Senator Whitehouse: "Muzzling our leading
scientists benefits no one"
In what critics
are calling "a blatant example of the scientific
censorship" being imposed on climate researchers by the Trump White House,
the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) late Sunday abruptly canceled the
presentations of three government scientists who were set to discuss recent
climate change findings at a conference in Rhode Island.
They don't believe in
climate change, so I think what they're trying to do is stifle discussions of
the impacts of climate change," John King, professor of oceanography at
the University of Rhode Island, said of EPA administrator Scott Pruitt and other
top White House officials.
Robinson Fulweiler, a
Boston University ecosystems ecologist, echoed King's critique in an interview with the Washington
Post, calling the EPA's move an "abuse of power."
"The silencing of government scientists is a scary step toward silencing anyone who disagrees," Fulweiler concluded. "The choice by our government leaders to ignore the abundant and overwhelming data regarding climate change does not stop it from being true or prevent the negative consequences that are already occurring and those that are on the horizon."
The Rhode Island
conference was planned by the Narragansett
Bay Estuary Program, which is funded by the EPA. Pruitt's 2018 budget would
eliminate the program entirely.
The three scientists
who have been barred from speaking at the event contributed substantially to
a new report released to coincide with the
conference, and all three were planning to discuss the present and future
impacts of human-caused climate change, Lisa Friedman of the New York
Times reports.
Specifically, Friedman
notes, the event was "designed to draw attention to the health of
Narragansett Bay, the largest estuary in New England and a key to the region's
tourism and fishing industries."
Friedman went on to
highlight the topics of the researchers' scrapped presentations:
Autumn Oczkowski, a
research ecologist at the EPA's National Health and Environmental Effects
Research Laboratory Atlantic Ecology Division in Rhode Island, was scheduled to
give the keynote address. Colleagues familiar with her speech said she intended
to address climate change and other factors affecting the health of the
estuary.
Rose Martin, a
postdoctoral fellow at the same EPA laboratory and Emily Shumchenia, an EPA
consultant, were scheduled to speak on an afternoon panel entitled "The
Present and Future Biological Implications of Climate Change."
Though the EPA's
unexplained last-minute cancellation raised the ire of environmentalists,
lawmakers, and climate researchers, it can hardly be viewed as surprising,
given the Trump administration's track record and stated aims.
As EcoWatch reported late last week, the EPA scrubbed
more than a dozen mentions of climate change from its website recently as part
of "the Trump administration's ongoing efforts to pretend that climate
change doesn't exist."
Trump's EPA has
also issued a four-year "strategy"
document that doesn't include the word "climate," threatened to
"purge" scientists who refuse to toe the
fossil fuel industry line, and overwhelmingly privileged the views of
oil and gas industry representatives over those of environmental groups.
Sen. Sheldon
Whitehouse (D-R.I.), who is scheduled to speak at Monday's conference, slammed the EPA's decision as harmful to
both his home state and the nation.
"Muzzling our
leading scientists benefits no one," Whitehouse concluded.