Until the feds
charge reckless bankers individually, they'll shake down shareholders to bail
them out for misdeeds.
Sure, they went belly-up and crashed our economy with their
greed.
And, yes, Washington bailed them out, while ignoring the plight
of workaday people who lost jobs, homes, businesses, wealth, and hope.
But come on, buckos. Haven’t you noticed that the feds are now
socking the banksters with huge penalties for their wrongdoings?
Wall Street powerhouse Goldman Sachs, for example, was recently
punched in its corporate gut with a jaw-dropping $5 billion punishment for its
illegal schemes.
It’s hard to comprehend that much money, so think of it like
this: If you paid out $100,000 every day, it would take you nearly 28 years to
pay off just $1 billion.
So imagine having to pull five big Bs out of your wallet. That should make even the most arrogant and avaricious high-finance flim-flammer think twice before risking such scams.
So these negotiated settlements between the feds and the big
banks will effectively deter repeats of the 2008 Wall Street debacle, right?
Actually, no.
Notice that the $5 billion punishment is applied to Goldman
Sachs, not to the “Goldman Sackers.” The bank’s shareholders have to cough up
the penalty, rather than the executives who did the bad deeds.
Remember, banks don’t commit crimes — bankers do.
Yet Goldman CEO Lloyd Blankfein just awarded himself a $23 million paycheck for
his work last year. That work essentially amounted to negotiating a deal with
the government to make shareholders pay for the bankers’ wrongdoings — while he
and other top executives keep their jobs and keep pocketing millions.
What a great example for young financial executives. With no
punishment, the next generation of banksters can view Blankfein’s story as a
model for Wall Street success, rather than a deterrent to corruption.
OtherWords
columnist Jim Hightower is a radio commentator, writer, and public speaker.
He’s the editor of the populist newsletter, The Hightower
Lowdown. OtherWords.org.