An infamous
Supreme Court ruling once denied African Americans any and all rights as human
beings. Has anything changed?
For more cartoons by Mike Luckovich, CLICK HERE |
In 1857, the Supreme Court was tasked with deciding whether
Scott, an African American man born into slavery, should be granted his
freedom.
The justices not only denied Scott’s request, but also took the opportunity to send a chilling message to all African Americans, free and enslaved, that reverberates to this day.
The justices not only denied Scott’s request, but also took the opportunity to send a chilling message to all African Americans, free and enslaved, that reverberates to this day.
The court held that as members of an inferior race, African
Americans were not citizens at all — and, as such, did not even have legal
standing to sue. African Americans, as Chief Justice Roger Taney so decisively
determined, had “no rights which the white man was bound to respect.”
The next century was characterized by an ongoing struggle to
prove Taney wrong.
African American heroism during the Civil War era hastened the passage of the Thirteenth, Fourteenth, and Fifteenth Amendments, which ended slavery and (theoretically) reversed race-based restrictions on citizenship. Yet these gains were negated almost as quickly as they were realized, as the strong grip of Jim Crow choked communities throughout the South.
Over the violent decades that followed, African Americans
endured church bombings, harassment,
and police beatings
and animal attacks, like the brutalities inflicted on those marching
across the Edmund Pettus Bridge in 1965.
This sacrifice of the black body,
along with sustained lobbying, ultimately led to the enactment of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Voting Rights Act of 1965.
Yet even today, second-class citizenship continues. It shows up
in generational poverty, a disparate education system, mass incarceration, and
violence at the hands of police.
In fact, African Americans are three times as likely as whites to be killed by police,
even though they’re twice as likely to be unarmed. That’s produced a slew of
names that, like Dred Scott’s, may loom over our history for centuries because
of the rights they were denied.
In 2012, Trayvon Martin and Jordan Davis, both of whom had committed no crimes or
infractions of any sort, were deprived of their constitutional right to life by
self-deputized racists who proclaimed themselves judge, juror, and executioner
and gunned them down.
That same year, Rekia Boyd was murdered under a hail of bullets by an
off-duty police officer who reproached Boyd and her friends for talking too
loudly, depriving her of her right to free speech, freedom of assembly, and
life.
In August 2014, Michael Brown’s right to a fair and public trial was violated
by the police officer who shot him and callously left his lifeless body to
bleed out in the street.
Walter Scott’s life and right to due process were taken in
April 2015 at the hands of a law enforcement officer, who then had the audacity
to plant his weapon next to Scott’s motionless body on the ground — all over a
mere traffic violation.
On July 5, 2016, Alton Sterling, a father of five who was selling CDs to
provide for his children, was murdered by law enforcement officers who violated
his Fourth Amendment right to prevent unwarranted search and seizure simply
because he fit a certain profile.
Less than 48 hours later, Philando Castile was pulled over for a broken tail light.
Castile’s non-threatening disclosure that he was legally carrying a concealed
weapon prompted a police officer to murder him in front of his partner and her
four-year-old daughter, violating his Second Amendment right to bear arms.
In 2016, one would hope that the “inalienable rights” of all
Americans are respected. Yet Taney’s words that African Americans “have no
rights which the white man was bound to respect” still ring loud and clear.
The fight for full African American citizenship continues.
Ebony
Slaughter-Johnson is a Next Leader at the Institute for Policy Studies. She
researches history and the criminalization of poverty. Distributed
by OtherWords.org.