Exotic animal hunting bill stalked and killed by activists
for
Stop laughing, loser, no elk for you. Screenshot from The Preserve at Boulder Hills website. |
Like the biomass incinerator bill that
was crafted to serve the interests of one developer, new bills (H8090/S2929)
that would allow so-called “shooting preserves” to import exotic animals for
hunting seem to have been introduced to serve Paul
Mihailides, owner and developer of The Preserve at Boulder Hills, located in Richmond, RI.
According to the Providence Journal,
“Although membership at The Preserve has its privileges, it also has its costs:
$250,000 for family lifetime memberships that offer access to the resort 365
days a year.
‘Social” memberships cost $50,000 and allow access 12 times a
year. Mihailides said he plans to raise the family membership rates by $25,000
every time five new members join, and total membership will be limited to 150
families.”
What kind of exotic animals are we talking about? The bills don’t specify, but elk were mentioned at an April 24 House Corporations Committee meeting by Representative Stephen Ucci (Democrat, District 42, Johnston).
Wild boars are under consideration, and perhaps even giraffes or tigers which have been taken at “canned hunts” in other states. (Representative Ucci
said at the House Corporation Committee that the bill would bring us line with
canned hunting laws in other states.)
The bills don’t specify what animals are being considered and use the term “wild or domestic game.” The bills assign the Rhode Island Department of Environmental Management (RIDEM) the task of determining whether the animals under consideration are safe to import and hunt.
“Currently we are allowed to
shoot and hunt animals that are native to Rhode Island. We are also allowed to
import certain animals. We are not allowed to hunt those imported animals. This
will allow us to hunt the elk under the same terms and conditions and laws that
we hunt the native animals,” said Jerry Sahagian,
one of the founding members of the preserve, to the House Corporations
Committee.
“The animals, after being hunted, are consumed,” added Sahagian.
Sahagian is also a member of
the Rhode Island Coastal Resources
Management Council (CRMC).
The House bill was to be
voted out of the Corporations Committee, but was removed from the agenda, and
the Senate bill was tabled without passage in the full Senate. What stopped
these bills?
Public outrage and activism.
Click here for
the video I shot at the meeting, (the same video the ProJo neglected to credit
me for in their piece on
the bills.). [Steve’s original
article also contains lots of photos of people who testified.] Among those speaking to the Senators were Naama Gidron, Mary Pendergast, Jean DePasquale, and Sarah Gleason. They advocated strongly that the bill not be passed, and, at least for now, they seem to have won.