Medicaid
expansion linked to reduced mortality among dialysis patients
In the first
three years of Medicaid expansion due to the Affordable Care Act (ACA), the
number of patients with end-stage kidney disease who died within a year of
starting dialysis decreased in states that expanded Medicaid compared to
non-expansion states, new research found.
The study, led by Brown University researchers, was
published on Oct. 25 in the Journal of the American Medical Association.
“To my knowledge, this
is the first study to find an association between Medicaid expansion under
the ACA and lower death rates in adults,” said Dr. Amal Trivedi, senior
author and an associate professor at Brown’s School of Public Health.
“Prior research on the effects of Medicaid expansion have generally found that expansion is associated with substantial gains in coverage, access to care, use of preventive health services and in some studies, better self-rated health.”
“Prior research on the effects of Medicaid expansion have generally found that expansion is associated with substantial gains in coverage, access to care, use of preventive health services and in some studies, better self-rated health.”
In the study, Trivedi and colleagues tracked more than 230,000 non-elderly patients with end-stage renal disease between 2011 and 2017. In January 2014, 25 states and the District of Columbia extended Medicaid to non-elderly residents with incomes at or below 138 percent of the poverty level, while 25 states did not (though eight more have expanded Medicaid since then).
In Medicaid expansion
states, the number of patients who died within the first year of beginning
dialysis — defined in the study as from the 91st day to the
end of the 15th month of dialysis
treatment — decreased from 6.9 percent prior to expansion to 6.1 percent after
expansion, a total reduction of 0.8 percentage points.
In non-expansion states, the mortality rate was 7 percent from January 2011 to January 2014 (prior to ACA) and 6.8 percent from January 2014 to March 2017, a reduction of 0.2 percentage points.
In non-expansion states, the mortality rate was 7 percent from January 2011 to January 2014 (prior to ACA) and 6.8 percent from January 2014 to March 2017, a reduction of 0.2 percentage points.
Not only did the
researchers compare death rates before and after expansion, they also compared
rates between states that expanded Medicaid and states that did not.
This method gave the researchers two layers of comparison — before 2014 versus after and expansion states versus non-expansion states — for determining whether the differences were associated with Medicaid expansion, Trivedi said.
This method gave the researchers two layers of comparison — before 2014 versus after and expansion states versus non-expansion states — for determining whether the differences were associated with Medicaid expansion, Trivedi said.
The adjusted absolute
reduction in mortality in expansion states versus non-expansion
states was 0.6 percentage points. Since end-stage renal disease affects
more than 100,000 Americans each year, 0.6 percentage points
equals hundreds of deaths annually, Trivedi said.
Trivedi says
that more research is needed to determine exactly what caused the decrease
in deaths, but the study suggests expanded insurance coverage, which provided
better access to care, was the key factor in reducing mortality among this
group. Medicaid expansion reduced the rate of end-stage renal disease patients
without insurance by 4.2 percentage points, primarily through Medicaid
coverage.
“Multiple factors not
explored in our paper may have contributed to the reduction of mortality among
patients with end-stage renal disease,” said Shailender Swaminathan, lead
author and an adjunct assistant professor at Brown’s School of Public Health. “Medicaid
may have resulted in better adherence to treatment sessions, normally three
times a week, because it eliminated co-payments of about $150 per week.
On the other hand, because out-of-pocket medical payments were reduced, Medicaid may have also improved patients’ finances, thereby improving health. More research may be essential to unravel this.”
On the other hand, because out-of-pocket medical payments were reduced, Medicaid may have also improved patients’ finances, thereby improving health. More research may be essential to unravel this.”
Medicaid expansion
also improved pre-dialysis care for kidney disease, as indicated by the
surgical placement of a fistula or graft before beginning dialysis, Trivedisaid.
Fistulas and grafts — two methods for accessing the bloodstream for dialysis —
are less likely to become infected than temporary venous catheters, and in
expansion states there was an increase of 2.3 percentage points in the number
of patients beginning dialysis with a fistula or graft.
The study also found
that black patients and patients between the ages of 19 and 44 had larger
decreases in mortality rates, by 1.4 percentage points and 1.1 percentage
points respectively.
Trivedi said this is likely because these groups traditionally had lower rates of insurance. As blacks and Hispanics are more likely to develop end-stage kidney disease — 3.5 times and 1.5 times respectively — Trivedi said, “Medicaid expansion in the states that have yet to expand may be a significant strategy to address racial and ethnic health disparities among patients with end-stage renal disease.”
Trivedi said this is likely because these groups traditionally had lower rates of insurance. As blacks and Hispanics are more likely to develop end-stage kidney disease — 3.5 times and 1.5 times respectively — Trivedi said, “Medicaid expansion in the states that have yet to expand may be a significant strategy to address racial and ethnic health disparities among patients with end-stage renal disease.”
Trivedi would like to
monitor the long-term effects of Medicaid expansion on end-stage kidney disease
mortality and incidence rates. It is possible that increases in insurance rates
due to Medicaid expansion could lead to better recognition, treatment and
management of diabetes and hypertension, the two key underlying causes of
kidney disease, ultimately reducing the number of people who develop end-stage
renal disease, he said.
“Our study suggests
that there are significant mortality reductions in patients with end-stage
renal disease, who have substantial medical needs, in the states that expanded
Medicaid,” Trivedi said.
“We’re studying a central question in health policy: To what extent does expanded health coverage save lives?”
“We’re studying a central question in health policy: To what extent does expanded health coverage save lives?”
He added that the
results may apply beyond patients with kidney disease to others with serious
chronic conditions, but more research is needed.
In addition to Trivedi
and Swaminathan, the research team included Rebecca Thorsness and Yoojin Lee of
Brown University; Dr. Ben Sommers of Harvard’s School of Public Health;and
Dr. Rajnish Mehrotra of the University of Washington School of Medicine.
The National
Institutes of Health (grant R01DK113398) supported this research.