By Robert Reich
Mitch McConnell is delaying a vote on the Senate Republican version of Trumpcare because he doesn’t yet have a majority.
To watch this on YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WtGhaJjW-4Y
Mitch McConnell is delaying a vote on the Senate Republican version of Trumpcare because he doesn’t yet have a majority.
Some Senate
Republicans think the bill doesn’t go get rid of enough of the Affordable Care
Act.
Others worry that it goes too far – especially in light of the Congressional Budget Office’s finding that it would eliminate coverage for 22 million Americans.
Others worry that it goes too far – especially in light of the Congressional Budget Office’s finding that it would eliminate coverage for 22 million Americans.
What should be the
Democrats’ response? Over the next weeks or months, Democrats must continue to
defend the Affordable Care Act. It’s not perfect, but it’s a major step in the
right direction. Over 20 million Americans have gained coverage because
of it.
But Democrats also
need to go further and offer Americans a positive vision of where the nation
should be headed over the long term. That’s toward Medicare for all.
Some background: American spending on healthcare per person is more than twice the average in the world’s thirty-five advanced economies. Yet Americans are sicker, our lives are shorter, and we have more chronic illnesses than in any other advanced nation.
That’s because medical
care is so expensive for the typical American that many put off seeing a doctor
until their health has seriously deteriorated.
Why is healthcare so
much cheaper in other nations? Partly because their governments negotiate lower
rates with health providers. In France, the average cost of a magnetic
resonance imagining exam is $363. In the United States, it’s $1,121. There, an
appendectomy costs $4,463. Here, $13,851.
They can get lower
rates because they cover everyone – which gives them lots of bargaining power.
Other nations also
don’t have to pay the costs of private insurers shelling out billions of
dollars a year on advertising and marketing – much of it intended to attract
healthier and younger people and avoid the sicker and older.
Nor do other nations
have to pay boatloads of money to the shareholders and executives of big
for-profit insurance companies.
Finally, they don’t
have to bear the high administrative costs of private insurers – requiring
endless paperwork to keep track of every procedure by every provider.
According to the
Kaiser Family Foundation, Medicare’s administrative costs are only about 2
percent of its operating expenses. That’s less than one-sixth the
administrative costs of America’s private insurers
To make matters even
worse for Americans, the nation’s private health insurers are merging like mad
in order to suck in even more money from consumers and taxpayers by reducing
competition.
At the same time,
their focus on attracting healthy people and avoiding sick people is creating a
vicious cycle. Insurers that take in sicker and costlier patients lose money,
which forces them to raise premiums, co-payments, and deductibles. This, in turn,
makes it harder for people most in need of health insurance to afford it.
This phenomenon has
even plagued health exchanges under the Affordable Care Act.
Medicare for all would
avoid all these problems, and get lower prices and better care.
It would be financed
the same way Medicare and Social Security are financed, through the payroll
tax. Wealthy Americans would pay a higher payroll tax rate and contribute more
than lower-income people. But everyone would win because total healthcare costs
would be far lower, and outcomes far better.
If Republicans succeed
in gutting the Affordable Care Act or subverting it, the American public will
be presented with a particularly stark choice: Expensive health care for the
few, or affordable health care for the many.
This political reality
is already playing out in Congress, as many Democrats move toward Medicare for
All. Most House Democrats are co-sponsoring a Medicare for All bill there.
Senator Bernie Sanders is preparing to introduce it in the Senate. New York and
California are moving toward statewide versions.
A Gallup poll conducted in May found that a majority of
Americans would support such a system. Another poll by the Pew Research Center
shows that such support is growing, with 60 percent of Americans now saying
government should be responsible for ensuring health care coverage for all
Americans – up from 51 percent last year.
Democrats would be
wise to seize the moment. They shouldn’t merely defend the Affordable Care Act.
They should also go on the offensive – with Medicare for all.
ROBERT B. REICH is Chancellor's Professor of
Public Policy at the University of California at Berkeley and Senior Fellow at
the Blum Center for Developing Economies. He served as Secretary of Labor in
the Clinton administration, for which Time Magazine named him one of the ten
most effective cabinet secretaries of the twentieth century. He has written
fourteen books, including the best sellers "Aftershock", "The
Work of Nations," and"Beyond Outrage," and, his most recent,
"Saving Capitalism." He is also a founding editor of the American
Prospect magazine, chairman of Common Cause, a member of the American Academy
of Arts and Sciences, and co-creator of the award-winning documentary,
INEQUALITY FOR ALL.