Berkeley
Researchers Highlight Severe, Present Day Costs of Climate Change
Scientist-authors such as Jared Diamond have
shed great light on the role climate change always has, and continues to play,
in determining the success or downfall of all species of life – humans
included.
The problem is that we are causing
climate change on a global scale, and more rapidly than has been the case since
the end of the last Ice Age.
The high and increasing costs are evident today,
according to a new research paper.
Agricultural
and resource economics Ph.D. candidate Tamma Carleton and chancellor’s
associate professor of public policy Solomon Haiang reviewed more than 100
scientific studies while working at the UC Berkeley Goldman School of School of
Public Policy’s Global Policy Lab.
Their
evaluation determined that the socioeconomic impacts of climate change are
often just as severe as they are projected to be in decades to come.
The costs of climate
change today
The
amount of data and research undertaken regarding climate change has exploded
amidst advances in digital technologies and their application in the
biological, physical and social sciences. That enabled Carleton and Hsiang to
carry out their research, “Social and economic impacts of climate,” published online in Science
Magazine.
“So
much attention is focused on the future effects of climate change that
hardships imposed by the climate today, which are often just as large, are
ignored,” said Hsiang in a UC Berkeley research news
report.
Carleton
and Hsiang studied the impacts climate change is having on economies,
agriculture, trade, energy, conflict, migration and other fields.
Among
the results, they found that high temperatures are driving up rates of civil
conflict in sub-Saharan Africa by 29 percent.
The
rapidly warming climate is also slowing down global economic growth by 0.25
percentage points per year, about $19 billion dollars as of the World Bank’s
2013 estimate of nominal Global World Product (GWP) of $75.59 trillion.
Added Carleton: “The failure to adapt could represent
intelligent decision-making, if the costs of implementing changes are very
high, or they could simply indicate persistently poor judgment.
Figuring out which is the case is a trillion-dollar question.”