When bridges collapse: Stanford researchers
study whether we’re underestimating the risk
BY
ROB JORDAN
RIDOT photo |
The United States is
considering a $1 trillion budget proposal to update infrastructure, including
its crumbling bridges.
An obstacle to spending the money wisely is
that the current means of assessing bridges may underestimate their
vulnerability, according to a new study published in the Journal
of Infrastructure Systems.
Case in point is a bridge along California’s iconic Big Sur coast, which collapsed in March, isolating communities and costing local businesses millions of dollars.
Although
California’s recent unprecedented rains were likely to damage
infrastructure, standard risk assessments made it hard to identify which
bridges were most vulnerable.
“This winter in
California has highlighted the vulnerabilities of our nation’s infrastructure,”
said Noah Diffenbaugh, a professor of Earth
system science at Stanford and the Kimmelman Family Senior Fellow at the
Stanford Woods Institute for the Environment.
“Updating our infrastructure will
require both making up for deferred maintenance, and preparing for the
increasing risk of extreme events that comes along with global warming.”
More frequent flooding
Big Sur’s damaged
Pfeiffer Canyon Bridge – out until at least September – is a harbinger of
things to come. As climate and land-use change drive more frequent and intense
flooding, collapses among the nation’s more than 500,000 water-spanning bridges
will likely increase, the authors state.
Complicated natural
factors make accurate damage estimates hard to come by, but regional and
national bridge studies have predicted up to $250 billion in direct climate
impacts costs – numbers that serve only as indicators of the true magnitude of
costs related to climate change impacts on bridges, including lost business and
ability to commute to work.
U.S. risk assessments
generally assume that bridges may collapse when a 100-year flood – a
streamflow with 1 percent probability of being exceeded in any given year, or
63 percent over the course of a century – occurs.
This assumption
underestimates risk, the paper’s authors find, because it fails to capture the
full range of stream flow conditions that can cause bridge collapse.
A new model
In their analysis, the
researchers considered the full variability of floods that could cause
collapse, as opposed to the 100-year approach taken previously.
As a
result, their findings identified a greater sensitivity to changes in
the underlying frequency of flooding. This result appears to support
the idea that analyses considering a range of flood scenarios, as opposed to a
single 100-year threshold, could be more robust and accurate.
Indeed, of the 35
bridges analyzed, 23 were estimated to have collapsed during a water flow of
lesser intensity than a 100-year flood level. The authors note that a primary
reason for these lower flow collapses is the fact that most of those collapsed
bridges were built before modern design standards.
Because most U.S. bridges,
along with most U.S. infrastructure, pre-date the modern design standards, the
results highlight a more general risk that extreme climate events pose to U.S.
infrastructure.
The American Society for
Civil Engineering gives U.S. bridges a C+, estimating that $123 billion is
needed to clear the maintenance backlog. An additional $140-$250 billion over
the 21st century may be required to address the increasing risks posed by
climate change, according to past research.
“To balance funding
between the backlog and climate adaptation, bridge managers will need robust
data on collapse risk,” said lead author Madeleine M. Flint, an assistant
professor of civil & environmental engineering at Virginia Polytechnic
Institute and State University. “Our study is a step in that direction.”
Noah Diffenbaugh is a
professor at Stanford’s School of Earth, Energy & Environmental
Sciences. Coauthors of “Historical Analysis of Hydraulic Bridge Collapses
in the Continental United States” also include Sarah L. Billington, professor
of civil and environmental engineering; and Oliver Fringer and David Freyberg,
both associate professors of civil and environmental engineering at Stanford.
The Stanford Woods
Institute for the Environment supported this research through the Environmental Venture Projects seed
grant program.