Managerialism
erodes teachers' mental health and well-being
Taylor & Francis
Group
Performance targets,
increased workload, curriculum changes and other bureaucratic changes are
eroding teachers' professional identity and harming their mental health, a new
study in Educational Review finds.
The study's authors
interviewed 39 teachers across England and Wales who had experienced long term
absence from work due to mental health problems, and six head, deputy and
assistant head teachers who had dealt with mental health problems among staff.
The teachers cited
constant, complex change in educational policies, target-led performance, lack
of managerial support and heavy workload as causes of increased stress and
anxiety. They spoke of disillusionment, loss of self-esteem and feelings of
failure, leading some to take early retirement or, in one case, attempt suicide
due to pressure of work.
Many believed that the
focus on targets and results is fundamentally altering the teacher's role as
educator and getting in the way of the pupil-teacher relationship, ultimately
harming the learning opportunities and failing to address the psychological
needs of children.
Job satisfaction is also being eroded by bureaucratic demands, with excessive paperwork and pressure to improve results adding to teachers' already heavy workloads.
Job satisfaction is also being eroded by bureaucratic demands, with excessive paperwork and pressure to improve results adding to teachers' already heavy workloads.
Difficulties with
leadership and management styles were widespread, with many teachers feeling
they were under constant scrutiny and pressure to perform to unrealistic
expectations.
Although conscious of the pressures on school managers to successfully implement new policies, teachers felt excluded from the process and ill-equipped to make the required changes.
Although conscious of the pressures on school managers to successfully implement new policies, teachers felt excluded from the process and ill-equipped to make the required changes.
This managerialist
approach to education and the consequent loss of decision-making about
classroom practice left many teachers with doubts about their role. Most felt
that they were failing the children and themselves by no longer being able to
encourage active learning in the classroom.
The study's Principal
Investigator, Gerry Leavey, Director of the Bamford Centre for Mental Health
& Wellbeing at Ulster University said: "The destruction of self-esteem
and effectiveness, combined with the despair of an externally constructed
failure permeated most of our interviews with teachers.
Their comments express a tension between the old view of what it means to be a teacher -- commitment, service to the school and pupils' learning -- and the new managerialist view -- accountability, performativity and meeting standards in a new, corporate world."
Their comments express a tension between the old view of what it means to be a teacher -- commitment, service to the school and pupils' learning -- and the new managerialist view -- accountability, performativity and meeting standards in a new, corporate world."
"This tension is
often internalised and impacts on teachers' identity. It often pits taking care
of themselves and the non-academic needs of pupils against management duties
and targets. Too often, this leads to stress and mental health problems. Too
many good teachers are leaving the profession through ill-health."
Dr Barbara Skinner, an
educationalist at Ulster University, added that: "Educational reforms, and
the rigidly prescribed organisational and management structures that accompany
them, should be weighed against their impacts on professional identity and
personal well-being. We also need better evidence-based interventions to
promote teacher well-being"