Tufts University, Health Sciences Campus
Butter consumption was only weakly associated with total
mortality, not associated with cardiovascular disease, and slightly inversely
associated (protective) with diabetes, according to a new epidemiological study
which analyzed the association of butter consumption with chronic disease and
all-cause mortality.
This systematic review and meta-analysis, published in PLOS ONE, was led by Tufts scientists
including Laura Pimpin, Ph.D., former postdoctoral fellow at the Friedman
School of Nutrition Science and Policy at Tufts in Boston, and senior author
Dariush Mozaffarian, M.D., Dr.P.H., dean of the School.
Based on a systematic review and search of multiple online academic and medical databases, the researchers identified nine eligible research studies including 15 country-specific cohorts representing 636,151 unique individuals with a total of 6.5 million person-years of follow-up.
Over the total follow-up
period, the combined group of studies included 28,271 deaths, 9,783 cases of
cardiovascular disease, and 23,954 cases of new-onset type 2 diabetes.
The researchers combined the nine studies into a meta-analysis
of relative risk.
Butter
consumption was standardized across all nine studies to 14 grams/day, which
corresponds to one U.S. Department of Agriculture estimated serving of butter
(or roughly one tablespoon).
Overall, the average butter consumption across the nine studies
ranged from roughly one-third of a serving per day to 3.2 servings per day. The
study found mostly small or insignificant associations of each daily serving of
butter with total mortality, cardiovascular disease, and diabetes.
"Even
though people who eat more butter generally have worse diets and lifestyles, it
seemed to be pretty neutral overall," said Pimpin, now a data analyst in
public health modelling for the UK Health Forum.
"This suggests that butter may be a
"middle-of-the-road" food: a more healthful choice than sugar or
starch, such as the white bread or potato on which butter is commonly spread
and which have been linked to higher risk of diabetes and cardiovascular
disease; and a worse choice than many margarines and cooking oils -- those rich
in healthy fats such as soybean, canola, flaxseed, and extra virgin olive oils
-- which would likely lower risk compared with either butter or refined grains,
starches, and sugars."
"Overall,
our results suggest that butter should neither be demonized nor considered
"back" as a route to good health," said Mozaffarian.
"More research is needed to better understand the observed
potential lower risk of diabetes, which has also been suggested in some other
studies of dairy fat. This could be real, or due to other factors linked to
eating butter -- our study does not prove cause-and-effect."