New
Sinclair ‘must-run’ segment justifies use of tear gas on migrant children
 |
| For more cartoons by Matt Bors, CLICK HERE. |
“The migrant crisis on
our southern border has greatly escalated,” Sinclair’s chief political analyst
and former Trump aide Boris Epshteyn says in the segment. “This past weekend…. Dozens
of migrants attacked U.S. border enforcement by throwing rocks and bottles.
Ultimately, American authorities had to use tear gas to stop the attacks.”
“The fact of the matter
is that this is an attempted invasion of our country. Period,” Epshteyn
continued. “Our border must remain intact and secure.”
While the scenes at the
border were chaotic, none of the migrants were armed and there was no organized
attack on the border or Border Patrol agents. Multiple children were in the
crowd, however, and photos of them fleeing the tear gas have gone viral on social media. According to medical professionals, the tear gas could
lead to long-term respiratory problems for the children.
Prior to joining Sinclair, Epshteyn was a senior adviser to the Trump campaign and also briefly served as a special assistant in the Trump White House, where he oversaw administration officials who appeared on TV. Epshteyn also pleaded guilty to an assault charge in 2014 and was questioned by the House Intelligence Committee in relation to his business ties to Russia.
Sinclair media has
become infamous for airing its “must-run” segments through its network of 173 local TV stations —
equivalent to a station in four out of 10 of every U.S. homes.
The “must-run” segments are nothing more than pro-Trump propaganda. During the child separation crisis, for instance, Sinclair ran a segment by Epshteyn in which he dismissed the concern as “politically driven by the liberals in politics and the media” and said the policy showed that the Trump administration was “working to show that it is possible to balance humanity with security.”
The “must-run” segments are nothing more than pro-Trump propaganda. During the child separation crisis, for instance, Sinclair ran a segment by Epshteyn in which he dismissed the concern as “politically driven by the liberals in politics and the media” and said the policy showed that the Trump administration was “working to show that it is possible to balance humanity with security.”
When Sinclair faced
controversy after people started noting that its “must-run” segments featured
dozens of anchors parroting the same talking points, the company dismissed the concerns as “liberal bias” and
added that “we hope you won’t buy into the hysteria and hype.”
Of course, Sinclair
isn’t the only pro-Trump media outlet to dismiss concerns about the U.S.
tear-gassing children. On Monday, Fox & Friends devoted three hours to talking about
the migrant caravan and defending the use of tear gas against mothers and their
young children.
“The caravan has a core
of violence in it which basically communicates a sense of entitlement,” former
U.S. Border Patrol deputy chief Ron Colburn told Fox & Friends.
“[The tear gas was] absolutely [warranted]. To clarify the type of deterrent being used is OC pepper spray, it’s literally water, pepper with a small amount of alcohol… you could actually put it on your nachos and eat it.”
“[The tear gas was] absolutely [warranted]. To clarify the type of deterrent being used is OC pepper spray, it’s literally water, pepper with a small amount of alcohol… you could actually put it on your nachos and eat it.”
Meanwhile, on the
far-right, the familiar trope of crisis actors has begun to emerge, with
conspiracy theorists claiming that the photos of mothers and children
fleeing the scene were proof of a “hoax” because the
photos of the scene were “TOO perfect.”