Labor Department Wants Teens Operating
Dangerous Equipment in Nursing Homes
 |
| Yeah, make America great again. |
Continuing on its
mission to deregulate worker protections, the Trump administration’s Wage and
Hour Division of the Department of Labor has proposed a new
rule that would allow 16- and 17-year-old nursing-home workers
to operate power-driven patient lifting devices without any adult supervision
or assistance, despite evidence that it is dangerous.
These devices are used to lift and transfer patients out of their beds or a chair who cannot lift themselves.
These devices are used to lift and transfer patients out of their beds or a chair who cannot lift themselves.
Huh? You ask. Didn’t
we settle the issue of child labor like a century ago? Don’t we have a
government agency that researches the hazards of this kind of work?
The Wage and Hour
Division of the Department of Labor — and not the Occupational Safety and
Health Administration — is the agency tasked with determining what kind of
work children can perform safely, under the child labor provisions
of the Fair Labor Standards Act.
The main rule is that if you are not yet 18, you are prohibited from being employed in occupations that have been declared hazardous by the Secretary of Labor.
That seems pretty clear, until you ask what the Secretary of Labor considers to be “hazardous.” For example, is the use of power-driven hoists to lift and transfer patients in hospitals or nursing homes hazardous?
The main rule is that if you are not yet 18, you are prohibited from being employed in occupations that have been declared hazardous by the Secretary of Labor.
That seems pretty clear, until you ask what the Secretary of Labor considers to be “hazardous.” For example, is the use of power-driven hoists to lift and transfer patients in hospitals or nursing homes hazardous?
Good question.
Wage and Hour didn’t have the expertise to decide, so when this issue first came up during the Obama administration, they went to the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health for some help.
And what did NIOSH say? According to Deborah Berkowitz at the National Employment Law Project:
Wage and Hour didn’t have the expertise to decide, so when this issue first came up during the Obama administration, they went to the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health for some help.
And what did NIOSH say? According to Deborah Berkowitz at the National Employment Law Project:
Based on a review of the relevant scientific literature regarding evaluations of patient handling devices and biomechanical analyses, NIOSH has determined that many 16- and 17-year-old employees cannot safely operate power-driven hoists to lift and transfer patients by themselves . . . Independent use of power-driven hoists by 16- and 17-year-olds would put them at increased risk for serious musculoskeletal injuries. Moreover, the scientific literature indicates that most 16- and 17-year-old workers do not have the ability to properly assess the risks associated with using power-driven lifts.
OK, that sounds pretty
clear. Which is why the Obama administration adopted, a common-sense enforcement
policy mandating that if a 16- or 17-year-old caregiver is
going to use a mechanical lift, he or she must have completed 75 hours of
nurse’s aide training and must be assisted by an experienced caregiver who is
at least 18 years old.
The Current Proposal
Despite the NIOSH
recommendation and the current policy that seems to be working pretty well, the
Labor Dept. has now proposed to
rescind this enforcement policy, allegedly in order to expand apprenticeships
for young workers.
With over 1.1 million
jobs currently open in healthcare and social assistance, the U.S. Department of
Labor today announced a proposal to allow younger Americans to safely develop
critical skills for fast-growing jobs in healthcare.
Why are they deregulating
and weakening these protections?
A bipartisan group of
lawmakers and the regulated community have criticized the 2010 regulation on
the grounds that it unnecessarily deprives youth of valuable skills development
opportunities; exacerbates staffing shortages at healthcare facilities; delays
the care patients receive; and causes youth to manually lift patients – even
though using patient lifts is widely recognized as safer.
In other words, the Labor Dept. is bowing to industry pressure for cheap and compliant labor.
Many in Congress aren’t pleased. A group of 47 House Democrats sent a letter to Sec. of Labor Alex Acosta last August “to express their concerns that DOL’s efforts to weaken hazardous work protections for minors could put the health and safety of young workers at risk” and asked that the department first request a NIOSH review of the proposed changes.
Weakening protections
for young workers could reverse the progress of lowering fatalities among young
workers and further jeopardize their health and safety.
Workplace safety laws and the Department’s [Hazardous Occupation Orders (HOs)] have made a difference in saving lives and limbs of young workers.
The number of young workers aged 15 to 17 killed on the job has declined over the past 18 years….While we believe in expanding job opportunities for young workers, I am sure you would agree this should not be done at the expense of their health, safety or lives.
Workplace safety laws and the Department’s [Hazardous Occupation Orders (HOs)] have made a difference in saving lives and limbs of young workers.
The number of young workers aged 15 to 17 killed on the job has declined over the past 18 years….While we believe in expanding job opportunities for young workers, I am sure you would agree this should not be done at the expense of their health, safety or lives.
Patient Lifting: Health
Worker Hazard
Healthcare workers often
experience musculoskeletal disorders at a rate exceeding that of workers in
construction, mining, and manufacturing. These injuries are due
in large part to repeated manual patient handling activities, often involving
heavy manual lifting associated with transferring, and repositioning patients
and working in extremely awkward postures.
The problem of lifting patients is compounded by the increasing weight of patients to be lifted due to the obesity epidemic in the United States and the rapidly increasing number of older people who require assistance with the activities of daily living.
The problem of lifting patients is compounded by the increasing weight of patients to be lifted due to the obesity epidemic in the United States and the rapidly increasing number of older people who require assistance with the activities of daily living.
And on Sept. 25, Reps.
Bobby Scott (D-Va.), Rosa DeLauro (D-Conn.), Mark Takano (D-Calif.), and
Lucille Roybal-Allard (D-Calif.) called on Acosta to rescind the proposal:
There are many ways to
expand job opportunities for young people without risking their safety and the
safety of patients in hospitals and nursing homes across the country. The
administration should follow the scientific evidence and withdraw this
proposal.
Patient advocates
aren’t very happy either. A group composed of the California Advocates for
Nursing Home Reform, Center for Medicare Advocacy, Long Term Care Community
Coalition, National Consumer Voice for Quality Long-Term Care and Penelope Ann
Shaw a nursing home resident stated that
Revoking the 2011 DOL
Field Memo that prohibits 16- and 17-year-old nursing home assistants from
operating patient lifts by themselves would recklessly ignore research and
experience and turn over one of the most complicated and hazardous jobs in
nursing homes to the least experienced workers.
The most vulnerable and dependent patients in the health care system would be at increased risk of injuries that can cause pain, broken bones, medical complications, increased disablement, hospitalization, and frequently, death.
The most vulnerable and dependent patients in the health care system would be at increased risk of injuries that can cause pain, broken bones, medical complications, increased disablement, hospitalization, and frequently, death.
ACTION BOX/What You
Can Do About It
New regulations need to
be justified with hard evidence. Weakening those regulations also need hard
evidence. Wage and Hour must consider all comments and evidence submitted
before it issues the final rule. The agency is accepting comments on the
proposal until Monday, Nov. 26. If you’re interested, you can submit comments
here: www.regulations.gov/comment?D=WHD-2018-0002-0001.
