When
Vegetables Are Closer in Price to Chips, People Eat Healthier, Drexel Study
Finds
When healthier food, like vegetables
and dairy products, is pricier compared to unhealthy items, like salty snacks
and sugary sweets, Americans are significantly less likely to have a high-quality
diet, a new Drexel University study found.
The research, led by David Kern, PhD, an
adjunct faculty member at Drexel’s Dornsife School of Public Health, and Amy Auchincloss,
PhD, an associate professor in the school, sought to find
out the real effect that price difference has on the quality of diets in the
United States.
“We found that, on average,
healthier perishable foods were nearly twice as expensive as unhealthy packaged
foods: 60 cents vs. 31 cents per serving, respectively,” said Kern, lead author
of the study in
the International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health.
“As the gap between neighborhood prices of healthier and unhealthier foods got wider, study participants had lower odds of having a healthier diet.”
“As the gap between neighborhood prices of healthier and unhealthier foods got wider, study participants had lower odds of having a healthier diet.”
For example, the study found that for every 14 percent increase in the healthy-to-unhealthy price ratio (the standard deviation in this study), the odds of having a healthy diet dropped by 24 percent. This was even after controlling for personal characteristics, like age, sex, income, education and other factors.
“We are consuming way too many
sugary foods like cookies, candies and pastries, and sugary drinks, like soda
and fruit drinks,” Auchincloss said.
“Nearly 40 percent of U.S. adults are obese and less than 20 percent attain recommendations for fruits and vegetables. Cheap prices of unhealthy foods relative to healthier foods may be contributing to obesity and low-quality diet.”
“Nearly 40 percent of U.S. adults are obese and less than 20 percent attain recommendations for fruits and vegetables. Cheap prices of unhealthy foods relative to healthier foods may be contributing to obesity and low-quality diet.”
To delve into price impacts, Kern
and Auchincloss used cross-sectional data from 2,765 participants in the
Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis (MESA). Participants were recruited from
six urban areas in the U.S.: New York, Chicago, St. Paul, Los Angeles,
Baltimore and Winston-Salem in North Carolina.
Each participant’s diet data was linked to food prices at supermarkets in their neighborhood.
Each participant’s diet data was linked to food prices at supermarkets in their neighborhood.
Grocery prices were broken down into
categories of “healthier” and “unhealthy.”
Healthier foods included:
Healthier foods included:
- Dairy products — milk, yogurt and cottage cheese
- Fruits and vegetables — frozen vegetables and orange juice, since fresh produce prices were not attainable
Meanwhile, among the unhealthy foods
were:
- Soda
- Sweets — chocolate candy and cookies
- Salty snacks — potato chips
The researchers used the Healthy Eating Index–2010 (HEI-2010), developed
by the United States Department of Agriculture, to assess the study
participants’ dietary quality.
“A well-balanced diet of fruits,
veggies, whole grains, low-fat milk and lean protein, with a minimal
consumption of sodium and sugary foods and drinks — like soda and junk food —
would receive an optimal score on the HEI-2010,” Kern said.
The adverse impact of increasing
healthy food prices compared to unhealthy food prices was particularly strong
for people in the middle ranges of income/wealth in the study, and those with
higher education.
“We originally expected to find the
largest impact among individuals in the lowest wealth/income group. However,
given the price gap that we found, healthy food may be too expensive for the
lowest socioeconomic status group even at its most affordable,” Kern said. “So
the impact of the price ratio is weaker for this group.”
A lot of research in public health
has been devoted to changing food environments for the purpose of encouraging
healthier eating. This is one of the few studies that takes a hard look
at prices between foods, compares them, and tries to link them back to their
dietary implications.
Kern and Auchincloss believe more
work needs to be done in this arena. In fact, they recently did work (published
in Preventive Medicine) that found the price ratio of
healthy-to-unhealthy food had a significant association with insulin
resistance.
“Prospective studies that examine
interventions effecting food prices — such as taxes on soda and junk food or
subsidies for fruits and vegetables — would be vital to understand how food
prices influence purchasing decisions and subsequent diet quality,” Kern
concluded.
“Improving diet quality in the U.S., especially for the most vulnerable populations, is a large public health concern and future research could help address this issue.”
“Improving diet quality in the U.S., especially for the most vulnerable populations, is a large public health concern and future research could help address this issue.”
The study, “Neighborhood Prices of Healthier and
Unhealthier Foods and Associations with Diet Quality: Evidence from the
Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis,” was also co-authored
by Mark Stehr, PhD, an associate professor in Drexel's School
of Economics; Ana Diez Roux, MD, PhD, dean; Lucy
Robinson, PhD; and Genevieve Pham-Kanter, PhD; of the Dornsife
School of Public Health; and Latetica Moore, PhD, at the National
Center for Chronic Disease Prevention & Health Promotion, Centers for
Disease Control & Prevention.