor of the populist newsletter, The Hightower Lowdown. OtherWords.org.