Study first to show
economic benefits of tackling dirty shoreline
By: Misti
Crane, Ohio State
University
Cleaning up beaches
could boost local economies in addition to preserving natural treasures and
animal habitats.
In southern
California’s Orange County alone, the economic benefits of beach cleanup could
range from $13 per resident in a three-month period if debris were reduced by
25 percent to $42 per resident with a 75 percent drop in plastics and other
trash along the oceanfront, according to a new study.
That could mean up to a $46 million boost to the county’s economy in just one summer.
That could mean up to a $46 million boost to the county’s economy in just one summer.
This is the first
study to compare the amount of ocean debris with the behavior of beachgoers and
to calculate an economic benefit to cleaning up those beaches, said Tim
Haab, a professor of
agricultural, environmental and development economics at The Ohio State
University.
To come up with an estimated benefit, Haab and his co-authors embarked on a two-part study, which appears online in the journal Marine Resource Economics. The work was done in collaboration with the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration’s marine debris program.
The researchers
evaluated the amount of ocean debris on 31 California beaches and found that
some were much dirtier than others. Debris includes plastics that wash in from
ships, trash that finds its way to shore from rivers and the litter that beach
visitors leave behind.
The research team also
mailed surveys to 4,000 randomly selected Orange County residents to learn
about which beaches they frequent and what they look for in a good sun-and-surf
spot. They heard back from 36 percent of those households and analyzed their
1,436 completed surveys. Some people visited the beach often, others less
frequently. Information from thousands of beach trips went into the analysis.
Overall, the Californians
ranked absence of marine debris and good water quality as key characteristics
when deciding on a beach to visit – 66 percent of those surveyed called those
factors “very important.” Those qualities ranked above scenic beauty,
convenient parking and sandiness.
The researchers were
able to take information about the participants’ beach-use patterns – and how
far they travel to get to a desirable beach – to calculate a travel cost linked
to skipping nearby dirty beaches in favor of longer jaunts to cleaner
coastline.
They took other influences on beachgoer behavior, such as availability of trash cans and beach congestion, into account when analyzing the data.
They took other influences on beachgoer behavior, such as availability of trash cans and beach congestion, into account when analyzing the data.
“A lot of work has
been done to quantify the physical costs of ocean debris, but until now we
haven’t been able to quantify the economic benefit of cleaning up the beaches
and preventing the problem in the first place,” Haab said.
“We were able to
correlate ocean debris with trip patterns and arrive at potential cost savings
if people went to closer beaches.”
Estimated savings
ranged from $29.5 million ($12.91 per Orange County resident) to $46.5 million
($42.30 per Orange County resident) in a three-month period. The lower-end
estimate was based on a 25 percent reduction in debris; the higher-end estimate
on a 75 percent reduction.
“Given the magnitude
of these benefits, a variety of marine debris abatement activities is likely to
prove cost effective,” the researchers wrote.
“In 2016, outdoor
recreation accounted for $374 billion, or 2 percent, of the gross domestic
product in the United States. This shows that improving environmental quality
can benefit the economy,” Haab said.
He said the savings
could be even greater than outlined in the study. It did not take into account
travelers from outside Orange County, for instance, nor did it consider
benefits beyond those afforded to beach visitors, such as a healthier habitat
for marine life.
The study could serve
to inform policy decisions by showing that there are economic reasons – in
addition to the environmental ones – to look for ways to prevent ocean debris
and clean up the plastics and other litter on beaches.
“We put a dollar value
on beach cleanup efforts. This is important because it helps government
agencies quantify the benefits of efforts to keep marine debris out of our
waterways and off of our beaches,” said study co-author Christopher Leggett of
Bedrock Statistics.
Haab would like to
work on a larger-scale evaluation of the economic impact of ocean debris to
better understand differences in coastal communities around the U.S. and
abroad, he said.
Other researchers who
worked on the study were Nora Scherer of Industrial Economics, Ryan Bailey of
Borrego Solar, Jason Landrum of the Lenfest Ocean Program and The Pew
Charitable Trusts and Adam Domanski of ECONorthwest.
The study was
supported by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration.