It’s
unpopular. It’s expensive. But the donors want it.
By
Sometimes I have to remind myself that people in “real America”
with “real jobs” don’t while away their mortal hours reading about politics.
But God help me, if you’ve suffered through any coverage of the Republican tax plan, you’ve probably heard three things.
But God help me, if you’ve suffered through any coverage of the Republican tax plan, you’ve probably heard three things.
First, it’ll dramatically slash taxes on corporations and
billionaires, raise them for nearly a third of us in the middle class,
and blow a $1.5 trillion hole in the deficit.
Second, it’s unpopular. Less than a third of Americans support
it, Reuters reports. That’s worse than Trump’s own approval rating, which
remains mired in the 30s.
And third, the Republicans who control Congress believe it
simply must pass.
In fact, this third point sets the tenor for the entire debate.
“Republicans are desperate to rack up a legislative win after a series of embarrassing failures,” TIME observes. “If tax reform doesn’t pass, many in the party fear an all-out revolt in 2018.”
“Republicans are desperate to rack up a legislative win after a series of embarrassing failures,” TIME observes. “If tax reform doesn’t pass, many in the party fear an all-out revolt in 2018.”
“All of us realize that if we fail on taxes, that’s the end of
the Republican Party’s governing majority in 2018,” South Carolina Republican
Lindsey Graham told Fox News recently. In fact, “that’s
probably the end of the Republican Party as we know it.”
If the tax giveaway doesn’t pass, adds Utah Republican Mike Lee,
“We might as well pack up our tent and go home.”
The thing is, that doesn’t make any sense. Gallup
polls have shown over and over that most Americans think rich
people and corporations should pay more, not less. Even a majority of Republican voters worry
about what this wealth grab will do to the deficit.
If they were looking for a win, then, Republicans would be
running against their own plan. So what gives?
Well, New Jersey Republican Chris Collins recently offered a clue: “My donors are
basically saying, ‘Get it done or don’t ever call me again.'” Ah!
In other words, it doesn’t have a lick to do with voters — many
of whom in Collins’ high-tax district will likely pay more, since the party
wants to end federal deductions for state and local taxes.
It has everything to do with the affluent donors who bankroll GOP campaigns.
It has everything to do with the affluent donors who bankroll GOP campaigns.
A similar dynamic played out in the health care debate. GOP
leaders trotted out plan after plan that would eliminate coverage for anywhere
from 20 to 24 million Americans — plans that never topped the low 20s in public
support.
But those plans would have reduced taxes on the
wealthy. So they had to pass.
“Senator Charles E. Grassley of Iowa, who has been deeply
involved in health policy for years, told reporters back home that he could
count 10 reasons the new health proposal should not reach the floor,” the New
York Times reported back in September, “but that
Republicans needed to press ahead regardless.”
When those bills met their righteous demise, elite GOP
fundraising took a huge dive. Senate Republicans lost $2 million in
planned contributions alone, The Hill noted this summer.
Fundraising in those months fell some $5 million below where it had been in the
spring.
So there it is, team: Follow the money. It’s no wonder Princeton
researchers found a few years ago that rich people matter
to Congress, but ordinary folks generally don’t. That’s probably why many of us
prefer to tune it out entirely.
It’s also exactly why we do have to pay attention. Especially in
those rare moments when members admit exactly what’s going on.
Peter Certo is the
editorial manager of the Institute for Policy Studies and the editor of
OtherWords.org.