Some
important considerations behind the free trade debate
By
Robert Reich
To watch this video on YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TFBaetuDHyA
Free
trade is figuring prominently in the upcoming presidential election. Donald
Trump is against it. Hillary Clinton has expressed qualms.
Economists
still think free trade benefits most Americans, but according to polls, only
35% of voters agree.
Why
this discrepancy?
Because
economists support any policy that improves efficiency and they typically
define a policy as efficient if the people who benefit from it could compensate
those who lose from it and still come out ahead.
But
this way of looking at things leaves out 3 big realities.
1. Inequality keeps growing. In a society of widening inequality, the winners are often wealthier than the losers, so even if they fully compensate the losers, as the winners gain more ground, the losers may feel even worse off.
2. Safety nets keep unraveling. As a practical matter, the winners
don’t compensate the losers. Most of the losers from trade, the millions whose
good jobs have been lost, don’t even have access to unemployment insurance.
Trade adjustment assistance is a joke. America invests less in jobs training as
a percent of our economy than almost any other advanced nation.
3. Median pay keeps dropping.
Those whose paychecks have been declining because of trade don’t make up for
those declines by having access to cheaper goods and services from abroad. Yes,
those cheaper goods help but adjusted for inflation, the median hourly pay of
production workers is still lower today than it was in 1974.
So
if we want the public to continue to support free trade, we’ve got to ensure
that everyone benefits from it.
This
means we need a genuine reemployment system – including not only
unemployment insurance, but also income insurance.
So if you lose your job and have to take one that pays less, you get a portion of the difference for up to a year.
So if you lose your job and have to take one that pays less, you get a portion of the difference for up to a year.
More
basically, we’ve got to ensure that the gains from trade are more widely
shared.
ROBERT B. REICH is Chancellor's Professor of Public Policy at
the University of California at Berkeley and Senior Fellow at the Blum Center
for Developing Economies. He served as Secretary of Labor in the Clinton
administration, for which Time Magazine named him one of the ten most effective
cabinet secretaries of the twentieth century. He has written fourteen books,
including the best sellers "Aftershock", "The Work of
Nations," and"Beyond Outrage," and, his most recent,
"Saving Capitalism." He is also a founding editor of the American
Prospect magazine, chairman of Common Cause, a member of the American Academy
of Arts and Sciences, and co-creator of the award-winning documentary,
INEQUALITY FOR ALL.