Views caucus as providing political
cover for its members.
Climate activists aren’t
the only ones waiting for members of the bipartisan House Climate Solutions
Caucus to propose meaningful climate change legislation. A senator, who has become a prominent climate action advocate, is taking the caucus to task for failing to bring Democrats and Republicans together to craft significant climate legislation.
Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse
(D-RI), speaking at a renewable energy policy forum sponsored by
the American Council on Renewable Energy (ACORE) in Washington, referred to the
House Climate Solutions Caucus as the “do-nothing caucus” for its inability to
propose any form of climate legislation. Whitehouse’s comments mark one of the
few times that a member of Congress has criticized the caucus.
“I do think that it is important on all of us that we not grade the House so-called climate caucus on too much of curve. At some point, they really need to do something,” Whitehouse said in response to a question from a member of the audience about the caucus. “Resolutions are nice, but this is an actual, physical problem in the chemistry and atmospheric science of our planet. And resolutions don’t affect any of that.”
Whitehouse and fellow
Democrat, Sen. Brian Schatz (HI), for example, have been promoting their
American Opportunity Carbon Fee Act as a proposal Republicans should be able to
get behind due to its simplicity and the fact that the revenues would go back
to taxpayers. The proposal would set a $49 per ton fee, increasing annually, on
carbon dioxide emissions, charged at the point of a fossil fuel’s extraction or
importation.
“At some point, we need
to make sure these people don’t get to dine out on being just members of a
do-nothing caucus that has the right nameplate on it,” Whitehouse said
Wednesday. “There’s actually got to be a product.”
The Climate
Solutions Caucus was formed after a volunteer with the advocacy
group Citizens’ Climate Lobby approached Rep.
Ted Deutch (D-FL) about establishing a bipartisan group to develop climate
solutions. Deutch eventually teamed up with Rep. Carlos Curbelo
(R-FL) to co-found the caucus. Since the start of 2017, the caucus has
gone through a big growth spurt, growing from
12 members in January 2017 to 70 members today.
Bucking party orthodoxy,
Republican members of the caucus have introduced a resolution that supports the
need for taking action to address climate change. But the resolution is
not legislation — it is a House resolution that doesn’t become law and will not
mandate the implementation of measures that could result in the reduction of
greenhouse gas emissions.
R.L. Miller, co-founder
of Climate Hawks Vote, a grassroots-funded group that supports candidates and
elected officials it identifies as making climate change a top priority, said
Whitehouse “nailed the problem at the core” of the House Climate Solutions
Caucus.
“Carlos Curbelo seems to
have been too busy promoting the tax scam/drilling the Arctic National Wildlife
Refuge to write a bill that actually reduces global warming,” Miller said in a
statement emailed to ThinkProgress. “He’s created a meaningless caucus being
used as political cover by vulnerable Republicans like Mimi Walters and Scott
Taylor. If he truly wants to stand for solutions, he’ll listen to us and
terminate the caucus.”
Rep. Walters (R-CA),
who joined the caucus last fall, has a League of Conservation Voters scorecard of only 5 percent. She is
considered one of the most vulnerable House Republicans up for reelection this
fall as is Rep. Taylor (R-VA),
who also joined the caucus in 2017.
As part of the caucus’s
accomplishments, Rep. Elise Stefanik (R-NY), who assumed a leadership role on
the caucus in 2017, authored a Republican
Climate Change Resolution that acknowledged the negative
impacts of climate change “that are expected to worsen in every region of the
United States” and called upon the House to work on solutions for mitigation
and adaptation efforts. The resolution was introduced into
the House of Representatives by Stefanik, along with 16 other Republican
members of the caucus.
The caucus’ most
significant accomplishment occurred last July when 46 House Republicans,
including almost all of the GOP members of the bipartisan House Climate
Solutions Caucus, joined Democrats
to defeat a bill amendment that would have prevented the Department of Defense
from analyzing and addressing climate change.
As part of its
evolution, Curbelo has spoken of the Climate Solutions Caucus having three
phases: awareness and growth, blocking bad climate legislation, and then
introducing climate legislation of their own. “It seems the caucus is starting
to enter that third phase,” Citizens’ Climate Lobby spokesperson Flannery
Winchester told ThinkProgress.
Last month, Climate
Solutions Caucus members Rep. Dan Lipinski (D-IL) and Rep. John Faso (R-NY) introduced
the bipartisan Challenges and Prizes for
Climate Act of 2018, with four additional caucus colleagues.
“We applaud Sen. Whitehouse
for all that he has done to raise the profile of the climate change issue in
the Senate and to move climate legislation forward. We were particularly
impressed by the introduction of the American Opportunity Carbon Fee Act last
year, along with Sen. Brian Schatz, which they promoted at the American
Enterprise Institute to build conservative support,” Winchester said. “It’s
clear he understands bipartisan support is the best way forward for meaningful
climate legislation.”
