Worker safety in the hands of this guy
By Phil Mattera for the Dirt Diggers Digest
Bizarro Superman actually the source of Trump's political philosophy |
Mugno is not a
worker safety advocate, occupational health scientist or a union official.
Instead, he is a corporate safety executive at the shipping giant FedEx.
Data in Violation
Tracker shows since 2000 FedEx has racked up $335,853 in OSHA
penalties (counting only those fines of $5,000 or more designated as serious,
willful or repeated). This total is the 208th largest among the 1,777 parent
companies in Violation Tracker with OSHA fines.
While FedEx may not be at the very
top of the OSHA penalty list, it does have some significant safety blemishes on
its record.
In 2014, for example, OSHA proposed a fine of $44,000 against the
company for failing to properly guard a conveyor belt at its facility in
Wilmington, Massachusetts. In its press release announcing the proposed penalty
(which FedEx managed to get deleted), the agency noted that the company had
previously been cited for the same issue at two other facilities.
Another sign of Mugno’s orientation
is the warm reception his nomination has received from business groups such as
the Chamberand the American Trucking Association.
At the same time, public interest
groups have expressed concern. Public Citizen came out in opposition to the
nomination, citing Mugno’s 2006 remarks and arguing that his “stance on laws
and regulations do not mesh with leading an agency tasked with writing rules to
ensure safe and healthy working conditions.”
The Center for Progressive
Reform posted a long list of questions that
need to be put to Mugno.
The Center, by the way, has just
introduced a Crimes Against Workers Database that
compiles information on state-level criminal actions against companies and
their executives implicated in serious workplace accidents. (I’m pleased to
report that the database includes links to Violation Tracker data, and I plan
to reciprocate.)
It was to be expected that Trump,
who repeatedly bashed the EPA during the presidential campaign, would have
named a climate change denier and regulation hater like Scott Pruitt to head
that agency. Yet Trump did not carry on a similar tirade against OSHA, perhaps
realizing that many of his blue-collar supporters were all too aware of
workplace hazards that needed the agency’s oversight.
If Trump were any kind of real
populist, he could have named a true worker safety advocate to OSHA without
breaking any campaign promises. Instead, he brought in a business apologist who
will pursue the Chamber agenda and raise the risk level for millions of
American workers. The Trump corporate takeover marches on.