By Phil Mattera in the
Dirt Diggers Digest
For more cartoons by Mike Luckovich, CLICK HERE |
John
Stumpf has earned himself a place in the corporate hall of shame for putting
the blame on underlings for carrying out a fraud that must have been sanctioned
by top officials at the bank, which has a reputation for pushing new products
on customers. He may have been inspired by Volkswagen, whose senior people have
been claiming that they knew nothing about systematic cheating on auto
emissions tests.
After
the announcement that
Wells would pay $185 million to settle the case, Stumpf did a self-protective interview with
the Wall Street Journal in which he insisted that the misconduct
was in no way encouraged by management and was inconsistent with the bank’s
internal culture. Few seem to be buying that argument, and Wells is facing
various federal investigations.
The
notion that Wells had been a paragon of virtue is preposterous. The dishonesty
begins with its name, which evokes the legendary stagecoach line. The company
is actually the descendant of Norwest, a bank holding company based in
Minneapolis which changed its name after acquiring the old Wells Fargo in 1998.
Four years later, the combined company had to pay a penalty of $150,000 to settle SEC charges of improperly switching customers among mutual funds. In 2005 the securities industry regulator NASD (now FINRA) fined Wells $3 million for improper sales of mutual funds.
When
Wells acquired Wachovia Bank amid the financial meltdown of 2008 it acquired a
bunch of legal problems, including a municipal securities bid rigging case that
required a $148 million settlement.
Recent
years have seen a long list of additional scandals and settlements. In 2009
Wells had to agree to
buy back $1.4 billion in auction-rate securities to settle allegations by the
California attorney general of misleading investors. In 2011 it agreed to
pay $125 million to settle a lawsuit in which a group of pension funds accused
it of misrepresenting the quality of pools of mortgage-related securities.
That
same year, the Federal Reserve announced an
$85 million civil penalty against Wells Fargo for steering customers with good
qualifications into costly subprime mortgage loans during the housing boom.
In
2012 Wells Fargo was one of five large mortgage servicers that consented to
a $25 billion settlement with the federal government and state attorneys
general to resolve allegations of loan servicing and foreclosure abuses.
Later
that year, the Justice Department announced that
Wells Fargo would pay $175 million to settle charges that it engaged in a
pattern of discrimination against African-American and Hispanic borrowers in
its mortgage lending during the period from 2004 to 2009.
Also in 2012, Wells agreed to
pay $6.5 million to settle SEC charges that it failed to fully research the
risks associated with mortgage-backed securities before selling them to
customers such as municipalities and non-profit organizations.
In
yet another 2012 case, the U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York
filed suit against Wells, charging the bank with engaging in a “longstanding
practice of reckless underwriting and fraudulent loan certification” for
thousands of loans insured by the Federal Housing Administration that
ultimately defaulted. (In February 2016 Wells Fargosaid it
would settle the case for $1.2 billion.)
In
2013 Wells was one of ten major lenders that agreed to
pay a total of $8.5 billion to resolve claims of foreclosure abuses; it settled a
lawsuit alleging that it neglected the maintenance and marketing of foreclosed
homes in black and Latino areas by agreeing to spend at least $42 million to
promote home ownership and neighborhood stabilization; and it agreed to
pay $869 million to Freddie Mac to repurchase home loans the bank had sold to
the mortgage agency that did not conform to the latter’s guidelines.
Jumping
to 2016: the Justice Department announced that
Wells would pay $1.2 billion to resolve allegations that the bank certified to
the Department of Housing and Urban Development that certain residential home
mortgage loans were eligible for Federal Housing Administration insurance when
they were not, resulting in the government having to pay FHA insurance claims
when some of those loans defaulted.
And
a few weeks before the CFPB revealed its sham accounts penalty against Wells,
the agency fined the
bank $3.6 million plus $410,000 in restitution to customers to resolve
allegations that it engaged in illegal student loan servicing practices.
Contrary
to Stumpf, the sham accounts were much in line with the culture of Wells, which
has been corrupt for years. As long as the bank’s top management denies the
reality, it seems unlikely anything will change.
Note:
This post draws from my newly updated Corporate Rap Sheet on
Wells Fargo.