Tipping the Scales Against Workers
Donald Trump built his presidential
campaign on the claim that he would be a champion for working people, yet his
administration finds one way after another to tip the scales in favor of
employers. The latest example involves tips themselves.
In December the Labor Department,
bowing to the wishes of the National Restaurant Association, proposed to
rescind an Obama Administration rule that prohibited employers from pooling
tips.
The rule had been adopted to prevent restaurant owners from claiming a share of the gratuities.
The rule had been adopted to prevent restaurant owners from claiming a share of the gratuities.
While the DOL has claimed that the
change would benefit back-of-house workers who don’t directly receive tips,
groups such as Restaurant Opportunities Centers (ROC) United say that employers
often grab a portion of tips when it is not permitted and that legalizing the
practice will only encourage owners to take more.
It turns out that ROC United’s
position is shared but some at DOL, but those views are being suppressed.
Bloomberg has just reported that political officials
at the department rejected an internal analysis concluding that workers could
lose billions of dollars from tip pooling.
DOL sources told Bloomberg that the officials ordered staffers to change their methodology to reach a different conclusion.
DOL sources told Bloomberg that the officials ordered staffers to change their methodology to reach a different conclusion.
Anyone who takes an honest look at the restaurant industry is bound to conclude that employers will do their utmost to exploit tip pooling. After all, these are companies that already steal from their workers through violations of wage and hour rules concerning off-the-clock work, overtime, misclassification and the like.
Consider the large full-service
chains such as Darden Restaurants (Olive Garden, Capital Grille and other
brands), Brinker International (Chili’s and Maggiano’s), Bloomin’ Brands
(Outback Steakhouse and others) and DineEquity (Applebee’s and IHOP).
As shown in Violation Tracker, each one of these has had to pay fines to the DOL’s Wage and Hour Division; six times in the case of DineEquity.
As shown in Violation Tracker, each one of these has had to pay fines to the DOL’s Wage and Hour Division; six times in the case of DineEquity.
The chains have also been targeted
in private collective action lawsuits brought by groups of workers. In 2007
Darden agreed to pay $11 million to settle a
group of suits alleging that the company improperly classified certain types of
workers as exempt from overtime pay eligibility.
In 2014 Brinker International agreed to pay $56.5 million to settle
a long-running lawsuit alleging that the company had routinely violated
California rules about meal and rest breaks.
In 2016 Bloomin’ Brands agreed to pay $3 million to settle allegations that workers at its Outback outlets were required to show up early to perform unpaid pre-shift prep work. DineEquity has faced similar litigation.
In 2016 Bloomin’ Brands agreed to pay $3 million to settle allegations that workers at its Outback outlets were required to show up early to perform unpaid pre-shift prep work. DineEquity has faced similar litigation.
Why would anyone think that
companies involved in such transgressions would pass up another opportunity to
enrich themselves if DOL gives a green light to tip pooling?