Trump’s voter fraud commission illegally uses private
e-mail for official business.
President
Donald Trump’s voter fraud commission came under fire earlier this month when a
lawsuit and media reports revealed that the commissioners were using private
emails to conduct public business.
Commission co-chair Kris Kobach confirmed this week that most of them continue to do so.
Commission co-chair Kris Kobach confirmed this week that most of them continue to do so.
Experts
say the commission’s email practices do not appear to comport with federal law.
“The statute here is clear,” said Jason Baron, a lawyer at Drinker Biddle and
former director of litigation at the National Archives and Records
Administration.
Essentially,
Baron said, the commissioners have three options: 1. They can use a government email
address; 2. They can use a private email address but copy every message to a
government account; or 3. They can use a private email address and forward each
message to a government account within 20 days.
According to Baron, those are the requirements of the Presidential Records Act (PRA) of 1978, which the commission must comply with under its charter.
According to Baron, those are the requirements of the Presidential Records Act (PRA) of 1978, which the commission must comply with under its charter.
“All written communications between or among its members involving commission business are permanent records destined to be preserved at the National Archives,” said Baron. “Without specific guidance, commission members may not realize that their email communications about commission business constitute White House records.”
ProPublica
reviewed dozens of emails to and from members of the commission as well as
written directives on records retention. The commissioners appear to have been
given no instructions to use government email or copy or forward messages
to a government account.
Commissioner
Matthew Dunlap, the secretary of state for Maine, confirmed that he’d received
no such directives. “That’s news to me,” he said, when read the PRA provision
governing emails. “I think it would be a little cleaner if I had a us.gov email
account.”
Dunlap’s
account is disputed by Andrew Kossack, the executive director of the
commission. Kossack said attorneys from the Government Services Administration
provided training on the PRA before the commission’s first meeting on July 19.
Kossack provided a copy of the PowerPoint presentation.
However, the word “email” appears in only a single slide — with no mention of anything relating to the use of government email.
However, the word “email” appears in only a single slide — with no mention of anything relating to the use of government email.
Notably,
the commission did not receive any training in records retention until the July
19 meeting, even though the commission was formed in May and had been actively
engaged in commission business.
Indeed,
the commission had kicked into high gear on June 28, when it sent a letter to
all 50 secretaries of state requesting publicly available voter rolls. The
response was swift and negative, and commissioners began receiving a wave of
messages from election officials and the public.
Despite
this, the commissioners were offered no instructions then on how to preserve
communications. Baron said such messages would presumptively be considered
presidential records, and “the obligation to preserve such records would have
arisen on day one.”
In
a statement, Kossack denied there is an obligation to provide commissioners
with government email addresses. He maintained that the commission is required
only to “preserve emails and other records related to work on commission
matters, regardless of the forum on which the records are created or sent,
which the commission and its members are doing.”
After
the commission’s most recent meeting, on Tuesday, Kobach confirmed that he
plans to continue to use his personal gmail account to conduct commission business.
Using his Kansas secretary of state email address, he said, would be a “waste
of state resources” as he’s acting as a private citizen on the commission and
not in his role as secretary of state.
Dunlap
has interpreted the requirements differently. He’s trying to ensure his state
email account is used so that emails can be made available to constituents
under Maine state law. Even this is a struggle, he said, asserting that
commissioners continue to email him at his personal account despite multiple requests
that they send email to his government account.
“I
really don’t understand why they keep using my personal Gmail account instead
of my official state email. But I’m saving everything!” Dunlap wrote to himself
on August 7, when he forwarded a communication from the commission to his
government address. He has, it appears, continued to immediately forward all
emails sent to his personal address by the commission to his state address.
At
ProPublica’s request, Dunlap shared every email he has received or sent
relating to the commission. The majority went to personal email accounts.
At
their recent meeting in New Hampshire, Kossack provided commissioners printed
instructions on how to retain their own emails related to a lawsuit filed
against the commission by the Lawyers Committee for Civil Rights Under Law.
Dunlap
said these instructions are the only written set of instructions on records
retention he recalls receiving. (The instructions leave records retention
entirely to the discretion of each member of the commission, which Dunlap said
concerns him.)
Past
commissions with similar missions were not allowed such wide discretion. The
Presidential Commission on Election Administration, formed by the Obama
administration in March 2013, provided ethics and records retention training
days after commissioners were nominated.
Each commissioner was provided with a federal email address that automatically archived all messages. PCEA documents show extensive, specific instructions on records retention and compliance with FACA.
Each commissioner was provided with a federal email address that automatically archived all messages. PCEA documents show extensive, specific instructions on records retention and compliance with FACA.
Richard
Painter, who served as the George W. Bush administration’s chief ethics lawyer
from 2005 to 2007, expressed shock that the current commission is being allowed
to rely on personal email accounts (which are to be forwarded to Kossack at
their discretion).
“This is just sloppy,” he said, adding that waiting more than two months to offer ethics training was just another sign that the Trump administration “doesn’t take ethics training seriously.”
“This is just sloppy,” he said, adding that waiting more than two months to offer ethics training was just another sign that the Trump administration “doesn’t take ethics training seriously.”
One
footnote: Among the emails provided by Dunlap was a message from Carter Page, a former policy adviser to
the Trump campaign who has reportedly attracted the attention of investigators
probing the Russia imbroglio.
Page sent an email on July 5 to three accounts associated with Kobach and cc’d Dunlap, New Hampshire Secretary of State Bill Gardner and Indiana Secretary of State Connie Lawson.
In it, he implored the commission to investigate “the Obama administration’s misuse of federal resources of the Intelligence Community in their unjustified attacks on myself and other volunteers who peacefully supported [Trump’s] campaign as private citizens.”
Page sent an email on July 5 to three accounts associated with Kobach and cc’d Dunlap, New Hampshire Secretary of State Bill Gardner and Indiana Secretary of State Connie Lawson.
In it, he implored the commission to investigate “the Obama administration’s misuse of federal resources of the Intelligence Community in their unjustified attacks on myself and other volunteers who peacefully supported [Trump’s] campaign as private citizens.”
“The
work of your commission offers an essential opportunity to take further steps
toward helping to further restore the integrity of the American democracy
following their abuses of last year,” he wrote.
There
is no evidence this email was forwarded to a federal email account. Page,
Kossack and Kobach did not respond to requests for comment about the email.