First-of-a-kind
study reveals top 10 consumer product chemicals in dust with known or suspected
health impacts
George
Washington University Milken Institute School of Public Health
Household
dust exposes people to a wide range of toxic chemicals from everyday products,
according to a study led by researchers at Milken Institute School of Public
Health (Milken Institute SPH) at the George Washington University.
The
multi-institutional team conducted a first-of-a-kind meta-analysis, compiling
data from dust samples collected throughout the United States to identify the
top ten toxic chemicals commonly found in dust.
They found that DEHP, a chemical belonging to a hazardous class called phthalates, was number one on that list.
In addition, the researchers found that phthalates overall were found at the highest levels in dust followed by phenols and flame retardant chemicals.
They found that DEHP, a chemical belonging to a hazardous class called phthalates, was number one on that list.
In addition, the researchers found that phthalates overall were found at the highest levels in dust followed by phenols and flame retardant chemicals.
"Our study is the first comprehensive analysis of consumer product chemicals found in household dust," says lead author Ami Zota, ScD, MS, assistant professor of environmental and occupational health at Milken Institute SPH. "The findings suggest that people, and especially children, are exposed on a daily basis to multiple chemicals in dust that are linked to serious health problems."
Chemicals
from consumer products are released into the air and get into dust, which can
settle on household items or on the floor.
People can inhale or ingest small
particles of dust or even absorb them through the skin. Infants and young
children are particularly at risk for exposure to the chemicals found in dust
because they crawl, play on dusty floors, and put their hands in their mouths,
the authors say.
Zota
and colleagues pooled data from 26 peer-reviewed papers and one unpublished
dataset that analyzed dust samples taken from homes in 14 states.
They found 45
potentially toxic chemicals that are used in many consumer and household
products such as vinyl flooring, personal care and cleaning products, building
materials and home furnishings. The meta-analysis combines information from
smaller dust studies and thus offers solid conclusions with greater statistical
power, the authors say.
The team found that:
Ten
harmful chemicals are found in ninety percent of the dust samples across
multiple studies, including a known cancer-causing agent called TDCIPP. This
flame retardant is frequently found in furniture, baby products and other
household items.
Indoor
dust consistently contains four classes of harmful chemicals in high amounts.
Phthalates, substances that are used to make cosmetics, toys, vinyl flooring,
and other products, were found in the highest concentration with a mean of
7,682 nanograms per gram of dust-an amount that was several orders of magnitude
above the others. Phenols, chemicals used in cleaning products and other
household items, were the number two highest chemical class followed by flame
retardants and highly fluorinated chemicals used to make non-stick cookware.
Chemicals
from dust are likely to get into young children's bodies. A flame retardant
added to couches, baby products, electronics and other products, TCEP, had the
highest estimated intake followed by four phthalates--DEP, DEHP, BBzP and DnBP.
The intake numbers in this study probably underestimate the true exposure to
such chemicals, which are also found in products on the drug store shelf and
even in fast food the authors say.
Phthalates
such as DEP, DEHP, DNBP, and DIBP, are not only found at the highest
concentrations in dust but are associated with many serious health hazards.
Phthalates are thought to interfere with hormones in the body and are linked to
a wide range of health issues including declines in IQ and respiratory problems
in children.
Highly
fluorinated chemicals such as PFOA and PFOS are also high on the potential harm
scale. These types of chemicals, which are found in cell phones, pizza boxes,
and many non-stick, waterproof and stain-resistant products have been linked to
numerous health problems of the immune, digestive, developmental and endocrine
systems.
Small
amounts can add up. Many of the chemicals in dust are linked to the same health
hazards, such as cancer or developmental and reproductive toxicity, and may be
acting together. Exposure to even small amounts of chemicals in combination can
lead to an amplified health risk, especially for developing infants or young
children, the authors say.
"The
number and levels of toxic and untested chemicals that are likely in every one
of our living rooms was shocking to me," said co-author Veena Singla, PhD,
staff scientist at the Natural Resources Defense Council. "Harmful
chemicals used in everyday products and building materials result in widespread
contamination of our homes--these dangerous chemicals should be replaced with
safer alternatives," Singla adds.
In
the meantime, consumers who want to reduce their exposure to chemicals in
household dust and the environment around them can take a few simple steps such
as keeping dust levels low by using a strong vacuum with a HEPA filter; washing
hands frequently; and avoiding personal care and household products that
contain potentially dangerous chemicals.
"Consumers
have the power to make healthier choices and protect themselves from harmful
chemicals in everyday products," says Robin Dodson, an environmental
exposure scientist at Silent Spring Institute. "These things can make a
real difference not only in their health but also in shifting the market toward
safer products."
###
The meta-analysis,
"Consumer product chemicals in indoor dust: a quantitative meta-analysis
of U.S. studies," will be published September 14 in the journal Environmental Science & Technology.
In addition to Zota, Dodson, and Singla the team included Susanna Mitro and
Angelo Elmi at Milken Institute SPH as well as scientists from the Harvard T.H.
Chan School of Public Health and the University of California, San Francisco.
Funding for the study was provided by the Natural Resources Defense Council,
the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences and the U.S. Department
of Housing and Urban Development.
About Milken
Institute School of Public Health at the George Washington University
Established in July 1997 as the School of Public Health and Health Services, Milken
Institute School of Public Health is the only school of public health in the
nation's capital. Today, more than 1,900 students from 54 U.S. states and
territories and more than 50 countries pursue undergraduate, graduate and
doctoral-level degrees in public health. The school also offers an online
Master of Public Health, MPH@GW, and an online Executive Master of Health
Administration, MHA@GW, which allow students to pursue their degree from
anywhere in the world.
About the
Natural Resources Defense Council
The Natural
Resources Defense Council (NRDC) is an international nonprofit environmental
organization with more than 2 million members and online activists. Since 1970,
our lawyers, scientists, and other environmental specialists have worked to
protect the world's natural resources, public health, and the environment. NRDC
has offices in New York City, Washington, D.C., Los Angeles, San Francisco,
Chicago, Bozeman, MT, and Beijing. Visit us at http://www.nrdc.org and follow us on Twitter @NRDC.
About Silent
Spring Institute
Silent Spring
Institute, based in Newton, Mass., is a leading scientific research
organization dedicated to understanding the links between chemicals in our
everyday environments and human health, with a focus on cancer prevention.
Founded in 1994, the institute is developing innovative technologies to
accelerate the development of safer chemicals, while translating its science
into policies that protect health. For more information, visit http://www.silentspring.org.